[Discussion/Questions] Difference Between ArcEmu and Ascent? menu

Shout-Out

User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25
  1. #1
    Mango Jerry's Avatar Banned
    Reputation
    192
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,244
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    [Discussion/Questions] Difference Between ArcEmu and Ascent?

    Discussion/Questions: Difference Between ArcEmu and Ascent!
    * The Difference Between ArcEmu and Ascent *

    Discussion/Questions:

    - Good things about ArcEmu and Ascent?
    - Wich Emu is best? ArcEmu or Ascent?

    - Which Emu do you Recommend for Users/Beginners?
    - Why do you Recommend that Emu?

    - What is the bad thing about ArcEmu and/or Ascent?
    - What do you think is the bad thing about ArcEmu and/or Ascent?
    - What is the good things about ArcEmu and/or Ascent?

    - Which Emu is the Easiest to Setup? ArcEmu or Ascent?
    - Why is that one the Easiest to Setup?

    - Which Emu is the most Stable? ArcEmu or Ascent?
    - Why is that one Stable?

    - Which Emu has less Bugs in Northrend etc? ArcEmu or Ascent?
    - What is the Bugs on ArcEmu or Ascent?
    - Do you think that they'll be fixable in the Future?

    - For how long have you been using ArcEmu or Ascent?
    - Why do you use the Emu?
    - How many Stars to you give the Emu-Team?
    - Why so many Stars?

    - What is the exact Difference between ArcEmu and Ascent?
    - Why are they Different?
    - Why are some of the Unstable and some of the are Stable?


    * Thank you for Joining and for Answering! *
    Last edited by Mango Jerry; 02-05-2009 at 03:50 PM.

    [Discussion/Questions] Difference Between ArcEmu and Ascent?
  2. #2
    2dgreengiant's Avatar ★ Elder ★


    Reputation
    1192
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    7,129
    Thanks G/R
    1/3
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Don't even dare to flame in this thread or you will be removed.

    edit: You can't really define which is better tbh
    If you need me you have my skype, if you don't have my skype then you don't need me.

  3. #3
    Mango Jerry's Avatar Banned
    Reputation
    192
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,244
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah i know, 2d.
    I just wanna hear other people's opinions/answers about ArcEmu and Ascent.

  4. #4
    latruwski's Avatar Banned
    Reputation
    647
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    2,456
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Technically Ascent is dead, allthough there are some people working on/with it underground
    Now there is AspireDev

    (checking questions)

    - Good things about ArcEmu and Ascent?
    Arcemu, AspireDev, OpenAscent all are derived from Ascent/Antrix
    Good things: Stability, Capacity(players), easy to use

    - Wich Emu is best? ArcEmu or AspireDev?
    Since both are derived from Ascent, there is no big difference... allthough now i think AspireDev is ahead of Arcemu...

