WoW v3.0.2 Information

[Xarg0]

ZOMG XARG0 ACTUALLY CONTRIBUTED TO THE THREAD!

Quick, someone call the presses.

PS. His terminology may be a bit screwy but for the points and purposes of your question Xarg0 is right.

That might be because I currently read up on "Einsteins allgemeine Relativitäts Theorie" wich screws the mind a bit, but is very interesting.
Yet I feel kinda strange about korknob, he's running a "comercial" bot without any reversing skillz or even common sens :/ still it's funny how he changed the cracking security of his bot after I told him that it's not a good Idea to have all WoW Account Names of his customers inside the bot and he always uses outdated packing methods, c'mon why do you use Themida 1.8.x.x when there's a new version?
Well atleast it's a better protection than pespin (took me like 5 min to unpack'n'crack) and the new security concept is week too because I've got a full list of account names of his customers, I could just make the bot send one of them to crack it :>
but it's not even worth the effort :>

[korknob]

K, was a problem in my code, Tried to convert a pointer to a mob structure back to a pointer to the Obj itself which didn't work. Don't see what the hate's all about, I contribute just as much as anyone else.

I didn't change my security based on anything you said. If my bot is so terrible why do you spend time unpacking, cracking it and probably using it. I use an old version of Themida because I like to spend more time adding features to the bot than trying to keep *******s from stealing it. New WoW patch comes out, then I switch to a better security system when everyone's forced to upgrade.

Soooooo, wheres your bot then? You want to shit on my work and you've done nothing yourself. You think 1 person without reversing "skillz" or common sense is capable of doing what I've done? Lawl. Seems I've traded my "reversing skills" for "mastery of the English language". It's a fair trade, try it some time.

Cypher tries to give you props for contributing and there you go ruining it by opening your mouth. It's ironic you have 3x as many posts as I do yet the same amount of rep - apparently very few people find it useful when you open your mouth and shouldn't make a habit of it.

[Xarg0]

You're selling the work of other people that are willing to share it, jugding from your posts I see that you're not able to keep your bot up to date by yourself. I didn't insult you, I only stated my opinion on your bot and the way you work.

As I can see from your answer you're building a strawman, I don't want to destroy your bot I'm only annoyed about the way you deal with your costumers, they payed 25$ for your bot and had to wait about 5 days for an update, also they made their account names public because you had them compiled into your bot, and not even ecrypted them or something...

and about your "mastery of the English language", it's not too hard for someone who lives in an english speaking country, but you might notice that some people don't speak english in their every day life and due to the lack of practise make some mistakes...

and I need to state one last but important thing, a forum is a place to discuss and to argue your opinion until now I didn't even start to flame but if you realy want a flame war, and that's what you're currently about to start, you can start one I don't give a damn what a bad coder from Ohio USA thinks about me :-)

So long and thanks for your fail post trying to defend yourself

[argh44z]

Any flaming aside, I'm wondering why anyone would consider selling a WoW bot at the moment, particularily someone from the US. That'd undoubtedly put you on the radar much quicker (and I'm not talking about their anti-cheat developers-- but from their legal department). This considering the Glider case and Lax deciding not to release isxwarden in this legal climate. Sure, blizzard isn't likely going to go after a bot publisher with tens or hundreds of users, but considering how much it is being promoted, that number will likely jump. Anyone remember gotwow and the private investigator and lawyers sent to the owner's house? You don't want to be in blizzard's radar.

[Cypher]

As much as I hate to do it I'm gonna have to semi-agree with Xarg0, it is kinda funny how you have a paid bot yet you're not capable of updating it, I mean, I can understand if you need a tiny bit of help to get something you overlooked, but to me your entire bot smells like copypasta.

Furthermore, I have a good grasp on the English language, reversing "skillz", AND I'm an *******. Can I have a cookie? (P.S. I have more rep too, more cookies please.)

By the way, using an old version of Themida is kinda pointless caus it's the old versions that are the ones easy to unpack in an automated fashion 99% of the time, hence defeating the purpose of a packer. I'm gonna assume its not because you're "adding features" but because you're using a pirated version.

Btw, Xarg0, I don't really hate you THAT much, you're just fun to rip on. <3

PS. Korknob, it wasn't "props", I was being sarcastic.

EDIT: Also, you most definitely CAN convert a CGUnit_C* to a CGObject_C*, that's one of the great things about inheritance and polymorphism, you've obviously ****ed something up there.

