Instantly changing direction (rotation) == ban or not?

[Cursed]

Exactly what I thought, all that happens is that you're rotated client-side and then the new facing is sent to the server in the next movement packet. No harm no foul.

I assume Malu is doing it in some weird way?

Crazy AutoIt programmers always doing weird shit to avoid language restricitons. YOUNG HOOLIGANS! GET OFF MY LAWN AND LEARN A REAL LANGUAGE! AND GET A HAIRCUT YOU HIPIPE!

Wah! Chaz made a typo! I just lost my faith in humanity

[/SARCASM]

[UnknOwned]

Gad... Curse me!!!
I must have been doing something wierd then..

[Cursed]

You have been Cursed

[kynox]

I wonder if there is some kind of "null" movement packets to force facing cahnges to be send to server (ie: change facing, send/call "null" movement packet/function w/o actual movement).

It's called CMSG_SET_FACING.

[ostapus]

It's called CMSG_SET_FACING.

let me make more clear (sry for english)... right now, for facing i am directly modifying facing value. as already been pointed this leads to some issue as to sync model position w/ server information about positioning.. to fix that, right after value changing i have to call movement functions (ie MoveForwardStart following MoveForwardStop) to "adjust/send" internal facing info to server. I dont like this way (due some other issues) and was trying to find how to change facing w/o further calls of MoveXXXX function... Unknown (thank to him) point me to dig out CTM (click-to-move) function... and right now i am trying to find/figure out how to use this info

[Cypher]

let me make more clear (sry for english)... right now, for facing i am directly modifying facing value. as already been pointed this leads to some issue as to sync model position w/ server information about positioning.. to fix that, right after value changing i have to call movement functions (ie MoveForwardStart following MoveForwardStop) to "adjust/send" internal facing info to server. I dont like this way (due some other issues) and was trying to find how to change facing w/o further calls of MoveXXXX function... Unknown (thank to him) point me to dig out CTM (click-to-move) function... and right now i am trying to find/figure out how to use this info

Why not just send the packet he told you to?

[ostapus]

Why not just send the packet he told you to?

well, i am trying to minimize use of any than "standard" function (function from wow lua api) because my bot (it is not bot actually but rather "helper" ) is in-proc based... and from Unknown's info it looks like CMT function will server better for me.

thanks

p.s. i would rather utilize existing functionality than produce new one... i am so lazy

[Shynd]

well, i am trying to minimize use of any than "standard" function (function from wow lua api) because my bot (it is not bot actually but rather "helper" ) is in-proc based... and from Unknown's info it looks like CMT function will server better for me.

thanks

p.s. i would rather utilize existing functionality than produce new one... i am so lazy

So what you're really saying is you don't have any ****ing clue what you're talking about. Gotcha.

[Cypher]

So what you're really saying is you don't have any ****ing clue what you're talking about. Gotcha.

Pretty much what I gleaned from his post.

[ostapus]

So what you're really saying is you don't have any ****ing clue what you're talking about. Gotcha.

as far as it work for me - fine w/ me.