[Program] WoW Lua Enabler menu

Shout-Out

User Tag List

Page 10 of 12 FirstFirst ... 6789101112 LastLast
Results 136 to 150 of 170
  1. #136
    Apoc's Avatar Angry Penguin
    Reputation
    1388
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    2,750
    Thanks G/R
    0/13
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by joe7314 View Post
    How is this done? I could not see any settings or anything about it?
    Originally Posted by [email protected]
    Right now if you want to disable the setting synchronization, you can do this on each computer where you want only local settings:
    /console synchronizeSettings 0

    In 3.0.3 you will be able to manage macros vs key bindings separately:
    /console synchronizeConfig 0
    -- turns off synchronization of UI settings
    /console synchronizeBindings 0
    -- turns off synchronization of key bindings
    /console synchronizeMacros 0
    -- turns off synchronization of macros

    Whenever settings are downloaded from the server, the old settings are saved in <file>.old, so you can quickly log out, move them back into place and they'll be uploaded to the server (unless synchronizeSettings is 0).
    Enjoy folks.

    [Program] WoW Lua Enabler
  2. #137
    chrismcv's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Mmm just got a three day suspension with this O.o

    Used exactly as directed, a while after performing a few restricted commands my client decides to disconnect.

    I try to reconnect but it says my version of the client could not be verified, restart client, account banned (72 day suspension).

    Try this again about 30 minutes later with a new trial account, same thing.

    DETECTED!

    *EDIT

    Account Action: 72-Hour Account Suspension and Password Reset
    Reason for Action: Exploitation Policy Violation - Unapproved Third Party Software

    ^_^
    Last edited by chrismcv; 01-23-2009 at 11:17 PM.

  3. #138
    Cypher's Avatar Kynox's Sister's Pimp
    Reputation
    1358
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    5,368
    Thanks G/R
    0/6
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hahaha maybe a warden update. Epic win.

    If kynox isn't around I'll have a look into it, thanks for the heads up dude. Bad luck about your suspension too.

  4. #139
    chrismcv's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No worries mate, rather let you guys know before any one else cops a suspension or worse, a perm ban.

  5. #140
    Cypher's Avatar Kynox's Sister's Pimp
    Reputation
    1358
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    5,368
    Thanks G/R
    0/6
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    WARNING: This seems to be detected now, be very careful.

  6. #141
    kynox's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    830
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    888
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wow, i'm touched. Blizzard actually updated Warden for me!

    DO NOT USE THIS AT THIS TIME

  7. #142
    Lucifarius's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    10
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Man Blizzard are all over the public forum here. They REALLY want those functions to remain blocked. And with good reason. With this taken to the levels that allows LUA addons to call the functions too, an infallible bot (amoung other things)could be made, one to rule them all. Updating warden is not enough. A whole new dawn of professional bots could born from this idea/method/program.

    Kynox you really stumbled onto something big here and Blizz knows it.

  8. #143
    Cypher's Avatar Kynox's Sister's Pimp
    Reputation
    1358
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    5,368
    Thanks G/R
    0/6
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by kynox View Post
    Wow, i'm touched. Blizzard actually updated Warden for me!

    DO NOT USE THIS AT THIS TIME
    Join the club. Woot woot.

  9. #144
    Cypher's Avatar Kynox's Sister's Pimp
    Reputation
    1358
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    5,368
    Thanks G/R
    0/6
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by Lucifarius View Post
    Man Blizzard are all over the public forum here. They REALLY want those functions to remain blocked. And with good reason. With this taken to the levels that allows LUA addons to call the functions too, an infallible bot (amoung other things)could be made, one to rule them all. Updating warden is not enough. A whole new dawn of professional bots could born from this idea/method/program.

    Kynox you really stumbled onto something big here and Blizz knows it.

    I don't even think a facepalm collage will work against this post, I'm stumped.

    You do realize that there have been hacks like this ever since the introduction of the protected functions, right? Heck, even ISXWoW could call protected functions.

