[Release] LuaHobo - Run protected LUA menu

User Tag List

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 51
  1. #16
    Sikas's Avatar Active Member
    Reputation
    69
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    386
    Thanks G/R
    6/2
    Trade Feedback
    1 (100%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I won't be using this, though good job on trying to replicate Cypher's LuaNinja. I got banned and not stupid enough to get banned again for using the same method. Unless someone releases a way for their to be protection... no thanks.

    [Release] LuaHobo - Run protected LUA
  2. #17
    Apoc's Avatar Angry Penguin
    Reputation
    1388
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    2,750
    Thanks G/R
    0/13
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This is more of a replication of LuaFoo, than LuaNinja.

    LuaFoo registered it's own commands to avoid the protection checks entirely.

    LuaNinja completely disabled those checks.

    This does neither, it just calls FrameScript::Execute and hopes for the best.

  3. #18
    Seifer's Avatar Site Donator
    Reputation
    129
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    270
    Thanks G/R
    1/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by Apoc View Post
    This is more of a replication of LuaFoo, than LuaNinja.

    LuaFoo registered it's own commands to avoid the protection checks entirely.

    LuaNinja completely disabled those checks.

    This does neither, it just calls FrameScript::Execute and hopes for the best.
    Correct, but again, doesn't a hobo always hope for the best?

  4. #19
    Xsty's Avatar Active Member
    Reputation
    16
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    66
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by Seifer View Post
    Basically, the WoW Lua engine or API is a set of functions provided by Blizzard to interact with and modify the World of Warcraft interface and behavior through the use of addons and macros.

    However, you can't access all of these functions through console commands, as some of them are protected, I've listed some in the main post, as well as a list to all API functions, including the protected ones.

    You can run "normal", or unprotected Lua functions through the console using "/script", e.g "/script RepopMe();" will transfer you to a spirit resser when you're dead. However, we can't use the protected functions using the "/script" command, for example "/script CastSpellByName("Healing Wave")" won't work.

    What LuaHobo does is allow you to run these functions by calling an Engine function in WoW, externally. So where the "/script CastSpellByName("Healing Wave")" doesn't work in-game, you are able to execute this command through LuaHobo, by providing it with "CastSpellByName("Healing Wave")" (the function name, not the console command!) in the Lua Execution section of the program.

    This way you get around the protection, without interfering.
    Sry if im not getting it, but what's the purpose of getting around the LUA/API protection?

    Why just not use the Healing Wave from the spell book or make a macro with /cast healing wave?

    :confused:

  5. #20
    flo8464's Avatar Active Member
    Reputation
    30
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    434
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    @Robske: Why should he reinvent the wheel?

    Wonder when someone will make a pay-version of this. From my experience paid bots like Honorbuddy/gatherbuddy/pirox or paid hacks like WoWinfinity are the ones that doesn't get detected....fast.... (Since it basically becomes the developers job to keep it secure). I'd like to pay for a secure LuaNinja/hobo/foo whatever, that'll work.. FUREVAAH
    Bots != Hacks.
    Being able to use protected lua is a huge advantage, they know why they fix it asap.
    Hey, it compiles! Ship it!

  6. #21
    snigelmannen's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    27
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    318
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by Xsty View Post
    Sry if im not getting it, but what's the purpose of getting around the LUA/API protection?

    Why just not use the Healing Wave from the spell book or make a macro with /cast healing wave?

    :confused:
    They want to be able to do 1 button faceroll macros for interrupting and dpsing
    " Spy sappin mah sentry! "

  7. #22
    Tierman's Avatar Active Member
    Reputation
    40
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    343
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by Seifer View Post
    Correct, but again, doesn't a hobo always hope for the best?
    I'm not a hobo. When it comes to being banned, I prefer the safe(er) way. Not just pure chance.

    https://change.dossergame.co.uk/change_please/4636419/

  8. #23
    Seifer's Avatar Site Donator
    Reputation
    129
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    270
    Thanks G/R
    1/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by Tierman View Post
    I'm not a hobo. When it comes to being banned, I prefer the safe(er) way. Not just pure chance.
    It's the risk of the trade.

  9. #24
    kynox's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    830
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    888
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Worth mentioning that this has zero protection, and I have already identified multiple ways to detect it using the current Warden. Releasing something like this without protection is just asking to have peoples accounts banned.

