It is a shame people cant appreciate what they are given. Obviously the person who had claimed this report is childish and does not have much wit. UltraCore has released source publicly that was deemed release worthy. In no way are they Obligated to Always and instantly provide work that has been done. When a source release is decided It happens on sourceforge or to a specified place. The idea that there would be an obligation to provide access to a repo that cost the Devs money for bandwidth is rediculous.
The fact that some data comes from "trinity sources" then is implemented into UltraCore. Most of the time that data needing to be altered to properly do so. Us then not instantly providing a copy of the result after this process IS NOT a violation of GPL. In conclusion UltraCore is not obligated to release any of its work to anyone because of this.
Unless anyone wants to prove my statements wrong??
If a private project is funded by its developers and provided data taken from other sources is altered then used. Means the project belongs to those who did the private work. I for one thank Pryd and Lorac for their work and contributions as I'm sure many others do as well. The fact that they would release the work publicly at all is awesome.
I am certain things will resolve soon and UltraCore will live on. In any case its good to see Pryd respond and amend so quickly. This could be a good turn for the project who knows.
I know I will continue to use and support the project as I know many many other will do the same.
I been in the hospital for the past few days I had no idea of this I was like wut.... so obviously I'm a little late.