PoEHUD Overlay Updated

[vasukrub]

Game was patched, same as the hud, check for last update.

Using the new one, still not working.

[vmv]

Using the new one, still not working.

Download the ZIP from the github and just copy the PoEHUD.exe to your old hud.

[vasukrub]

Download the ZIP from the github and just copy the PoEHUD.exe to your old hud.

ํyeah i did, even try use the complete new one still error. Maybe only with my Garena_TH server tho.

[dseo80]

holy shit man read the thread. I dont know how the cheat and vmv are so patient with you idiots sometimes. garena version has not been updated yet! **** man. honestly.

[vasukrub]

holy shit man read the thread. I dont know how the cheat and vmv are so patient with you idiots sometimes. garena version has not been updated yet! **** man. honestly.

Easy bros, I got a patch download and when i run the POE today. Or that wasn't the same update?

[ngcheukwai]

can't load poehud. when i open it , programme cpu use lock 25% . not happened.

[vmv]

can't load poehud. when i open it , programme cpu use lock 25% . not happened.

Try update your Net Framework: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/down....aspx?id=49982

[dd4thewin]

Copy this lines into your preload_alerts.txt and use both methods to see which one is more accurate (only one method works not both, so you need to comment the lines below and restart the hud for testing).
I think preload_alerts.txt is more accurate but dunno for sure, you must test and see, and i also think that is something wrong with the PreloadAlertPlugin code, but that needs a pro coder attention.
You can also try to fix the PreloadAlertPlugin code.

Metadata/Chests/PerandusChests/PerandusChestStandard; Perandus Chest; ff99fb33
Metadata/Chests/PerandusChests/PerandusChestRarity; Perandus Cache; ff99fb33
Metadata/Chests/PerandusChests/PerandusChestQuantity; Perandus Hoard; ff99fb33
Metadata/Chests/PerandusChests/PerandusChestCoins; Perandus Coffer; ff99fb33
Metadata/Chests/PerandusChests/PerandusChestJewellery; Perandus Jewellery Box; ff99fb33
Metadata/Chests/PerandusChests/PerandusChestGems; Perandus Safe; ff99fb33
Metadata/Chests/PerandusChests/PerandusChestCurrency; Perandus Treasury; ff99fb33
Metadata/Chests/PerandusChests/PerandusChestInventory; Perandus Wardrobe; ff99fb33
Metadata/Chests/PerandusChests/PerandusChestDivinationCards; Perandus Catalogue; ff99fb33
Metadata/Chests/PerandusChests/PerandusChestKeepersOfTheTrove; Perandus Trove; ff99fb33
Metadata/Chests/PerandusChests/PerandusChestUniqueItem; Perandus Locker; ff99fb33
Metadata/Chests/PerandusChests/PerandusChestMaps; Perandus Archive; ff99fb33
Metadata/Chests/PerandusChests/PerandusChestFishing; Perandus Tackle Box; ff99fb33
Metadata/Chests/PerandusChests/PerandusManorUniqueChest; Cadiro's Locker; ff99fb33
Metadata/Chests/PerandusChests/PerandusManorCurrencyChest; Cadiro's Treasury; ff99fb33
Metadata/Chests/PerandusChests/PerandusManorMapsChest; Cadiro's Archive; ff99fb33
Metadata/Chests/PerandusChests/PerandusManorJewelryChest; Cadiro's Jewellery Box; ff99fb33
Metadata/Chests/PerandusChests/PerandusManorDivinationCardsChest; Cadiro's Catalogue; ff99fb33
Metadata/Chests/PerandusChests/PerandusManorLostTreasureChest; Grand Perandus Vault; ff99fb33 

Game was patched, same as the hud, check for last update.

which one do you think is more accurate the one you posted me to paste or the one already on in your hud? cause I used your hud a little bit tonight and I think its pretty accurate but ill have to test more so if I paste those lines into the preload_alerts what am I supposed to comment out? cause I don't even see that line of code in that file

[joetheplayer]

garena sea hud still working like a boss 4/1/2016:shh:

[vasukrub]

garena sea hud still working like a boss 4/1/2016:shh:

Nooooooo, Is only Garena Thailand is broken here?

Cant walk out the town with the HUD afraid of reflex, lol.

[Psalmin]

Hi guys, i'm new to Hud.
Was wondering: if i use Hud on a random account (made for solely farming with hud, specially Cadiro for this league) would my main account (played on the same machine) be at risk of ban too?
Thank you very much and Thanks to the magnificient devs for sharing.

[killerng1703]

Garena TW still not working

[vmv]

which one do you think is more accurate the one you posted me to paste or the one already on in your hud? cause I used your hud a little bit tonight and I think its pretty accurate but ill have to test more so if I paste those lines into the preload_alerts what am I supposed to comment out? cause I don't even see that line of code in that file

I am using this paste right now for testing...and if you don't comment any of this lines, whatever is in hardcode won't show up.
My fork of the hud is like the main one regardless preload alerts.

To test properly, but even so, dunno 100% if it's accurate:

- Copy/paste this into your preload_alerts.txt.
- Go hunt, and if there is any box, you can comment the line of that box then restart the hud .
- At this point, the hard coded part is taking charge over the commented line.
- See if the hardcodeded method is showing the box.

Or you can open up a new hud whenever you see a box, and use both methods...commented/not.
Whatever is commented, it's taken cared by the code.

[TehCheat]

I am using this paste right now for testing...and if you don't comment any of this lines, whatever is in hardcode won't show up.
My fork of the hud is like the main one regardless preload alerts.

To test properly, but even so, dunno 100% if it's accurate:

- Copy/paste this into your preload_alerts.txt.
- Go hunt, and if there is any box, you can comment the line of that box then restart the hud .
- At this point, the hard coded part is taking charge over the commented line.
- See if the hardcodeded method is showing the box.

Or you can open up a new hud whenever you see a box, and use both methods...commented/not.
Whatever is commented, it's taken cared by the code.

Looking at the preloadalertplugin.cs code, it shouldn't make a difference. If he thinks it's accurate with one and not the other, it's placebo. They're separated by, effectively, one line of code (the check for corrupted areas). The difference in the comparisons is "do they exactly match" and "does the one start with the same text as the other and also ignore case" which will both be true if both strings are identical. If either method was more reliable, it would be the way the hard-coded strings are compared (if they're not identical because the entity's path has an extra character at the end, or if the case didn't match it would still add the alert).

Though I will say each of those checks should have a "continue" if they're true, so we're not wasting time looking for something we've already found.

It also stops looking for loaded files 10 seconds after you enter an area, which is probably the problem. People on potatoes might not be able to load entities for an area in 10 seconds. Perhaps some of the memory changes GGG made last night will help fix that problem.

So do we want to get rid of that timer? Make it longer? The amount of cycles wasted with that timer gone is minimal, it reads an int (loaded files count) from poe and if it's the same as the last time, it's done. If it changes, it iterates through all of the files, which is some work. If the file list gets appended, as I would expect, I could make it smarter, keep track of the last address, and start reading from there when new files are loaded rather than reading through all of the files, only do a complete refresh when the area is changed. That would make the timer completely unnecessary and take up far less cycles than it currently is.

[TehCheat]

OK, I made an executive decision. The timer is gone. It will continue to parse through the loaded files no matter how long you're in an area as long as new items are loaded. This should fix the inaccuracies with preload alerts.

Change is pushed out. Exe rebuilt. Also made a release with the changes.


I'll probably play around on the dev branch and change the way it parses through the loaded files, to test out if there's a more efficient way to handle loaded files.