  10. #25
    ~OddBall~'s Avatar Contributor
    Reputation
    207
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,156
    Thanks G/R
    4/4
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just an FYI and not bashing your release, your effort into this is recognized and appreciated, but this is the 4th program that enables the use of protected lua commands, the previous 3 all got detected very quickly. Kynox's and Apoc's was a matter of days, Cypher's lasted longer cos he worked really hard on making it undetectable.

    Kynox, Cypher and Apoc are the most recognized programmers on this forum with huge skill, they all attempted to keep their hack from getting detected but were beaten by Warden. Now I don't know how great you are at programming, but you have just released a type of hack that Blizzard has shown they hate (By detecting a similar hack 3 times previous to this) with no protection. Warden dude was more than happy to take on Kynox, Apoc and Cypher, honestly the Warden guy is going to take one look at this, see that it's easier than all three previous versions of this hack to detect and you'll be gone!

    Good luck, but seriously, you've got no hope xP
    https://www.mmowned.com/forums/world-of-warcraft/guides/278302-selecting-bot-you.html - SELECTING THE BOT FOR YOU

    PHWOOOOAAAAAR - Parog was here. <3 <----Wtf's a Parog?

  11. #26
    WannaBeProgrammer's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    156
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by ~OddBall~ View Post
    Just an FYI and not bashing your release, your effort into this is recognized and appreciated, but this is the 4th program that enables the use of protected lua commands, the previous 3 all got detected very quickly. Kynox's and Apoc's was a matter of days, Cypher's lasted longer cos he worked really hard on making it undetected.
    Every thing can be detected nothing is undetecable.

  12. #27
    ~OddBall~'s Avatar Contributor
    Reputation
    207
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,156
    Thanks G/R
    4/4
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I swear people hunt these forums looking for people that say "undetected" just so they can look like some super smart genious and say "LOL NOTHING R DETECTABLE NUB".
    I know nothing is undetectable, I did mean to say undetected, but seriously it has no real relevance to my post at all so go try be smart somewhere else, I'm sure you can find a few spelling errors in a few posts if you want to spend your day searching for them and posting corrections, that will be like taking viagra for your e-peen i'm sure
    https://www.mmowned.com/forums/world-of-warcraft/guides/278302-selecting-bot-you.html - SELECTING THE BOT FOR YOU

    PHWOOOOAAAAAR - Parog was here. <3 <----Wtf's a Parog?

  13. #28
    zys924's Avatar Active Member
    Reputation
    20
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    113
    Thanks G/R
    0/7
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    permanently undetection is impossible.

    it's always a matter of time to ban a public hack if BLZ wants to...

    The only way to use hack for long is to develop a hack in a currently undetectable way on your own and keep it private always

    However, with more and more detecting method being added into warden, it's getting harder and harder to implement it and the worth and the effect of doing this must be taken into consideration.
    Last edited by zys924; 01-15-2010 at 06:24 AM.

  14. #29
    Elitetech's Avatar Contributor
    Reputation
    98
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    279
    Thanks G/R
    3/7
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by WannaBeProgrammer View Post
    Every thing can be detected nothing is undetecable.
    Lol @ you fixing Oddball's post.
    Knowledge is often mistaken for intelligence. This is like mistaking a cup of milk for a cow.

  15. #30
    Albedo's Avatar Contributor
    Reputation
    171
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    562
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by zys924 View Post
    permanently undetection is impossible.

    it's always a matter of time to ban a public hack if BLZ wants to...

    The only way to use hack for long is to develop a hack in a currently undetectable way on your own and keep it private always

    However, with more and more detecting method being added into warden, it's getting harder and harder to implement it and the worth and the effect of doing this must be taken into consideration.
    Wowinfinity seems to be getting away with it, and has been for quite some time.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. [SOURCE SAMPLE] Run protected Lua - 3.3.5a
    By satia in forum WoW Memory Editing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-17-2010, 10:04 AM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-13-2010, 01:36 AM
  3. [3.3.2] AUTOIT - Run Protected LUA
    By satia in forum WoW Memory Editing
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 06-19-2010, 08:58 AM
  4. Run Protected Lua in 3.3.3a
    By thefarmer in forum WoW Bots Questions & Requests
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-30-2010, 08:03 PM
  5. [Release] LuaNinja - Run protected Lua code
    By Cypher in forum World of Warcraft Bots and Programs
    Replies: 1047
    Last Post: 01-27-2010, 12:13 PM
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:09 AM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3
Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Google Authenticator verification provided by Two-Factor Authentication (Free) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Digital Point modules: Sphinx-based search