Why would you use displacer beast as resto instead of feline swiftness?
Sent from my Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk 2
Because it offer much more utility than just running around faster.
For example, on Durumu Heroic. The ice walls. If you accidently get caught on the wrong side, Bam, Displacer beast onto the right side. Lots of other situations where its saved my ass more than a small move speed increase would have.
I personally use Displacer for BG's and Arenas xD and i just keep it in my PvE because I'm so used to how it works
if i don't arena or BG for a period of time... i put it on Feline just for the ease of it all
Idiom, i'll give your exact setup a try and see if it breaks or not
Just out of curiosity, what is this "taint" you guys are talking about?
I've implemented Rubim's code for spell queueing on every profile I make, and it's never given me any issues, but I did notice escalating memory usage from PQI so I always suspected there was something odd there, even though it works fine in game.
taint means... when a secure code becomes insecure... in order for PQR to work properly, it needs to remain in a secure state.... if you take data from an insecure place (ie a variable that is insecure) and then use it in a secure environment, the secure environment becomes insecure, and the codes that require a secure environment to work (like spell casts) will now cause an error saying x addon is trying to call protected stuff.....
the reason i made my spell queueing system is.... A.) i wanted a frame (and that NEVER becomes tainted) B.) I wanted there to be checks in place for faulty spellid's and to be allowed to use spell names as well C.) i had a lot of this coded already, and dont like half done code laying around... so i changed the original purpose of the code to this
the taint can come randomly from the SlashCMDList from wow itself... i can't figure out why it becomes tainted... but as some point (it seems random) it does
best i can say is that the taint is erratic and strange in that the profiles that use rubims /rcast spell queu sometimes work as intended and then fo some people and for no reason start spilling errors saying that every addon is trying to use a blizz ui only action and is therefore blocked= tainted-so far bu_ba new spell queu has been taintfree for me even under heavy raiding use. In theory the only thing that SHOULD be tainting tht UI is trying to manipulate a variable from an insecured place like a macro so rubims /rcast and bu_ba /novaspell shgould in theory not be problamatic
bu_ba_911 in your code you get a first run out of the way
wondering if that declaration is making it taint freeCode:if not Setup then Nova_Queue_Setup() RunMacroText("/novaspell") -- The first time run, it always returns insecure, so getting that first run out of the way Setup = true end
I can't figure it out... but the very first run is always tainted... then it's secure again... So I make sure nothing is passed on the first run so it can't taint the cast of a real check..
But it still taints at some point lol... a mystery
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 4
Well me and CT have some plans for 5.4....
so just a heads up...
i am no longer supporting about 50% of the old data file and have removed it.... so the data file will need to be updated.... there will also be a couple other changes for 5.4 as well, but i will go more into those when we release the first 5.4 profile of the patch
big fun stuff is big fun stuff ^_^
Looking forward to that! Patch hits US today right? We're gonna go flex tomorrow to try the new raid out before our normal-run on thursday ^^