[Source] eBot

[LegacyAX]

Has anyone noticed that the demo timer never returns 1 xD (demo never runs out...) So if anyone has RC4-7 the demo is everlasting.... Free bot, Was a big mistake to do that lol, there eBot dev's released their own 'cracked' version

if ya dont believe me then download RC4-RC7 and run the demo on a trial it will surpass 9 mins ..... that is until your char. dies from the bot not targeting the mob ... >.>

[Robske]

I honestly think there should be as many options as possible when it comes to bots. The more options, the more work Blizzard would have to put in to try and detect those bots. This also means that a minimal number of people would be banned due to a detection ban-wave.

But thats all just my personal opinion.

Harko already outlined one of the main reasons people aren't keen to releasing stuff here (atleast, that's my impression)

There are enough people here who could write/release "acceptable" bots, no doubt about that - You can basically make one in notepad using copypasta from the Memory Editing section - Alot of those bots would also be based on a handful of core functions (such as DoString, Interact and ClickTerrain) As Harko said, a simple address check and *poof* - alot of people like me who don't have the indepth knowledge of circumventing this check would be pulverised by Blizzard's thrusting manhood. (not if it's like their silly lua-protection check ofc )

I - and probably others - would rather keep their bot private then to recieve some stupid reputation points here for a few patches only to **** over themselves and others in the end when Blizzard finally does something about thier code rather then to attack our software.

Moral of the story: It sucks if you can't keep up with the cat-and-mice game

Rant out

[Sazxo]

Woot no ?! Testing now rofl

EDIT: ehmm my botting exp was running tareting killing , everthing was fine , but I get Dc every 2nd minute

[JoeBiden]

Seems pretty amateurish of him, using blackmagic, and having offsets hard-coded I haven't look at any of the code (just looked over the files and names) it's probably way too complicated for me anyway. But if you want to make money from a bot you should put in way more work than this.

[L e o]

kynox you are the BEST!+Rep

*gets out bestest skills!*

[dskle]

Long time lurker, first time poster. I know you guys expect a lot of responsibility when posting on the forums, so I just wanted to say that I appreciate this release. Not because I want to compile and use it, but because I should be able to glean some information that'll point me in the right directions. I'm in the process of learning assembly, C#, and windows API to understand how bots work.

I had a feeling this bot had taken work from people on this board, but I was like "no, that would be really dick, the guys on the mmowed must be working on it together". I'm a novice programmer, and even I shake my fist at VB.

[Robske]

Long time lurker, first time poster. I know you guys expect a lot of responsibility when posting on the forums, so I just wanted to say that I appreciate this release. Not because I want to compile and use it, but because I should be able to glean some information that'll point me in the right directions. I'm in the process of learning assembly, C#, and windows API to understand how bots work.

I had a feeling this bot had taken work from people on this board, but I was like "no, that would be really dick, the guys on the mmowed must be working on it together". I'm a novice programmer, and even I shake my fist at VB.

It's a good example on how not to do it, really

[dskle]

Heh, ya I suppose you're right. But even with its faults, I see things that confirm I'm on the right track, and others that show me where I could be going (even though the implementation seems poor).

[korknob]

So, how long before we see eBot clones for sale? lawl

[bugmebug]

c# and vb.net all converts to same machine language by the compiler at the end. whole .net library is same for both of them. right now almost only the syntax is different between two. But if you dont know what you are saying you can give chilldish responses like what vb what a noob @$3£# .

If you want to be a good programmer first read a bit ..

Old dinasours sees vb on it and thinks it is visual basic. its a fully object oriented language ffs!!

Vb.net is not vb and C# is not C ..

[BoogieManTM]

c# and vb.net all converts to same machine language by the compiler at the end. whole .net library is same for both of them. right now almost only the syntax is different between two. But if you dont know what you are saying you can give chilldish responses like what vb what a noob @$3£# .

If you want to be a good programmer first read a bit ..

Old dinasours sees vb on it and thinks it is visual basic. its a fully object oriented language ffs!!

Vb.net is not vb and C# is not C ..

The syntax for vb.NET is still ugly (as kynox said). it's the "tonka toys" of programming languages.. Nobody said it was incapable of doing the job.

[bugmebug]

I'm a novice programmer, and even I shake my fist at VB.

i was talking about this logic.

[dskle]

i was talking about this logic.

Yes, and I was referring to syntactically as well. If you need to explain that C# is not C then you've obviously misjudged.

</threadjack>

[MasterGold]

That people actually pay for this that code is like scrambled eggs.

Still thanks kynox

[NyteRyder]

That people actually pay for this that code is like scrambled eggs.

Still thanks kynox

It looks worse than my code... And I'm paid for it