Gathering Profession level reqs 3.0.3

[Curtisblank]

Actually there was no requirement prior to 3.0.2 then they added one and twinks were complaining about new twinks not being able to get it so they re-removed it in 3.0.3.

[Christina]

Actually there was no requirement prior to 3.0.2 then they added one and twinks were complaining about new twinks not being able to get it so they re-removed it in 3.0.3.

I only speak English. Breaking down your mass of crap to try to decipher what on earth your talking about.

"Actually, they first introduced the level requirement along with 3.0.2. People started complaining about older twinks, and how they still had these professions which were no longer obtainable as a twink. As a result they ended up removing the requirement again with 3.0.3."

Is this what you meant?

Blizzard doesn't give a flying shit about twinks and their complaining.

Even if that's right, what does that have to do with my post at all? The point is there is no level requirement NOW! Why would anyone care if fit was then wasn't again? The whole point is you can go level up your herb to 375 at any level which wasn't possible previously.

[Curtisblank]

I only speak English. Breaking down your mass of crap to try to decipher what on earth your talking about.

"Actually, they first introduced the level requirement along with 3.0.2. People started complaining about older twinks, and how they still had these professions which were no longer obtainable as a twink. As a result they ended up removing the requirement again with 3.0.3."

Is this what you meant?

Blizzard doesn't give a flying shit about twinks and their complaining.

Even if that's right, what does that have to do with my post at all? The point is there is no level requirement NOW! Why would anyone care if fit was then wasn't again? The whole point is you can go level up your herb to 375 at any level which wasn't possible previously.

Since you were so kind in your response, i'll explain my point. See the bolded part, I was just pointing out that it is inaccurate. I'm not saying Blizzard said they changed it becuase of twinks alone, I just know for a fact that on the PTR when they added the passive buffs there was a post on the WOW forums from a 19 twink named Madock who pointed out to Blizzard that it was a bad idea to add the passive buff becuase twinks would use that loophole. If you weren't posting this to help out low levels/people who twink then why did you post it at all, no one besides twinks would waste their time maxing out a profession instead of progressing through the game and leveling it as they go or getting to 70 and then working on it. Oh and I think it is you're not your, and if it, not if fit. Next time don't be such a tool I was just trying to inform people of the facts.

Edit: Link just for fun.

http://forums.wow-europe.com/thread....708531&sid=1#0

[Christina]

(1)Since you were so kind in your response, i'll explain my point. (2)See the bolded part, I was just pointing out that it is inaccurate. I'm not saying Blizzard said they changed it becuase of twinks alone, I just know for a fact that on the PTR when they added the passive buffs there was a post on the WOW forums from a 19 twink named Madock who pointed out to Blizzard that it was a bad idea to add the passive buff becuase twinks would use that loophole. (3)If you weren't posting this to help out low levels/people who twink then why did you post it at all, (4)no one besides twinks would waste their time maxing out a profession instead of progressing through the game and leveling it as they go or getting to 70 and then working on it. (5)Oh and I think it is you're not your, and if it, not if fit. Next time don't be such a tool I was (6)just trying to inform people of the facts.

Edit: Link just for fun.

World of Warcraft (en) Forums ->

Aww.. Did I make the leecher mad? Worst part is I had to read your wall of text, which in the end had nothing of importance.

1) Thank you
2) Nope, that's true. Read the patch notes.
3) I never said I didn't care about twinks.
4) Which is why I posted this, glad we can agree on something.
5) Very observant of you!
6) Appreciate that, thanks

[Morag]

I though you 'were done with this site' Christina3d? lol

but nice find

[omg123]

nice find but chill some man.

[Christina]

I though you 'were done with this site' Christina3d? lol

but nice find

I was done, for about an hour then I realized ILU noobs. <3 XOXO

nice find but chill some woman.

If I get any chiller, I'm gonna kill you, MAN.

[jarza]

Nice find, although I can imagine it will be hard leveling your herbalism to 450, you're going to have to get your lvl 19 twink into a lvl 75 zone...

[Christina]

Nice find, although I can imagine it will be hard leveling your herbalism to 450, you're going to have to get your lvl 19 twink into a lvl 75 zone...

