Superior/Epic Achievements

[Gihelle]

Not an exploit.

[snowscar]

this definitely works, tried it with the rings

[skurwiec]

Lol, that's pretty obvious and anyone with IQ higher than wooden chair can figure it out by himself...

[seagull]

I'm nobody who shouts this on a regular basis, but this is common sense.

This was the first thing I tried to do when I got my 213 trinket.

Other people are starving for rep and the people actually getting it are reposters or leechers with some common sense stuff. What the hell is wrong here...

[kibantik]

Thanks anyway for the tip.

[Greed]

Its a repost gimme a second
http://www.mmowned.com/forums/wow-ex...rior-epic.html
There we go

Thank you, and i have reported this thread.

[darkorin]

This is working as intended, it is common sense, and it is a repost.

[LiquidShizzles]

And yet again a reposter got repped.. I went trough all the trouble of finding a real nice and fresh exploit. I get 3 rep... and a freaking reposter like you gets one for something which was posted here 3 weeks ago and then already was kinda common sense..

LOL

(filling teh space)

[Mudkips]

I did a quick search for 'epic' 'epic achievement' 'superior achievement' and didn't find anything related.

A quick way to speed up your Epic or Superior achievements is to acquire, be it with badges, honor, or an actual raid, one trinket and one ring with corresponding iLvls (186 for Superior and 213 for Epic if I'm not mistaken), equip the items in trinket slot 1 and ring slot 1. Then swap each into the second slot and check your achievements page. You should now have credit for having both rings and both trinkets.

This works for both Epic and Superior, and as a tip (common sense): You can skip Superior and go straight to Epic to get credit for Superior at the same time.

Post if this helps you!

Definately a repost, but still. Grats for finding it again!

[apoptygmax]

Pffft that's common sense... Why wouldn't it work like that... I think I worked that out the second I saw those achievements. Sorry, Don't think this belongs in exploits