[Xarg0]

Btw, Xarg0, I don't really hate you THAT much, you're just fun to rip on. <3

I <3 U XXX

Hell, I know you're beeing sarcastic and it's funny, mainly because some people think you're serious ^.^ but if you take a look at this hole section of the forum you'll see that about every second post contains sarcasm and flaming, that's why I love this section so much, most people here don't give a damn about flaming nor sarcasm and we I've learned alot around here.

About Themida I must admit that I propperbly didn't unpack it correctly as korknob stated that his security mesures are still the same I have to assume that I made a mistake somewehere while unpacking because I couldn't find the array of account names in the current version, but I'm not going to waste any more time on it since it wont help to convince korknob that he's got to change his auth function ^^
Maybe he'll change it when the first few users of his bot complain about having their accounts stolen but from what he stated so far he proberbly doesn't care about what happens to his customers accounts...

[Cypher]

Wait wait wait. I wasn't paying attention to that part of the convo. You saying he has a list of accounts stored clientside? Thats hilarious. I might go crack it when I get bored.

[Xarg0]

Yes he compares them locally and sends the result to the auth server or something, I didn't bother reversing it any futher xD

[korknob]

No, the local string array was account names to skip authenticating with the server because they had trouble connecting to it. It has since been removed.

I appreciate the help you guys give, I'm sorry you get the impression my work is copy/paste, /shrug. I try to contribute as much as I can. I was a little late to the game this last patch because it took me 3 days to update (reinstalled wow and BC multiple times to find out it was a bad stick of ram).

[Yazuak]

Cypher... you should work at blizzard. i bet they would pay you lots and lots of money.

[r3deemer]

i dunno... from what ive seen Cypher would probably get bored...

Whats the fun in being given something when he could go through all the trouble to crack it himself...

[Cypher]

i dunno... from what ive seen Cypher would probably get bored...

Whats the fun in being given something when he could go through all the trouble to crack it himself...

I'd very much like to see the server code, as that is unavailable to users in any form and therefore cannot be "cracked", and finding bugs in it involves a lot of guess and check work.

[real.deal]

Okay -- so i am new to this whole memory editing thing, and it seems very interesting. I read through the post but I am still confused as to what the code means and where to "input" the code and such....

All in all, I am asking politely if someone wouldn't mind giving me a better understanding of memory editing and all its tricks and such. I have used Cheat Engine for speed hacking, thats about it.....but I would like to learn more.

I'll check out some more posts and info the net in the meanwhile.

[Xarg0]

Okay -- so i am new to this whole memory editing thing, and it seems very interesting. I read through the post but I am still confused as to what the code means and where to "input" the code and such....

All in all, I am asking politely if someone wouldn't mind giving me a better understanding of memory editing and all its tricks and such. I have used Cheat Engine for speed hacking, thats about it.....but I would like to learn more.

I'll check out some more posts and info the net in the meanwhile.

This is far beyond your knowledge, using Cheat Engines speed hack doesn't qualify you in any way for game hacking...
If you realy want to get involved with memory reading/editing you should learn a programming language that is capable of pointers first, that way you'll understand the hole pointer concept, the next step would be to read about process handling and the windows process api (ReadProcessMemory/WriteProcessMemory OpenProcess etc), you'll also need to learn about windows' memory management.

[testout]

Can anyone help me out wwith using injection to parse an LUA string.

I have allocated some memory and written a string to it.

I have then allocate some memory and written code to it to call the

0x0077CDD0 -> CGameLua__Dostring

But i'm getting access violations.

Code I have tried:

mov EDX, [0x011CA260]
mov EDX, [EDX+0x2864]
FS mov EAX, [0x2C]
mov EAX, [EAX]
add EAX, 8
mov [EAX], edx
push {0}
call 0x0077CDD0         
retn

and

mov EDX, [0x011CA260]
mov EDX, [EDX+0x2864]
FS mov EAX, [0x2C]
mov EAX, [EAX]
add EAX, 8
mov [EAX], edx
mov ecx, {0}
call 0x0077CDD0         
retn

and

push {0}
call 0x0077CDD0         
retn

and

mov ecx, {0}
call 0x0077CDD0         
retn

wher {0} is replaced with the address of the string

wait, Has the address of the funtion changed in 3.0.3? If so what is the new offset?