Nice post but imo playing wow on minimum is really crap so even lower would destroy it for me but good nevertheless.
Nice post but imo playing wow on minimum is really crap so even lower would destroy it for me but good nevertheless.
If you need me you have my skype, if you don't have my skype then you don't need me.
I run at 50-60fps with ultra (minus shadows) settings. Macbook Pro ftw.
This'll help with my crappy, 1GB ram modeledit test PC. haha
Dragon[Sky] can get into our signatures, AND our pants.
I wasn't aware post count effected my knowledge of any subject.
In fact, it's quite the contrary, but since you seem slightly primitive and rather misfortunate I wont link a reference. Instead, I'll quote it ..it's not like a citation is need to prove a non-perplexing fact.
Please omit your weak presumption and move on.When a computer connects to another computer using TCP it performs what is known as the TCP Three-way Handshake. what happens is this:
1. Client computer sends a SYN (synchronize) packet to the server computer
2. Server computer sends a SYN-ACK (SYN-acknowledged) packet to the client computer
3. Client computer sends a final ACK (ACK acknowledged packet to the server computer.
Thus begins the TCP connection.
All these SYN, SYN-ACK, and ACK packets carry no actual data. The Windows network stack, since Windows 2000 has, by default, only responded to every other TCP SYN packet unless additional data packets are not received within a specific period of time (per RFC-1122). This reduces the total number of non-data packets that must be sent. Changing the referenced registry value to 1 will cause Windows to respond to every SYN packet, thus doubling the TCP overhead for a connection. While this will likely improve the "ping" rating you get in online games (since it takes a SYN packet less time to be ACKed) it will not increase the actual speeds of data transfer but reduce it.
Who wants lower graphic then minimum?
Then i would rather play whit lagg.
Game Booster | Fast Game Accelerator | Free Accelerator
I'll just leave this here... Also running regular disk defrag's should also help I believe..
Ye.Anyway, thanks for feedbacks :]