LAZYBOT support thread, Q&A, requests and updates menu

User Tag List

Page 62 of 292 FirstFirst ... 12585960616263646566112162 ... LastLast
Results 916 to 930 of 4379
  1. #916
    jumperu's Avatar Contributor
    CoreCoins Purchaser
    Reputation
    322
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,412
    Thanks G/R
    5/45
    Trade Feedback
    7 (100%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ty, i updated the first post to reflect this
    :gusta:wow:gusta:

    LAZYBOT support thread, Q&A, requests and updates
  2. #917
    tylen's Avatar Active Member
    Reputation
    21
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    210
    Thanks G/R
    17/14
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by lazyang View Post
    ..you would also take your mother the last shirt, hm? ;D
    its not like that, absolutely different point :\
    all i want is to have a possibility to start editing offsets in last working bot version
    but i hear only "get the original source and work on it... ah! you're not a programming guy? so forget it and wait untill ppl give you compiled version" like ppl who arent that good at programming cant use visual studio
    also im sick of that ppl think like "you're gonna try editing offsets, but its not gonna work. and you will give MY code away to smbd who will jump around and yell thats him who worked on the code that good"

  3. #918
    lazyang's Avatar Sergeant Major
    Reputation
    8
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    141
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by tylen View Post
    its not like that, absolutely different point :\
    all i want is to have a possibility to start editing offsets in last working bot version
    but i hear only "get the original source and work on it... ah! you're not a programming guy? so forget it and wait untill ppl give you compiled version" like ppl who arent that good at programming cant use visual studio
    also im sick of that ppl think like "you're gonna try editing offsets, but its not gonna work. and you will give MY code away to smbd who will jump around and yell thats him who worked on the code that good"
    maybe you should learn to esteem other ppl's work. ..be happy that they share the result with you!
    Last edited by lazyang; 09-13-2012 at 06:39 AM.

  4. #919
    tylen's Avatar Active Member
    Reputation
    21
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    210
    Thanks G/R
    17/14
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by lazyang View Post
    maybe you should learn to esteem other ppl's work. ..be happy that they share the result with you!
    nothing changes... bla bla bla....
    you just cant get the point of difference between working on offsets when new game patch \ build comes and waiting till you can get ready working bot!

  5. #920
    jumperu's Avatar Contributor
    CoreCoins Purchaser
    Reputation
    322
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,412
    Thanks G/R
    5/45
    Trade Feedback
    7 (100%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    well, we only have romb0t that is working on a version for the new patch, as far as i know..(there was genecyber also but i haven't heard from him in a while)
    as for the sharing of his source, since this is a public bot, it is up to him if he want's to share his hard work, no1 can force him to do that

    But to answer your question directly, it was easy to modify the original arutha's source, change the offsets each new patch and have a working bot, that's what i did, no other changes and i didn't need any major knowledge or skillz to do it. However, with this new major patch, we can't do that anymore. Since alot has changed, including most of the spells, we need someone with programming skills to dig deeper into the code and modify what is needed for the bot to function properly. I assure you it is not an easy task.

    Patience is the key word here, as i said in the first post, don't rush into things, the eula has changed also to allow blizz to scan outside of wow process, so i urge all of you to be carefull.
    It is not worth losing an account or more just for a few days or weeks of botting.
    :gusta:wow:gusta:

  6. #921
    nagymajom's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    2
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    57
    Thanks G/R
    0/1
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    gpl licese mean u MUST publish the modified source or do not use!

  7. #922
    nagymajom's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    2
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    57
    Thanks G/R
    0/1
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    //it is up to him if he want's to share his hard work, no1 can force him to do that

    the gpl licese is. if he write own bot from nothing he can chose the license of bot. but he "just" modify an exiting gpl licensed bot. Arutha made it open source, its the minimum keep it gpl to respect Arutha's work.

