128 gb ram on 32 bit systems menu

User Tag List

Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Thelovefool's Avatar Banned
    Reputation
    198
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    273
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    128 gb ram on 32 bit systems

    Hello together,
    i found a little solution how you can use up to 128 gb ram on windows 32 bit which i wanna show you here:

    What you need:
    1. A Hex-Editor Freeware Hex Editor XVI32
    2. Windows WDK Windows Software Development Kit

    Ok lets start

    1. Download and install all needed Programs.

    2. Open "C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32" and copy "NTKRNLPA.EXE" to your desktop and rename it to "ntkr128g.exe"

    3. Open the Hex-Editor and open the copied "ntkr128g.exe".

    4. Search for this byteorder:
    Code:
    7C XX 8B 45 FC 85 C0 74 YY
    XX and YY are placeholder which are different from system to system. You should find this string exactly 2 times.

    5. Now change this string starting from 8B to
    Code:
    B8 00 00 02 00 90 90
    7C XX have to remain how they are (DONT CHANGE THEM)

    6. Check if there are no errors, save the file and Copy it to "C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32".

    7. Since the Kernel file is changed its no more digital signed and windows wont start it. We have to do the following to make it work again.

    8. Now we create a startmenu entry to change between the modified 128 gb kernel and the normal kernel.

    9. Open up CMD and type in the following lines one by one:
    Code:
    dir C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32
    Code:
    C:\Winddk\7600.16385.0\bin\x86\makecert -r -ss my -n "CN=Meine Name"
    Code:
    C:\Winddk\7600.16385.0\bin\x86\signtool sign -s my -n "Meine Name" ntkr128g.exe

    10. Open up cmd again and type in the following:
    Code:
    bcdedit /copy {current} /d "Windows 7 128GB"
    11. You will get a long number (GUID) which you have to copy.

    12. Now we have to type in these commands one by one into cmd:
    Code:
    bcdedit /set {your GUID number here!} pae ForceEnable
    bcdedit /set {your GUID number here!} kernel ntkr128g.exe
    bcdedit /set {your GUID number here!} testsigning on
    13. If cmd confirm everything you have to restart your computer and select the 128 gb kernel in the start menu.



    I hope i could help a few of you.

    This is written by: Imperial Blaze, Thelovefool

    128 gb ram on 32 bit systems
  2. #2
    2dgreengiant's Avatar ★ Elder ★


    Reputation
    1192
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    7,129
    Thanks G/R
    1/3
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Cypher plx save us
    If you need me you have my skype, if you don't have my skype then you don't need me.

  3. #3
    Remus's Avatar Banned

    Reputation
    402
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,697
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    pff APOC SAVE US!!- teach this soul that this has been around for a bit and 128 mb of ram iss fkn useless for anyone running 32 bit, without the sense to buy 64 bit .

    a PAE switch afaik has been around since NT ???????? correct me cypher- i just know for sure it has been awhile, and it aint anything "new"


    The /3GB switch can cause some applications to have problems that are related to address dependencies as well or to a reduction in kernel space.

    Bottom line: if you have 4GB of RAM in your system (or more), and you want to take full advantage of it, start using a 64-bit OS.
    Last edited by Remus; 12-06-2009 at 10:14 AM.

  4. #4
    Apoc's Avatar Angry Penguin
    Reputation
    1388
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    2,750
    Thanks G/R
    0/13
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just because you can change what it SAYS you have available; doesn't change what it can actually use. It's an architectural limit. Not something you can change by editing a few bytes.

  5. #5
    Nikentic's Avatar Elite User
    Reputation
    453
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,556
    Thanks G/R
    10/4
    Trade Feedback
    6 (100%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Kinda fail... heh

  6. #6
    The Saint's Avatar Master Sergeant
    Reputation
    29
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    131
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Like Apoc said. It may read that, however, it will never be that. No computer, with the exception of super computers, can hold *** ram.
    ~Web Engineer and Server Administrator

  7. #7
    LucasGod's Avatar Active Member
    Reputation
    35
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    462
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Oh, Running over 9000 WoW's would be fun, with that ammount of RAM, though.

  8. #8
    Nikentic's Avatar Elite User
    Reputation
    453
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,556
    Thanks G/R
    10/4
    Trade Feedback
    6 (100%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This is so fail. Even with a computer that can handle that, you probably don't run wow good on it.

  9. #9
    mmhelm's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    25
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    147
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    >Implying it takes a supercomputer to hold 128GBs of ram.

  10. #10
    Nikentic's Avatar Elite User
    Reputation
    453
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,556
    Thanks G/R
    10/4
    Trade Feedback
    6 (100%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It just demand a hell of a motherboard or 4.

  11. #11
    LucasGod's Avatar Active Member
    Reputation
    35
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    462
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Even if that was possible for "normal people", it wouldn't be that useful, you would just waste most of the RAM.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-02-2013, 02:55 PM
  2. [MaNGOS&ArcEmu] Compiling on 64 bit systems
    By Sorayazlawl in forum WoW EMU Questions & Requests
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-02-2010, 07:20 PM
  3. Question: 4GB Limit on a 32-Bit System
    By allesist in forum Community Chat
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 10-11-2008, 08:09 PM
  4. how to run glider if you are on a 64 bit system.
    By foulwind in forum World of Warcraft Guides
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-14-2008, 04:17 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-24-2006, 01:43 AM
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 PM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3
Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Google Authenticator verification provided by Two-Factor Authentication (Free) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Digital Point modules: Sphinx-based search