Actually, You would have to be lower then 19 because you would level from the exploring.

But I agree, It's gonna suck getting ganked repeatedly, will most likely need assistance to get it done in a timely manner.

[Curtisblank]

Pray that you have a Lock for a friend that will spend countless hours summoning you to the nodes to keep you from getting exploration XP.

[Curtisblank]

Aww.. Did I make the leecher mad? Worst part is I had to read your wall of text, which in the end had nothing of importance.

1) Thank you
2) Nope, that's true. Read the patch notes.
3) I never said I didn't care about twinks.
4) Which is why I posted this, glad we can agree on something.
5) Very observant of you!
6) Appreciate that, thanks

Although it may seem that I am here to argue with you, let me assure you that i'm not. You posted "The whole point is you can go level up your herb to 375 at any level which wasn't possible previously."

This WAS possible prior to 3.0.2. They added the level requirements 3.0.2 and for whatever reason they removed them again in 3.0.3. Look up Darnn from Elune, Gaaz from No Mercy guild on Argent Dawn. Ice from Dead on Arrival from Elune, they all got some of their gathering to at least 275 or so, that way when they patched it in 3.0.2 they could still get to the 300 mark, I was too lazy on my rogue, now I guess I get to do it as well.

[wuwut]

lol at dongs. great post. +Rep

[Christina]

Although it may seem that I am here to argue with you, let me assure you that i'm not. You posted "The whole point is you can go level up your herb to 375 at any level which wasn't possible previously."

This WAS possible prior to 3.0.2. They added the level requirements 3.0.2 and for whatever reason they removed them again in 3.0.3. Look up Darnn from Elune, Gaaz from No Mercy guild on Argent Dawn. Ice from Dead on Arrival from Elune, they all got some of their gathering to at least 275 or so, that way when they patched it in 3.0.2 they could still get to the 300 mark, I was too lazy on my rogue, now I guess I get to do it as well.

Your going in circles and saying nothing of importance. It WASN"T possible previously, because previously it was 3.0.2 (and you couldn't).

Now stop arguing with me considering your clearly not up for the challenge since you keep bringing up the fact that you indeed could not to this before 3.0.3 because it was removed in 3.0.2! The whole point is you CAN do it now (3.0.3) and COULDN"T do it before (3.0.2)

All further leecher posts from you will be ignored until you prove your craps worth wasting my time.

lol at dongs. great post. +Rep

Thank you, glad you enjoyed it.

[Curtisblank]

Your going in circles and saying nothing of importance. It WASN"T possible previously, because previously it was 3.0.2 (and you couldn't).

Now stop arguing with me considering your clearly not up for the challenge since you keep bringing up the fact that you indeed could not to this before 3.0.3 because it was removed in 3.0.2! The whole point is you CAN do it now (3.0.3) and COULDN"T do it before (3.0.2)

All further leecher posts from you will be ignored until you prove your craps worth wasting my time.



Thank you, glad you enjoyed it.

It was PREVIOUSLY possible becuase the definition of previously is......
previously
adv : at an earlier time or formerly, Abraham Lincoln was previously a President.

So previously doesn't just count the prior patch, becuase previously to 3.0.2 or 3.0.3 I know someone who leveled there gathering on their 19 twink that got these buffs when they were released. So it was available PREVIOUSLY. Prior to 3.0.2 (which is an earlier time) than the curent 3.03. it WAS available. I'm glad that you speak English but please be sure that you understand the definition of he words you speak or choose a different word. There is no point in arguing over this really either way just pointing out the fact that by the words you used you were inaccurate.

[Christina]

It was PREVIOUSLY possible becuase the definition of previously is......
previously
adv : at an earlier time or formerly, Abraham Lincoln was previously a President.

So previously doesn't just count the prior patch, becuase previously to 3.0.2 or 3.0.3 I know someone who leveled there gathering on their 19 twink that got these buffs when they were released. So it was available PREVIOUSLY. Prior to 3.0.2 (which is an earlier time) than the curent 3.03. it WAS available. I'm glad that you speak English but please be sure that you understand the definition of he words you speak or choose a different word. There is no point in arguing over this really either way just pointing out the fact that by the words you used you were inaccurate.

If you continue I will report you for trolling.