Info About Mike Crowe and the WOTLK repacks

[Greeko]

You don't know what the hell you are talking about. I didn't mean the SANDBOX thread. I was talking about the SERVER thread and it had 60k views before it got removed.

Wait lol, who cares if it got 60k views? It was still against the rules, wasnt it? It doesnt matter how much views it had or how much posts it had..

[Remus]

look what i found http://www.mmowned.com/forums/wow-em...lowed-yet.html GASP SAYS NO WOTLK SERVERS FOR POSTING ; as you said to me;

" I was talking about the SERVER thread and it had 60k views before it got removed." gee i wonder why they keep getting removed.

o and in support of GP. that statement means WE ARE NOT A SUPPORT THREAD FOR MANGOS. GO TO THEIR PAGE NOT OURS. simple enough yet? sure there is a DISCUSSION area.. but not a QQ omg wotlk for mangos isnt working. wahhh. until such a time it is allowed QUIT YOUR CRYING AND MOVE ON.
flame me idc.

[Quty]

/disagree

So why have an emulator section if you're just going to point us to another forum to find help?
Granted there were a lot of WotLK threads, but at least Mike tried to help out the community by giving us updates to his "repack" and helping us out when we had problems getting it online.

[Quty]

look what i found http://www.mmowned.com/forums/wow-em...lowed-yet.html GASP SAYS NO WOTLK SERVERS FOR POSTING ; as you said to me;

"

that was posted 1 day ago....

[Remus]

does it matter? MODERATORS RULES ARE TO BE FOLLOWED. they are the peace keepers and police force inplace of the admins who are doing what ever it is they do. even i was sick and tired of seeing all the same bs wotlk threads that had little variation. and as the stickied topic NONETHELESS enacted by a RESPECTABLE moderator it doesnt matter what you all say. the rule is in effect if you want wotlk go elsewhere the Mods said no.

if mike wanted to help he should have gone about it another way.(the mangos forums?) again the rule is in effect so stop the QQ.

[Greeko]

/disagree

So why have an emulator section if you're just going to point us to another forum to find help?
Granted there were a lot of WotLK threads, but at least Mike tried to help out the community by giving us updates to his "repack" and helping us out when we had problems getting it online.

C'mon don't be so stupid. He didn't say that you should go to another forum to find help? He just told us that this forum has members that can more Ascent than MaNGOS.

[Dythzer]

Wait lol, who cares if it got 60k views? It was still against the rules, wasnt it? It doesnt matter how much views it had or how much posts it had..

What exactly was against the rules? There was no rules saying WotLK threads aren't allowed here.

look what i found http://www.mmowned.com/forums/wow-em...lowed-yet.html GASP SAYS NO WOTLK SERVERS FOR POSTING ; as you said to me;

" I was talking about the SERVER thread and it had 60k views before it got removed." gee i wonder why they keep getting removed.

o and in support of GP. that statement means WE ARE NOT A SUPPORT THREAD FOR MANGOS. GO TO THEIR PAGE NOT OURS. simple enough yet? sure there is a DISCUSSION area.. but not a QQ omg wotlk for mangos isnt working. wahhh. until such a time it is allowed QUIT YOUR CRYING AND MOVE ON.
flame me idc.

That thread was made AFTER I made my thread because too much people was advertising their servers there and I'm NOT the one who are QQ:ing here, I didn't create this thread. I'm just continuing the discussion.

I think you guys have missunderstood the whole point of the WotLK server. It wasn't made to make you mad. If you think so, you are taking this whole shit tooo seriously.

[Greeko]

What exactly was against the rules? There was no rules saying WotLK threads aren't allowed here.



That thread was made AFTER I made my thread because too much people was advertising their servers there and I'm NOT the one who are QQ:ing here, I didn't create this thread. I'm just continuing the discussion.

I think you guys have missunderstood the whole point of the WotLK server. It wasn't made to get you mad. If you think so, you are taking this whole shit tooo seriously.

Ehm, you should know.. You started the thread
: Advertesing was one reason, i remember.

[2dgreengiant]

16] Threads containing questions about the creation or running of a World of the Lich King servers will be deleted.

L2read
(fillers)

[Remus]

im not stating your Qqing im talking of the other posters here that are /disagee . i have nothing against you as i dont know you that well yet. but imo we dont need a wotlk server up yet as there are so many things wrong with it. it was nice for a short time. that is it.

[Quty]

People were advertising their own servers in Mike's thread because people weren't able to get their WotLK servers up and running. So they advertised in the thread for ppl to check it out. Wasn't the right forum, but a reminder would've helped instead of just closing the thread.

[Remus]

... yeah thats called spam.

[Dythzer]

I still didn't get an answer for this question:

And if you don't want any WotLK threads, why aren't you removing SectorSeven's thread too?

And now when you say it's against the rules. (which I'm sure it wasn't before I made my thread)

[Greeko]

People were advertising their own servers in Mike's thread because people weren't able to get their WotLK servers up and running. So they advertised in the thread for ppl to check it out. Wasn't the right forum, but a reminder would've helped instead of just closing the thread.

Yeah so? Its against the rules..

[Zilver]

Thinking of the reason Mike's thread where removed/closed I think you guys should be thinking of removing/closing:
"SectorSeven's WotLK Alpha OpenAscent Repack"

(well due to all my post being deleted with Mike's thread, i now seem to be unable to post link's, nice...)

This thread also seem to be taking the wotlk road, which as i understand it you guys don't approve off.

This is no personal vendetta, but not letting one post and letting another post, that is not a very cool and friendly approach.

Just my 5 cent's.