[Poll] What emulater do you like best?

[DaemonOnFire]

MaNGOS + Trinity

, because I use them since they released, i tried different emulators like Anscent, Antrix for some while, but i switched back to MaNGOS.
..more blizzlike.

[AzolexX]

At this moment i support WCell and AspireDev's Hearthstone, there are a lot of reasons for that, but i will vote for AspireDev's Hearthston as my fav emu atm.

[AstraL92]

I like MaNGOS, because I use it since release .I tried other emu but in my opinion MaNGOS the best.

[2dgreengiant]

Added note: I tried to add a poll to this as well for oyu Stoneharry but it would not let me for soem weird reason :P

[WiePasta]

Mangos because it got alot of the talent trees working and worling los. and alot of non bugged spells

[Donandi]

ArcEmu!! =P

[Dythzer]

MaNGOS because:
* Least bugs overall
* Great project for learning, clean and nice code
* Experienced and stable community = lots of great tools, patches, DB/script projects etc
* Experienced developers (which other emulators steals code from :P)
* Future

[1ns0mnia]

Antrix, i never really saw it i came into EMU when it was known as ascent (only like a week after but meh)

but yeah the original ascent project was win, stable, reliable, less Q_Q and drama like today.

today though eWoW is looking good, i prefer C# to C++ and most of the coders are decent people from MMowned. plus the layout of the core (directories etc) make it easy to edit.

[Performer]

Im mainly an aspire user, but my main prio on my pre tbc realm atm is to get los working.. MaNGOS 2.4.3 has it but there is not alot of security on MaNGOS and i dont think overall it is for public servers. But yeah, i support aspire.

[Henkke]

Im mainly an aspire user, but my main prio on my pre tbc realm atm is to get los working.. MaNGOS 2.4.3 has it but there is not alot of security on MaNGOS and i dont think overall it is for public servers. But yeah, i support aspire.

It has the best anti-cheat patches for 2.4.3 actually. And smallest amount of exploits / hacks available..
and offcourse it's still steadily updated along with the master branch

[Bugazi]

I started on MangoS because it was the only one I had heard of way back when. Figured out it was crap, when to Antrix and have been using something similar ever since.

Antrix -> Ascent -> ArcEmu

And I have piddled with hearthstone trying to get it to work but can't seem to fix that damned .dll error.

[stoneharry]

Updated with all votes, Antrix/Ascent i've counted as other.

[Vvdarknessvv]

Well, I formally worked on a sever that used ArcEmu, It is a good Emulator, but I would have to vote for MaNGOS, since i have started working with it, its has had more support, and it is easier to use there database to customize the server that you plan on running, with out having to script new C++ into the Core data.

So If I could vote twice it would go MaNGOS - ArcEmu.

I like Arc because of the Lua support, I am having to learn SD2 and ACID for MaNGOS which I really dont mind, but seeing as the coding bases are different between the two emulators, other then C*. Id like them both alot better if they used the same scripting, but if that was the case, wouldn't they just be the same cores. Lol.

[darkwiz787]

ArcEmu>Ascent>AspireDEV's Hearthstone (Non working gossip?).

I never used and never will use Mangos.

Does ArcEmu support C++ AND LUA?

[Sounddead]

Does ArcEmu support C++

lololololololol