Hi Chuichu,
I know you are very busy these days but it would be great if the Red gem bug can be fixed. My bot periodically bought junk items with red gem in them for 2b
. The log showed that HA thinks that the item's real dps is same as dps when red gem is inserted.
Best,
ill put out a release to include red gem fix soon as i complete the search/equipment of the software rework which i just started. since my work is lax this week (since others are under pressure teehee) it should be in a few days.
this will include a new API including more manual control of the search list as requested in the previous page. this will not break the old API/scripts but it will be deprecated
Last edited by ChuiChu; 06-18-2013 at 03:41 AM.
Does this mean that there will be new functions implemented in the code and we will have to rewrite the scripts for the new system?![]()
Anyways, the promise that it will be faster sounds more than amazing, can't wait for it!!!
will i need a level 60 to view ilevel 58-63 items? or does this bot bypass that?
(since level 1 characters can't view level 60 items)
zero bans? i read like 30-40 pages of this thread.
Last edited by nemesis3; 06-18-2013 at 07:54 AM.
Guys, if i have more than 1 client, are there a way to have 1 console for each client instead of 1 console that group all the output?
Thanks Orbiter87,
I actually include a small code to disregard the item with ruby in its socket too. But in my experience, in the case of this bug, HA itself thinks that there is no ruby in the socket, hence the wrong real dps calculation. And since HA itself thinks there is no ruby in the socket, my ruby check does not have any effect.
But I might code wrongly somewhere.
hey guys quick poll:
do you still find the state restore upon relogin useful? i had several requests asking to just start the script over again (a feature added a few versions ago)
i figure with that bnet change to not boot you on input limit so easily its no longer that important. and its a big mess of somewhat unstable code id like to remove![]()
Can you get banned for using this?
Hi Friend, i use that function alot and i hope you don't remove it, but if you decide to remove it, i'll find another way.
My 2 cents
Yes, and about this matter i was about to report that i'm been contacted by a gm, 4 clients received a tell, almost at the same time, asking me if i was there, i answered yes on 1 client and stopped the other, chit chatted with this man for few mins and he pretended to be a GM and he told they are making some check.
First time ever this uppened to me, usually they BAN! nothing else.
I don't really think that this function is critical in any way, since setlogin does it's job properly.![]()
Last edited by Sehae; 06-21-2013 at 10:17 AM.