    This has been going on for yeeeeeearrrrssssssss, its not a new idea. Blizzard just refuse to hash all read-only memory for some retarded reason and just hash new offsets when a public hack pops up. Also, the function that protects LUA functions was already being checked by Warden, kynox just implemented the hack in a way that avoided the check so Blizzard responded with an updated warden.

    Please tell me, because I've always wondered... Is ignorance really bliss or does it actually suck?

    P.S. Your post is the equivalent of someone today saying "OMG I HAVE THE BEST IDEA!!! Lets make phones that are *huge pause* MOBILE!".

    P.S.S 2004 called, they want their idea back.

  10. #145
    jjaa's Avatar Contributor
    Reputation
    245
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    562
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Correct me if I am wrong...But to call protected LUA functions couldn’t you just call LUA_DoString from WoW's main thread and then...not really have to worry about warden...?


  11. #146
    Cypher's Avatar Kynox's Sister's Pimp
    Reputation
    1358
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    5,368
    Thanks G/R
    0/6
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by jjaa View Post
    Correct me if I am wrong...But to call protected LUA functions couldn’t you just call LUA_DoString from WoW's main thread and then...not really have to worry about warden...?


    If you just clear the global variable that signifies whether the function is being executed from secure (blizzard) or insecure (user) code that would work too.

    Obviously you'd have to be in the main thread though to avoid sync issues and race conditions.

  12. #147
    Lucifarius's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    10
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by Cypher View Post

    I don't even think a facepalm collage will work against this post, I'm stumped.

    You do realize that there have been hacks like this ever since the introduction of the protected functions, right? Heck, even ISXWoW could call protected functions.

    This has been going on for yeeeeeearrrrssssssss, its not a new idea. Blizzard just refuse to hash all read-only memory for some retarded reason and just hash new offsets when a public hack pops up. Also, the function that protects LUA functions was already being checked by Warden, kynox just implemented the hack in a way that avoided the check so Blizzard responded with an updated warden.

    Please tell me, because I've always wondered... Is ignorance really bliss or does it actually suck?

    P.S. Your post is the equivalent of someone today saying "OMG I HAVE THE BEST IDEA!!! Lets make phones that are *huge pause* MOBILE!".

    P.S.S 2004 called, they want their idea back.
    Seriously what the **** is your problem? I never claimed to have any idea let alone the best one. I was more or less repeating the sentiments that everyone else here did which can be summed up as "wow this little program opens up possibilities and has wide implications involving the easy creation of perfect bots, awesome." I know, shock and horror. WTF?

    I don't have all knowing nor even extensive knowledge about every hack that has ever been released for WoW but I have never come across something that simply allows someone to run protected api functions and given most people's either A. Confusion or B. Enthusiasm when this topic was posted I would be willing bet most people have not seen one before either. So get off my ****ing dick and think before you flame someone. Given it's simplicity, function and the fact that Blizzard is targeting it already kind points to the idea that yeah, it could be important. But hay I suppose only people with purple names can employ logic. I wont let it happen again Mr. leet meessage board person, I'm sorry.

    I never said anything was my idea here as you claim and you completely jumped the gun. Understanding the technical aspects of a game does not make one intelligent, clearly.
    Last edited by Lucifarius; 01-24-2009 at 06:29 AM.

  13. #148
    Xarg0's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    61
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    389
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by Cypher View Post

    I don't even think a facepalm collage will work against this post, I'm stumped.

    You do realize that there have been hacks like this ever since the introduction of the protected functions, right? Heck, even ISXWoW could call protected functions.

    This has been going on for yeeeeeearrrrssssssss, its not a new idea. Blizzard just refuse to hash all read-only memory for some retarded reason and just hash new offsets when a public hack pops up. Also, the function that protects LUA functions was already being checked by Warden, kynox just implemented the hack in a way that avoided the check so Blizzard responded with an updated warden.

    Please tell me, because I've always wondered... Is ignorance really bliss or does it actually suck?

