CTM again

[flo8464]

mmm, i see.. so, if we have

global struct
{
a, b
} mystruct ;

in binary that will be
mov eax, <absolute address> [a]
mov eax, <absolute address> [b]

is that correct ? not something like
mov edx, <absolute address> mystruct
mov eax, [edx+4] // as a
mov edx, [esdx+8] // as b

? lazy to check it myself )

The second. Maybe I am completly wrong but I think it should result in smaller code.

mov eax, <absolute address>

takes 5 Byte on 32bit systems.

mov eax, [edx+4]

should be smaller.
So every compiler picks it in the process of optimizing.