PQR - Rotation Bot

[solarwake]

she also has a small baby who is about to turn 1 so I am sure her hands are full .....

speaking of babies.... mine is due anytime now... my wife has started dialiating and is afaced time for my 3rd kid to come into this world

Wow Grats dude! Hope all goes well!

[imdasandman]

Wow Grats dude! Hope all goes well!

yea but knowing this baby she will make us wait another week lol

[bu_ba_911]

yea but knowing this baby she will make us wait another week lol

Lol grats man :-) hope all goes well :-D

Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2

[diesall]

I managed to have a quick look at novas profile config frame, i like the idea, so i will update PQInterface within the next week with a similar interface configurable from the addon that will save proifle settings across sessions and be very easy for profile authors to include, i will add documentation to the Wiki when finished.

[deadpanstiffy]

I managed to have a quick look at novas profile config frame, i like the idea, so i will update PQInterface within the next week with a similar interface configurable from the addon that will save proifle settings across sessions and be very easy for profile authors to include, i will add documentation to the Wiki when finished.

This will be great, PQI has always been a great addition to PQR.

[veany]

where i can get offsets for ptr?

[diesall]

fyi seems using PQR_RotationStarted to load scripts is bad practice as it does not trigger on manual casting modes, meaning if you use the manual casting feature you'll have to run each script on auto first before they will function manually, to not confuse users use your own global variable for initializing scripts.

[bu_ba_911]

I managed to have a quick look at novas profile config frame, i like the idea, so i will update PQInterface within the next week with a similar interface configurable from the addon that will save proifle settings across sessions and be very easy for profile authors to include, i will add documentation to the Wiki when finished.

i like it!

i thought about making an addon, but i decided to go pure lua in the end. can't wait to see what u come up with

[cassrgs]

I managed to have a quick look at novas profile config frame, i like the idea, so i will update PQInterface within the next week with a similar interface configurable from the addon that will save proifle settings across sessions and be very easy for profile authors to include, i will add documentation to the Wiki when finished.

Hello there, i love PQInterface and cant live whitout. but there is some spells that dont appear on the log on several profiles, What could it be?

[diesall]

Hello there, i love PQInterface and cant live without. but there is some spells that don't appear on the log on several profiles, What could it be?

There spells for one reason or another your particular profile author has decided to hard code instead of using pqr's ability editors SpellID attribute to cast the spell.

[cassrgs]

There spells for one reason or another your particular profile author has decided to hard code instead of using pqr's ability editors SpellID attribute to cast the spell.

Yes, but some abilities (as mind flay of frost strike) seems to only work when you use CastSpellByName(GetSpellInfo()). Its there a way to make PQInterface log those abilities?

[diesall]

Yes, but some abilities (as mind flay of frost strike) seems to only work when you use CastSpellByName(GetSpellInfo()). Its there a way to make PQInterface log those abilities?

Not for the time being as im listening to custom created event handlers from PQR for PQI, the only way i can capture those events is for xelper to create a hook function for CastSpellByName or a custom function with a similar name ( but that would require rotation authors to use it ) or perhaps an optional 'Spell Name' Attribute in the ability editor.

[DiabloFan]

This nova frame work and PQI is great and all but I believe time would be more well spent to create actual needed functionality for pqr.

Like auto use of the green targeting circles, and a auto return of how many enemys are within a certain radius of a given unit just for examples.

Profile developers do not develop PQR itself. Both of the features that you mention need to be coded into PQR and have nothing to do with profiles.

[Nerder]

I know that. And its not usual for "profile developers" to write addons such as PQI but they do it

All I'm saying is that time would be better spent learning the inners of pqr itself..I believe its open source and adding a few more necessary pqr_ functions to it.

Might have to get a few new offset but xelper himself said its real easy to do and anyone can do it....

I'm just wondering why people don't spend more time on this aspect of this whole project and why xelper is the only one developing the inners for PQR itself.

I believe we are already all spoiled on the benefits that PQR provides, from my personal use it has made me much lazier on how to play all these other classes that I never once knew how to play, but I love the fact that it's already around. From what you are asking it sounds like you should look into how to provide those functions, if you really believe they should be there then you can research and study on how to implement on what you want. I myself write profiles, but believe that PQR itself is fine. You pretty much want PQR to be a full on bot, which if that is what you want roll with another program. Sorry to go on a rant but really why do you need so much more from it like what you listed?

I apologize for lashing out if thats what it seems like, but am really fed up with the people who don't give kudos on what they already have in front of them... which is an amazing tool and amazing people to provide to the good of the group to be the best in their class.

--Side note though, the part of you mentioning the "better use of green circles" is already being worked on with the release of PQR 3.0

[kuukuu]

I agree with what you've said and I understand and I'm not trying to make arguments here... I was simply trying to make suggestion on how PQR could be expanded

There is no doubt that what has already been done is good and a lot of work went into it..

All I'm saying is I feel like if this work went into pqr itself, it would make for a better outcome on the project as a whole.

PQR also isn't open source as far as I know, hence why the only one developing it is Xelper.