  8. #923
    tylen's Avatar Active Member
    Reputation
    21
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    210
    Thanks G/R
    17/14
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    before this became offensive,

    i do respect hard work that ppl do updating bots
    and i didnt mean more than i said before about sharing modified source

  9. #924
    lazyang's Avatar Sergeant Major
    Reputation
    8
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    141
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    nagy, i don't know if i really got, what u mean, cause i'm not native engl.
    arutha didn't share the code while he was working with it, either.
    as i know, he made it open source when he got trouble with blizz. and it's still in that way, everybody can download and do what he want with.
    the maincode was from him so nobody could make money with it, or sell even as modified version, except maybe donors for his work with the updates.
    but nobody can be forced to share his own work, even when the maincode wasn't from him.


    maybe somebody could add a kind of warden alert, like other bots have, which notes when W starts to scan your sys and shut down lb or the whole pc.
    Last edited by lazyang; 09-13-2012 at 10:35 AM.

  10. #925
    marina_v1's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    34
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by jumperu View Post
    the eula has changed also to allow blizz to scan outside of wow process, so i urge all of you to be carefull.
    It is not worth losing an account or more just for a few days or weeks of botting.
    can you kindly link or paste that part of eula here? i wanted to read the exact wording, but cant find it

  11. #926
    Jaladhjin's Avatar Contributor Authenticator enabled
    Reputation
    286
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,151
    Thanks G/R
    246/139
    Trade Feedback
    16 (100%)
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    yeah that'd be a pretty ground breaking annoucement..almost as invasive as the screenshots..

  12. #927
    imunreal's Avatar Private
    Reputation
    1
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    14
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    1 (100%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by marina_v1 View Post
    can you kindly link or paste that part of eula here? i wanted to read the exact wording, but cant find it
    https://eu.battle.net/account/legal/anticheating.html

  13. #928
    jumperu's Avatar Contributor
    CoreCoins Purchaser
    Reputation
    322
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,412
    Thanks G/R
    5/45
    Trade Feedback
    7 (100%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This "anti cheating" utility performs limited scans of:
    (iii) the Windows Process List to determine if any confirmed hacking or cheating programs are presently open in violation of the World of Warcraft Terms of Use.
    facepalm
    :gusta:wow:gusta:

  14. #929
    marina_v1's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    34
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ty imunreal!

    and holly cow!

    (ii) the World of Warcraft 'process' to determine if any unauthorized third party programs or
    computer code has been attached to the World of Warcraft process; and

    (iii) the Windows Process List to determine if any confirmed hacking or cheating programs are
    presently open in violation of the World of Warcraft Terms of Use.
    ii) is exactly what LB is doing, attaching to wow process, and by iii) LB is now easily identifiable in win process list.

    I might be wrong, but this makes any use of LB a clear and quick path to a ban. I hope developers can find a way around it somehow...

  15. #930
    jeremie_bs's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    1
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    63
    Thanks G/R
    4/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by marina_v1 View Post
    ty imunreal!

    and holly cow!



    ii) is exactly what LB is doing, attaching to wow process, and by iii) LB is now easily identifiable in win process list.

    I might be wrong, but this makes any use of LB a clear and quick path to a ban. I hope developers can find a way around it somehow...
    What about using reshacker to change process infos?

Similar Threads

  1. [TripZ•ne's Request Thread] Program Requests and Suggestions.
    By TripZ•ne in forum WoW Bots Questions & Requests
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 06-02-2010, 03:56 AM
  2. [Release] [TripZ•ne's Request Thread] Program Requests and Suggestions.
    By TripZ•ne in forum World of Warcraft Bots and Programs
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-29-2010, 04:03 PM
  3. Easy Request and needed ASAP!
    By kalish in forum WoW ME Questions and Requests
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-22-2006, 12:32 AM
  4. A request and 2 questions
    By Osmose in forum WoW ME Questions and Requests
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-14-2006, 12:10 PM
  5. Request and exchange
    By Spown in forum WoW ME Questions and Requests
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-12-2006, 11:15 AM
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 AM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3
Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Google Authenticator verification provided by Two-Factor Authentication (Free) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Digital Point modules: Sphinx-based search