Infinite Gbank Withdrawals [SCREENSHOT]

[ron84]

So, yes.
Another discovery :P

1. Withdraw an item from your guild's bank.
2. Log out
3. Log in
4. ???
5. Return to guild bank, withdraw again.
6. Rinse + repeat.

Notes:
This was all done at the Gadgetzan guild bank.
I only receive one withdrawal per day.

Screenie:

this is exactly like my post a several month ago which post the original way and an alternative way for when it was hotfixed.
http://www.mmowned.com/forums/world-...ml#post1723418

not sure why people are saying he found this. It's just being posted again on a different patch.

[Cheat'R]

this is exactly like my post a several month ago which post the original way and an alternative way for when it was hotfixed.
http://www.mmowned.com/forums/world-...ml#post1723418

not sure why people are saying he found this. It's just being posted again on a different patch.

Oh? So I just happened to look back several months to test exploits in the current patch?
No. I found this. If I hadn't posted this, nobody would know that it was working again.

Not to mention half the people on your thread said it didn't work.

[ron84]

Oh? So I just happened to look back several months to test exploits in the current patch?
No. I found this. If I hadn't posted this, nobody would know that it was working again.

Not to mention half the people on your thread said it didn't work.

So with this reasoning you're saying that its ok to repost, that people shouldn't use the search. Just because it was posted several month ago doesnt mean anything. You could have just bumped the thread by posting " this still works" or whatever you wish to post to agree with.

Saying that half the people are replying that "it didn't work"; did it ever come time mind that when/what date they responded to it? on page 5 with a recent post(at that day) on Oct 2010 someone agreed that it still worked but then hotfixed that same day.

It only takes a search and a reply for the topic to get pushed up and then as you said "nobody would know that it was working again." afterward they will.

[aganbagan]

Amazing, you just said: "When a new patch applies, and I say it works to do this exploit in this patch" Its your find? I dont really know whats cooking in your head but it aint alot.

[darkriderking]

Its noticed if you withdraw too much, so yes a GM will take back the items if you over-withdraw

i mailed the items to my alt so the GM was sol and couldnt take them from my mail XD

[Kazin420]

I think you guys are taking this a little too seriously.

I'm reminded of how every once in a while blizz will release a new huge patch, and wallwalking will suddenly work again. Usually, someone will post up a thread saying "wallwalking works again!" and they get a ton of rep for it, even though the exploit has existed for a long time. Why? because they found out that it works in whatever current patch is out.

Its a lot easier to read a new thread than to sift through 5 pages of an old one with people saying "hotfixed" "oh this works again" "hotfixed again" "now it works!"

I'm not saying you should go around reposting random stuff all the time. I'm just saying that if something was fixed a long time ago, and now it works again, its not the worst thing in the world to post a new thread.

[TSBowsta]

An exploit is an exploit. Nice find. +rep.

[ron84]

I understand what you're saying Kazin and i agree with you that looking through all the pages is just boring to read or just being lazy to do. But lets say several month have passed for example and i repost it again on a later date (lets say 10 month from now) I will or may get an infraction for posting again instead of just replying again and this may go with other finds as well which infractions will add up and eventually may lead to a ban or suspension. I'm aware that i may be blowing this out of proportion but i would like to continue viewing this site without disobeying the rules.


Edit: Just to clear this up, the only thing i was responding about the OP was they way he edited from what he originally posted. At first i didn't mind what he put because it was completely different from what i posted way back. I thought that was pretty nice but to change it up several hours later, that is when i decided to say "repost".

His original consisted of withdrawing from bank, Queueing up for a bg, Winning the BG (although he did say he never lost, but was going to check if losing affected it too), and going back to bank to withdraw again since apparently that reseted the count. This is what i thought was pretty nice find. Something completely different method.

[Cheat'R]

I understand what you're saying Kazin and i agree with you that looking through all the pages is just boring to read or just being lazy to do. But lets say several month have passed for example and i repost it again on a later date (lets say 10 month from now) I will or may get an infraction for posting again instead of just replying again and this may go with other finds as well which infractions will add up and eventually may lead to a ban or suspension. I'm aware that i may be blowing this out of proportion but i would like to continue viewing this site without disobeying the rules.


Edit: Just to clear this up, the only thing i was responding about the OP was they way he edited from what he originally posted. At first i didn't mind what he put because it was completely different from what i posted way back. I thought that was pretty nice but to change it up several hours later, that is when i decided to say "repost".

His original consisted of withdrawing from bank, Queueing up for a bg, Winning the BG (although he did say he never lost, but was going to check if losing affected it too), and going back to bank to withdraw again since apparently that reseted the count. This is what i thought was pretty nice find. Something completely different method.

I would be willing to bet that you would be more likely to receive an infraction for necro-posting than you would for posting that a fixed exploit now works.

Also, I discovered that logging out and back in resets the count after reading replies in the thread. Therefore, I changed the method because it was less of a hassle to perform the exploit.

[ramble]

nice find, i have no idea if it works but i +rep anyways.

[Cheat'R]

nice find, i have no idea if it works but i +rep anyways.

Thank you. And it does work

[Pyrobover]

nice, hope gm wont do anything
+rep!

[Inexx]

nice, hope gm wont do anything
+rep!

They will do somehthing if it gets reported to a Game Master that u have been taking stuff from the guildback. Otherwise not, so make it smooth. Take a few things a day instead of everything the first day :-)

[Forgiving]

nice find mate, i could see this becoming somewhat useful

[seba2011]

this === th