    P.S. Your post is the equivalent of someone today saying "OMG I HAVE THE BEST IDEA!!! Lets make phones that are *huge pause* MOBILE!".

    P.S.S 2004 called, they want their idea back.
    They didn't get hashing the hole readonly memory of WoW to work without laggs I'd guess, or maybe they don't want to destroy gamehacking at all, but want us to keep our stuff private so the community belives they're doing something, might as well be an advertising trick, new hack->people cry->blizzard adds scann->people happy
    But that's all mere guessing, we'll never find out if Blizzard is just retarded or the devs have a secret fable for gamehacking *gg
    I hacked 127.0.0.1

  14. #149
    Cypher's Avatar Kynox's Sister's Pimp
    Reputation
    1358
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    5,368
    Thanks G/R
    0/6
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by Lucifarius View Post
    Seriously what the **** is your problem? I never claimed to have any idea let alone the best one. I was more or less repeating the sentiments that everyone else here did which can be summed up as "wow this little program opens up possibilities and has wide implications involving the easy creation of perfect bots, awesome." I know, shock and horror. WTF?

    I don't have all knowing nor even extensive knowledge about every hack that has ever been released for WoW but I have never come across something that simply allows someone to run protected api functions and given most people's either A. Confusion or B. Enthusiasm when this topic was posted I would be willing bet most people have not seen one before either. So get off my ****ing dick and think before you flame someone. Given it's simplicity, function and the fact that Blizzard is targeting it already kind points to the idea that yeah, it could be important. But hay I suppose only people with purple names can employ logic. I wont let it happen again Mr. leet meessage board person, I'm sorry.

    I never said anything was my idea here as you claim and you completely jumped the gun. Understanding the technical aspects of a game does not make one intelligent, clearly.
    So it's my fault you lack the knowledge necessary to make an informed post? My apologies, next time you feel the urge to post call me on my cell and I'll tutor you in the necessary topics.


    Originally Posted by Xarg0 View Post
    They didn't get hashing the hole readonly memory of WoW to work without laggs I'd guess, or maybe they don't want to destroy gamehacking at all, but want us to keep our stuff private so the community belives they're doing something, might as well be an advertising trick, new hack->people cry->blizzard adds scann->people happy
    But that's all mere guessing, we'll never find out if Blizzard is just retarded or the devs have a secret fable for gamehacking *gg
    The most likely actual explanation would probably be performance, but even that doesn't add up, they could easily run the scans in another thread with a low priority so the impact is minimal, but really, scanning the .text and .rdata sections as a whole would not cause any noticeable performance hit to begin with so I'd assume the real reason is just that their anti-hack team is lazy.

  15. #150
    r3d0gr3's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    1
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    well within two hours of using this program i get a nice email -
    * * * NOTICE OF FINAL WARNING * * * Account Name: DREADSKULL Account Action: 72-Hour Account Suspension and Password ResetReason for Action: Exploitation Policy Violation - Unapproved Third Party Software After a thorough investigation, we have found that a player of the account listed above has used unauthorized game modifications. The use of these modifications violates the World of Warcraft Terms of Use. We ask that you take a moment to review these terms at WoW -> Legal -> Terms of Use. You may not use cheats, bots, mods, hacks or any other software designed to gain an unfair advantage in World of Warcraft.

    just a heads up

Page 10 of 12 FirstFirst ... 6789101112 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. [Release] PLua Patcher - Patch WoW to enable protected LUA functions
    By wiirgi in forum World of Warcraft Bots and Programs
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-18-2012, 10:01 PM
  2. [Program] WoW Jumper AntiAFK Script
    By Cypher in forum World of Warcraft Bots and Programs
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-23-2006, 10:38 PM
  3. [Program] WoW AV AFK Bot
    By Cypher in forum World of Warcraft Bots and Programs
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-22-2006, 05:04 AM
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 PM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3
Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Google Authenticator verification provided by Two-Factor Authentication (Free) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Digital Point modules: Sphinx-based search