    - Which Emu do you Recommend for Users/Beginners?
    Well both are exacly the same (as far as running and source is 75% the same)... so any of them is OK
    If you talk about Mangos, Arcemu, AspireDev and Kobold i would advice AspireDev or Arcemu...
    - Why do you Recommend that Emu?
    It is very easy to use and there are way more repacks/funstuff for it also to support beginners...
    There is a good dev team behind it and both of them have daily updates.
    - What is the bad thing about ArcEmu and/or Ascent?
    Arcemu: copypaste emu like a lot of developers call it... the core is a little less stable then AspireDev and AspireDev kept its structure nicer.
    Nothing of your concern if you are a beginner and not thinking about core-editing.
    - What do you think is the bad thing about ArcEmu and/or Ascent?
    Arcemu has a lot of 14 year olds in the community that talk crap (14 year olds = figuraly)
    AspireDev also has some of these kids (who hasn't? even mmowned has)
    - Which Emu is the Easiest to Setup? ArcEmu or Ascent?
    Both are almost exacly 100% the same... there are just small differences in the config files (extra options etc) So both of them are the same level of difficulty to setup
    - Why is that one the Easiest to Setup?
    /
    - Which Emu is the most Stable? ArcEmu or Ascent?
    AspireDev a little more stable maybe, but you can't tell the difference...
    - Why is that one Stable?
    Less copy-paste and more structure
    - Which Emu has less Bugs in Northrend etc? ArcEmu or Ascent?
    Hard tosay, both have nice things working... AspireDev worked on new systems for the emulator (scripting etc), Arcemu has done its share...
    They both have a lot of things worked on, can't really tell wich one of them has 'most'
    - What is the Bugs on ArcEmu or Ascent?
    If you want me to write down all the bugs then you better prepare for a post of 1000 pages Every emulator has thousands and thousands of bugs... A lot of them are small bugs, but there are big ones too
    - Do you think that they'll be fixable in the Future?
    Every bug is fixable... the thing is if you fix one bug (editing a part of code) you could be making 10 new bugs... that is the hard thing about programming with sources like these... everything is combined so if you touch one thing, you touch 20 things
    But yes i do think both of these emulators have a very nice future and will solve a lot of the bigger bugs
    - For how long have you been using ArcEmu or Ascent?
    Used Antrix then Ascent all the way... used Arcemu after that for a while and now using AspireDev 24/7
    - Why do you use the Emu?
    Becuz my friend/developer Aceindy is working on that project and becuz i see more potential in it
    - How many Stars to you give the Emu-Team?
    AspireDev: 8
    Arcemu: 6
    if 10 was max
    - Why so many Stars?
    Explained most of it already
    - What is the exact Difference between ArcEmu and Ascent?
    The difference is that both projects went their own way.... so they both have new features, other teams, other fixes, ....
    But they look a lot like eachother becuz they derive from the same emulator.
    - Why are they Different?
    Becuz the 2 teams went their own way... they both started making new features, developing new stuff etc... in their own way
    - Why are some of the Unstable and some of the are Stable?
    If you see unstable serves then most likely it is a funserver or repack server... those are the most unstable ones.
    Some revisions could be more stable then others too... simply becuz of the source that is edited... if devs made a small mistake it could cause instability for example (way more examples then that though)
    Last edited by latruwski; 02-05-2009 at 06:10 PM.

  5. #5
    Clain's Avatar Banned
    Reputation
    179
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,396
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Really... the only difference between Arcemu and Ascent is that Arcemu has more bugs fixed and features added. Andy does the packet cracking and all that for Ascent then Arcemu just uses that to update their emulator and keep adding on to it as where Arcemu has a larger development team(24ish people).

  6. #6
    Vindicated's Avatar Contributor
    Reputation
    226
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,067
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^^ Clain is right. Aceindy does all the stuff for AspireCore, then ArcEmu rips it . I personally like Ascent better, but it's harder upkeep.

    Edit by Gastricpenguin: Not proven
    Last edited by Gastricpenguin; 02-06-2009 at 02:14 PM. Reason: Not proven


  7. #7
    fastelf's Avatar Active Member
    Reputation
    44
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    279
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^^ Arcemu does not rip it, the last thing they ever ripped was the crash fix that occured in 3.0.8.

    Lots of people think they rip it.. merely because they just do not like the developers, they never take a step back to see what they are actually doing.

    This is why i use arcemu, i support them, unlike other people who choose to say stuff about the other emulators.

    When it comes down too it, you cannot say your emu is better then another, unless it is better in absolutely every single way, which no emulator is.

    I like arcemu for the reason that its easy to setup, and you can get help for almost anything on their forums or IRC channel.

    Besides,

    If this Leaf emulator turns out to be real, and as good as it says it is, all other emulators for WoW will either terminate, or join to try and make a better one.

    That is what i think.

  8. #8
    RyeRye's Avatar Contributor
    Reputation
    240
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    996
    Thanks G/R
    0/1
    Trade Feedback
    3 (100%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I didn't even know Ascent was still around?

    I think it died a few months back. And Antrix has been gone (Just felt to need to say that :P)

    So there working on it underground?



  9. #9
    Clain's Avatar Banned
    Reputation
    179
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,396
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not going off subject but@Fastelf: "LeafEmu" for the most part isn't real, remember the release date for it on that site? Yeah well I'm pretty sure thats passed by now. There was already another thread about people laughing about it on emupedia :/ The next idiots are at Apex Emulator

    @RyeRye: Its pretty much dead, of course I'm sure Andy will keep updating client versions between patches.

  10. #10
    Gastricpenguin's Avatar Legendary
    Reputation
    980
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,236
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    - Good things about ArcEmu and Ascent?
    Superior uptime, great stability, many bugs are fixed weekly, etc.

