[1.12] Trouble with ClntObjMgrObjectPtr calling convention menu

User Tag List

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Saridormi's Avatar Contributor
    Reputation
    307
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    556
    Thanks G/R
    19/17
    Trade Feedback
    1 (100%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    [1.12] Trouble with ClntObjMgrObjectPtr calling convention

    Hi, I'm trying to call ClntObjMgrObjectPtr (0x468460) but I don't understand the calling convention

    Looking at the disassembly, it looks like it has this signature to

    uintptr_t __fastcall ClntObjMgrObjectPtr(uint64_t guid, int32_t filter)

    However:

    If I call it as shown above, esi and esp are not equal after the function has been called, causing a run-time exception
    If I call it as __stdcall instead, it doesn't throw a runtime exception but it also doesn't work, as junk gets passed to ecx (the filter argument)

    Is there a way for me to declare this function in such a way that Visual Studio can generate the correct assembly for me? I'd really like to avoid using raw assembly wherever possible

    Here is an example of correct assembly calling this function (edx is completely unused):

    Code:
    .text:00482CE1                 push    eax
    .text:00482CE2                 push    ecx
    .text:00482CE3                 mov     edx, offset aEBuildBuild_33 ; "E:\\build\\buildWoW\\WoW\\Source\\Ui\\W"...
    .text:00482CE8                 mov     ecx, 1
    .text:00482CED                 call    ClntObjMgrObjectPtr
    Thanks!

    EDIT: I also tried calling it as __thiscall, as suggested here: http://www.ownedcore.com/forums/worl...ml#post2105431 ([WoW] 1.12.1.5875 Info Dump Thread)

    This also causes a run-time error to occur, using signature

    Code:
    uint32_t(__thiscall *WoWFunc_GetObjectByGuid)(int32_t filter, uint64_t guid);
    Last edited by Saridormi; 06-23-2016 at 10:10 PM.


    [1.12] Trouble with ClntObjMgrObjectPtr calling convention
  2. #2
    namreeb's Avatar Legendary

    Reputation
    668
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,029
    Thanks G/R
    8/222
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    While it may technically be __fastcall, I don't believe it actually does anything with ecx or edx. Therefore, you can call it as __stdcall with a signature like:

    uintptr_t __stdcall ClntObjMgrObjectPtr(unsigned __int64 guid)

    That should work, but be warned I am doing it from memory.

  3. Thanks Saridormi (1 members gave Thanks to namreeb for this useful post)
  4. #3
    Saridormi's Avatar Contributor
    Reputation
    307
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    556
    Thanks G/R
    19/17
    Trade Feedback
    1 (100%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by namreeb View Post
    While it may technically be __fastcall, I don't believe it actually does anything with ecx or edx. Therefore, you can call it as __stdcall with a signature like:

    uintptr_t __stdcall ClntObjMgrObjectPtr(unsigned __int64 guid)

    That should work, but be warned I am doing it from memory.
    Thanks for the reply

    Calling it as __stdcall doesn't crash the client, but whatever is passed to ecx sometimes causes a check inside the function to fail

    The check appears to read the object type from the object descriptor and then does a test and jnz against ecx. If it doesn't jump, 0 (nullptr) is returned

    edx is indeed useless, it is overwritten before being read


  5. #4
    shauren's Avatar Established Member
    Reputation
    65
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    60
    Thanks G/R
    2/28
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ClntObjMgrObjectPtr takes 4 arguments, 2 of them are for debugging
    int typemask,
    uint64_t guid
    int line,
    char const* file

    Arg order is different in newer builds but from the disassembly part you posted 1.12 seems to be something like this
    CGObject_C* __fastcall ClntObjMgrObjectPtr(int typemask, char const* file, [guid], [line]) -- no idea about order of the last 2 just from that tiny asm snippet
    Last edited by shauren; 06-24-2016 at 01:18 AM.

  6. Thanks Saridormi (1 members gave Thanks to shauren for this useful post)
  7. #5
    namreeb's Avatar Legendary

    Reputation
    668
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,029
    Thanks G/R
    8/222
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I checked my IDB file for the 1.12.1 client. You were right. Here is the prototype, and just because it's short and sweet, the whole function:

    Code:
    CGObject_C *__fastcall ClntObjMgrObjectPtr(unsigned int typeMask, const char *fileName, unsigned __int64 guid)
    {
      CGObject_C *result; // eax@1
    
      result = GetObjectPtr(guid);
      if ( result )
      {
        if ( !(typeMask & result->Descriptors[OBJECT_FIELD_TYPE]) )
          result = NULL;
      }
      return result;
    }
    Edit: If you wanted to simplify things, you could also call GetObjectPtr() (0x464870) directly:

    Code:
    CGObject_C *__stdcall GetObjectPtr(unsigned __int64 guid)
    {
      CGObject_C *result; // eax@2
    
      if ( guid )
        result = FindActiveObj(guid);
      else
        result = NULL;
      return result;
    }
    Last edited by namreeb; 06-24-2016 at 01:23 AM.

  8. Thanks Saridormi, lolp1 (2 members gave Thanks to namreeb for this useful post)
  9. #6
    Saridormi's Avatar Contributor
    Reputation
    307
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    556
    Thanks G/R
    19/17
    Trade Feedback
    1 (100%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by shauren View Post
    ClntObjMgrObjectPtr takes 4 arguments, 2 of them are for debugging
    int typemask,
    uint64_t guid
    int line,
    char const* file

    Arg order is different in newer builds but from the disassembly part you posted 1.12 seems to be something like this
    CGObject_C* __fastcall ClntObjMgrObjectPtr(int typemask, char const* file, [guid], [line]) -- no idea about order of the last 2 just from that tiny asm snippet
    This worked perfectly, thank you! +5 rep

    Which debug builds are you referring to specifically? (And are there any binaries readily available for them?)


  10. #7
    shauren's Avatar Established Member
    Reputation
    65
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    60
    Thanks G/R
    2/28
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Most recently mac x64 6.0.1.18719, mac 4.1.0.13850 or the very old old win 1.0.0.3368 with pdb, see this thread
    http://www.ownedcore.com/forums/worl...lease-ptr.html ([WoW] Binary Collection (Release & PTR))

  11. Thanks Saridormi (1 members gave Thanks to shauren for this useful post)

Similar Threads

  1. Having some trouble with making my server public without hamachi.
    By Life_Hero in forum World of Warcraft Emulator Servers
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-25-2007, 06:20 AM
  2. Trouble with custom item for my antrix server.
    By phc_chaos in forum World of Warcraft Emulator Servers
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-14-2007, 02:31 PM
  3. Trouble with Human Male -> Orc male
    By warningfromspace in forum WoW ME Questions and Requests
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-11-2007, 05:38 PM
  4. [Question] Trouble with Helm Fix
    By PhyrreFly in forum WoW ME Questions and Requests
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-13-2007, 10:35 AM
  5. Trouble with MyWarcraftStudio, help greatly appreciated
    By kekburtbhkeke in forum WoW ME Questions and Requests
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-28-2007, 05:22 PM
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 PM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3
Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Google Authenticator verification provided by Two-Factor Authentication (Free) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Digital Point modules: Sphinx-based search