i am sorry, but i cannot help myself from laughing now. you are unwilling to admit you are wrong, so you resort to pointing out your own accomplishments while belittling me for having none. you have failed yourself, you have failed logic, and you have failed this thread.
go back and re-read the thread, you fail so much its depressing to see. here is a basic synopsis of your failure
you claim division by zero to be an impossibility (which has very little relation to my original post anyhow)
i divide by zero but reach the wrong conclusion and point out i still did it.
you tell me i'm wrong because i forgot a space (lol) as well as stating that it doesn't have an infinite answer
i explain how possibilities work (because apparently, you don't grasp the concept) and... also infinity (cuz you don't get that either)
you babble on about random code which has NO relation to the basic idea of what i was trying to say (straws!!!!) you then say it is undefined (what is infinity, if not a number which can never be defined? you basically proved me right FOR me lol)
once again i try to explain why your wrong in basic terms (although you still don't seem to grasp the very basic concepts.) explaining my views
you tell me your lost, and then proceed to explain how your in school (once again steering the conversation towards a place where you must feel more comfortable with)
i once again (in the simplest way imaginable) explain the very basic concepts of division (so much for school eh?) as well as kindly informing you of errors you have previously made.
you tell me how you've been helpful to others and a wonderful member of the communty (lawl, yeah. nice argument there)
sorry, but once again. you fail to grasp very basic concepts, an exception is in itself, a precaution against a probability that might or might not occur and is WHY i used programming as an analogy. people use exceptions to handle things that weren't intended for the original concept.
translated back into the original point, your "you can't divide by zero" impossibility was disproven because, while it is not meant to be done wrong, there is no exception that prevents this. check mate. you lose.
talk about dodging original points? what was yours again? to divide by zero? i did. you lose again. i am not the one who dragged this conversation onto the theories of zero but i am sure that i am not wrong on this.
your analogy about the math teacher is nice, but irrelevent. if my math teacher said "do this test and you get a 100" then all that i need to do, is do. however if my teacher simply said "do this test" then i can be sure i will not pass if i get it wrong you do not get the concept or correctly emphasizing the point so that both your meaning and what is required to be "right" are met.
once again moving this analogy back into the original reason for this argument, you only said doing it was impossible, not in solving it.
i never questioned your ability to program, nor even your ability to come up with wordy solutions for relatively simple problems. however since you bring it up this suggests you yourself are implying your own lack of skill which i find quite humorous.
as for my lack of work, here is my theory on lolhax.
step 1. copy pasta
step 2. cheat engine
step 3. google writeprocessmemory
step 4. ???
step 5. run around as if i know everything
p.s. re-read the concepts of infinity.