[Warning] Anti-cheat implemented, stop using any hack/bot (Proof inside)

[Sikas]

Could GGG update their Anti-Cheat on their end without us ever knowing? If that's the case, we always have to be checking. Unless like OP said, someone created a bypass with tripwire built in.

[HvC]

Could GGG update their Anti-Cheat on their end without us ever knowing? If that's the case, we always have to be checking. Unless like OP said, someone created a bypass with tripwire built in.

The search methods are currently built into the local executable but they can always check for specific behaviours on the server side.

[Sikas]

Behaviours from the hacks? Or if certain memory is being read? Or is it within game our interaction with the world?

Hopefully the anti-cheat stick within the client and not loaded from the server.

[enaf3n]

The patterns are currently built into the local executable but they can always check for specific behaviours on the server side.

I'm sure that by patterns, you're referring to the detection methods they use (i.e. process enumeration, signature scan) and not the actual signatures themselves (i.e. the byte pattern used to detect the cheat.) If you did mean the latter, these are sent from the server during run time so they could add them at any time without an update.

[HvC]

I'm sure that by patterns, you're referring to the detection methods they use (i.e. process enumeration, signature scan) and not the actual signatures themselves (i.e. the byte pattern used to detect the cheat.) If you did mean the latter, these are sent from the server during run time so they could add them at any time without an update.

I mean the detection patterns as in the methods they use, granted my wording was confusing I'll go edit that, wha tI meant is that they don't pull new methods and use a jit to add them when they need them.

[enaf3n]

I mean the detection patterns as in the methods they use, granted my wording was confusing I'll go edit that, wha tI meant is that they don't pull new methods and use a jit to add them when they need them.

Right. I assumed that's what you meant.

[Jaerin]

Most people aren't smart enough to not run the hack after they patch the code anyways. So it only really takes once for people to get caught.

The only real way that you can save people is to forcibly prevent them from even running it after a patch. Honestly though if people want to use it that badly they are going to get caught anyways.

[Ouariasse]

did it now whether i release it or not is another story, it'll get patched if i make it public so i'll probably make a private version and keep it closed source.

And now heading for work.

[JediMindTricks]

did it now whether i release it or not is another story, it'll get patched if i make it public so i'll probably make a private version and keep it closed source.

And now heading for work.

welp people used to pay $ for non bannable maphacks in diablo 2 lol

might happen w/ poe

[histachii]

poe hud is worth the $$

[Ouariasse]

This is just a bypass that makes any hack undetected

[PathOfBots]

Don't ever release bypass. It's way more profitable for bots if the average leecher can't farm on his own.

Also I gotta finish RMTing all my currency while prices are still high.

[Ouariasse]

lol isn't that selfish.

[moepion]

poe hud is worth the $$

i agree. personally i would pay $$ for it.

[Laddergoat]

lol isn't that selfish.

It's always nice to see someone upholding moral values