    - Wich Emu is best? ArcEmu or Ascent?
    Both are derived from Antrix. ArcEmu has a larger development team and has many more featuers added.

    - Which Emu do you Recommend for Users/Beginners?
    ArcEmu. Configuration files have been made for beginner and advanced users. There are plenty of guides that use ArcEmu in their setup.

    - Why do you Recommend that Emu?
    Look above.
    Life Puzzler WoW - Website | Forums

  11. #11
    mager1794's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    356
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    703
    Thanks G/R
    0/1
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well Personally

    I feel arcemu is the best they have a good development team
    good project management and organization
    everyone on the forums are helpful and you get replys in like a hour or a bit more
    and i've been using arcemu since it first came out and
    well i just like the community and the people and i could never leave

    plus there pretty stable and always updating and Not to mention
    they have arcscript working hard to get all the mobs scripted
    All in All arcemu is probably the best Emulator for begineers
    Lunar Gaming - Reaching For The Stars

  12. #12
    Mango Jerry's Avatar Banned
    Reputation
    192
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,244
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thank you for the long and explained Comments from ya all.
    Good to hear that allmost everyone is using ArcEmu.

  13. #13
    777devil777's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    66
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    396
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by RyeRye View Post
    I didn't even know Ascent was still around?

    I think it died a few months back. And Antrix has been gone (Just felt to need to say that :P)

    So there working on it underground?
    It didn't die that long ago, I'm personally still using Ascent for 3.0.3 til I can change my DB to work with Arc.

    Edit @ OP: There isn't much of a diffrence between Antrix derivatives. Ascent was privatized not too long ago by one of the main guys, and then the project split up and updates got slower. Ascent is pretty much dead (But its still being updated, but more like a pet project).

    Of course theres still Mangos which alot of people seem to ignore, which has been around for a long time and is constantly updated. The only downside to mangos is a bit more 'sloppy' coding, but it really isn't that bad.
    Last edited by 777devil777; 02-10-2009 at 02:21 PM.

    "I am a hacker, and this is my manifesto. You may stop this individual, but you can't stop us all... after all, we're all alike."

  14. #14
    Henkke's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    26
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    287
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by 777devil777 View Post
    The only downside to mangos is a bit more 'sloppy' coding, but it really isn't that bad.
    Well, now when you look at ascent derivatives, aspire, arcemu, the sloppy coding seems to affect them more than mangos atm. Ascents code was nice when burlex was doing it, but from that it's been going into pretty messy way.

  15. #15
    Algorithm's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    175
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    395
    Thanks G/R
    0/1
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think there is a big difference.

    If we take an example such:

    Hearthstone (Aspire) and Arcemu those are 2 different emulators even if they were all based of Ascent.

    No flame intended:

    Arcemu uses much more CPU and memory Vs Hearthstone.

    I have quad core xeon 3.0 and my cpu usage on start up with ArcEmu jumps sometimes to 90% and during the online performance it uses at least 25% more of CPU then Hearthstone. In overall performance wise i prefer Aspire. A lot of spells and procs are working correctly. Very smooth run.
    However Hearthstone is more trickier its a bit more complicated, after the addition of Tr1 support its more trickier with custom scripts.

    Arcemu is a good emu no doubt about it. Its very good for smaller servers, they have all scripts projects for instances and more funserver options. Very easy to install and compile, a lot of spells are being fixed. The development is on the right track.
    Last edited by Algorithm; 02-14-2009 at 12:38 AM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-15-2014, 10:57 PM
  2. Difference between CastSpellByID() and CastSpellByName(GetSpellInfo())
    By MrHeroe in forum WoW Bots Questions & Requests
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-07-2013, 08:42 PM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-24-2012, 10:22 AM
  4. How does Blizz tell difference between Powerleveling and hackers?
    By Marodox in forum World of Warcraft General
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-22-2012, 07:24 PM
  5. [Noob] What are the major differences between Mangos and Arcemu ?
    By Belmorte in forum WoW EMU Questions & Requests
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-03-2009, 01:19 AM
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 AM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3
Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Google Authenticator verification provided by Two-Factor Authentication (Free) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Digital Point modules: Sphinx-based search