[Sploit] Use Potion of Illusion in Arena

[inarius]

my friend got a 3 hours bann for using this>>

[Shikona]

This could actually give you a slight advantage against melée classes such as a Backstab specced Sub Rogue if you are able to transform into something without a distinguishable back (like a Wisp, for example).

[OverLordErIcH]

This is an awesome find man. +5 rep

[Bilderberg]

might i suggest wisp amulet from archeology... tiny targets moving erratically.

[zerabus12]

nice, thank you man :>

[PetRiLJoe]

At best this is a [Visual] debuff. what Advantage does this provide? they can tell what class you are still via mouseover or name color... etc.

Lolol read below

The point he was making was that a glitch does not necessarily need to convey an unfair advantage, which is accurate. I think you might have misread what he wrote. That being said, yeah, there's nothing wrong with asking for the visual tag here.

EDIT: Also, nice quote in the sig. Shen an Calhar FTW.

Ty

thankee. Carai an Caldazar! though the Aiel are cooler imo. but the whole "Spit in sightblinders eye" quotation wont fit in my siggy.

An exploit (or as the op has chosen to call it, a "sploit") on this site is defined as providing an unfair advantage over other players. this does not provide an unfair advantage. therefore it is not an exploit (Sploit, as the OP calls it in the title). it is a [Visual] glitch. Visual glitches do belong in this forum area, but the name of the OP needs to be changed to reflect that this is a visual glitch, not an exploit.

Lolol read below

Why are you arguing this TehVoyage?

You realize the exploit is that you are not suppose to look like this in arena right?

Arena is suppose to remove all debuffs and buffs, hence why you can't use a deviate delight, noggenfogger or other such items in arena. This also provides a lot of fun and a WTFFactor in arena which everyone loves

One unfair advantage is for druids shifting constantly and looking the same, not many people focus on the druid form buff they usually look physically at a druid to determine which form he is in.

Also play a rogue and change into a feral cat and open on someone the first thought in their mind is not gonna be hey look a rogue is on me. It will be more like "hey feral, wait rogue, huh, wtf?"

This is more of a unfair advantage on the human Psyche rather then the game mechanics themselves.

Which other forum would this belong in?
I don't see many guides that can get you banned
Relax [=


--excuse my grammar

Well said.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

[TehVoyager]

Why are you arguing this TehVoyage?

You realize the exploit is that you are not suppose to look like this in arena right?

Arena is suppose to remove all debuffs and buffs, hence why you can't use a deviate delight, noggenfogger or other such items in arena. This also provides a lot of fun and a WTFFactor in arena which everyone loves

One unfair advantage is for druids shifting constantly and looking the same, not many people focus on the druid form buff they usually look physically at a druid to determine which form he is in.

Also play a rogue and change into a feral cat and open on someone the first thought in their mind is not gonna be hey look a rogue is on me. It will be more like "hey feral, wait rogue, huh, wtf?"

This is more of a unfair advantage on the human Psyche rather then the game mechanics themselves.

Which other forum would this belong in?
I don't see many guides that can get you banned
Relax [=


--excuse my grammar

I'm auguring this because I'm right. its not an exploit, as this site defines them. its a visual glitch.
i understand that arena removes buffs. but what you say here basically confirms what i was saying: "This also provides a lot of fun and a WTFFactor in arena which everyone loves" Fun factor and things that everyone loves are fair. but, not an exploit, as it provides no advantage over other players. therefore its a [visual].

my main is a druid, and let me confirm for you that after the whole "lifegiving seed potion of illusion" visual bug, and the "mount in shapeshift forms" visual bug they changed potion of illusion to be overwritten by druid shapeshifts. in fact the only visual i know to still work with druids in form is the Locket from the Molten front quest chain, that changes your appearance to a druid of the flame.
so no, it will not work for druids either.

and you seem to be grasping at straws regarding this at this point.

being a [visual] doesn't retract from its fun, or its usefulness to confuse idiots.

Lolol read below
Ty
Lolol read below
Well said.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

your post. it makes little sense.

i read them. i read the responses to what i write. and to take a page from you, loloolol read below

Interesting find +rep! Not that it really matters, but Voyager is right about tagging the thread.

and noone cares that you sent this from some mobile device.

[Exploitordie]

this is a fun find i'll def be using it for that wtf factor. it is a visual glitch though voyager is right

[PetRiLJoe]

I'm auguring this because I'm right. its not an exploit, as this site defines them. its a visual glitch.
i understand that arena removes buffs. but what you say here basically confirms what i was saying: "This also provides a lot of fun and a WTFFactor in arena which everyone loves" Fun factor and things that everyone loves are fair. but, not an exploit, as it provides no advantage over other players. therefore its a [visual].

my main is a druid, and let me confirm for you that after the whole "lifegiving seed potion of illusion" visual bug, and the "mount in shapeshift forms" visual bug they changed potion of illusion to be overwritten by druid shapeshifts. in fact the only visual i know to still work with druids in form is the Locket from the Molten front quest chain, that changes your appearance to a druid of the flame.
so no, it will not work for druids either.

and you seem to be grasping at straws regarding this at this point.

being a [visual] doesn't retract from its fun, or its usefulness to confuse idiots.



your post. it makes little sense.

i read them. i read the responses to what i write. and to take a page from you, loloolol read below


and noone cares that you sent this from some mobile device.

it's a signature newb. Lol lol

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

[TehVoyager]

In addition, i notice your only rebuttal of my comment was to start calling names.

And noone cares that you have a Samsung Galaxy S3. so if it IS a signature, your vanity and cry for attention by stating at the end of every comment "LOOK GUYS I CAN AFFORD EXPENSIVE STUFF" makes me pity you.

Now, anything else to say?

This thread should be labled [Visual]. end of story. its a good find on the OP, but its the truth.

[wickermanz]

This also works with all the hallows end wands =P

[OverLordErIcH]

This also works with all the hallows end wands =P

They still haven't fixed this? I bet there are lots more items as well.

[Elektropop]

In addition, i notice your only rebuttal of my comment was to start calling names.

And noone cares that you have a Samsung Galaxy S3. so if it IS a signature, your vanity and cry for attention by stating at the end of every comment "LOOK GUYS I CAN AFFORD EXPENSIVE STUFF" makes me pity you.

Now, anything else to say?

This thread should be labled [Visual]. end of story. its a good find on the OP, but its the truth.

The Tapatalk app ends every message with Sent from my [insert cellphone here] using Tapatalk.

[WizardTrokair]

your vanity and cry for attention by stating at the end of every comment

For what it is worth... I think mobile devices just add this automatically... I don't think it is anything he types intentionally.


*edit: haha, Elektropop beat me to it.

[abaraikenshi]

@TehVoyager

Wow...why don't you chill out? That "Signature' is something that is added due to the app, not him crying for attention. It's like somebody pissed in your cheerios this morning and your taking it out on other people...

BTW - I do believe there is a "report" button, next time instead of making yourself look foolish, might I suggest you use that instead?