GnomeTools - WoW BOT menu

User Tag List

Page 50 of 96 FirstFirst ... 464748495051525354 ... LastLast
Results 736 to 750 of 1434
  1. #736
    mgX's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    39
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    98
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by Pixion View Post
    So, why aren't all Pirox users banned ?
    Everybody would be banned for a while now if blizz wanted to ban AutoIt users.
    Simple, as you should know, blizzard ban ppl in waves for botting. there can be many months between the big ban waves. Other cheating like teleportation, speedhack, exploiting, is banned on the spot. Dont you think that it would be stupid to ban bot programs on the spot? would be too easy to see whether your program is detectable or not. Bot bans from player reports, are made on the spot aswell, where software detection is done in waves.


    The fact that you choose to make your bot in autoit with its limitations, clearly shows that perhaps it is you who doesnt understand how thigns work...

    GnomeTools - WoW BOT
  2. #737
    Pixion's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    59
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    289
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't know many things about Warden, yeah, I know that.
    But WHY shoud AutoIt be more detectable than other langages...?
    EDIT: Sorry, the question is more "If they can find an AutoIt program, they can also find others programs coded in C#, C...".

    And I have my reasons for having chose AutoIt.
    Last edited by Pixion; 06-08-2009 at 02:57 PM.

  3. #738
    Dybberg's Avatar Banned
    Reputation
    2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    46
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    have any users got banned with gnometools? i have succesfully botted my priest from 1-48 now, in a week, or something like that, and now im wierd, is it SAFE to continue? will they detect me easy if I get reported or what? please answer

  4. #739
    Pixion's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    59
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    289
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There has ALWAYS been player report bans...
    Atm, nothing told us the BOT was software detected.

    But yes, I think some have been, just BOT taking care where you BOT, when...
    Same as always...

  5. #740
    mgX's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    39
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    98
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by Pixion View Post
    I don't know many things about Warden, yeah, I know that.
    But WHY shoud AutoIt be more detectable than other langages...?
    EDIT: Sorry, the question is more "If they can find an AutoIt program, they can also find others programs coded in C#, C...".

    And I have my reasons for having chose AutoIt.
    Ofc they can detect any language whatsoever...it doesnt matter... I just dont like autoit personally, since i seriously hate basic, and i hate not having alot of control regarding how i hook shit and import stuff...

    Originally Posted by Dybberg View Post
    have any users got banned with gnometools? i have succesfully botted my priest from 1-48 now, in a week, or something like that, and now im wierd, is it SAFE to continue? will they detect me easy if I get reported or what? please answer
    Software detection is completely diffrent from playerreports... For player reports, it would be a GM handing out the suspension and starting a case against you. GMs have no say in softwaredetection.


    Basically you have to see softwaredetection like antivirus and virus (and yes i am well aware of antivirus employing certain algorithms to passively detect vira they dont know about, but i exclude that here). You can only detect what you know is there, which is why private bots are working fine without ever getting any heat. Public bots usually get added to the infamous "blacklist" of stuff blizzard checks for. GnomeTools offers no cloaking (sorry, too much scifi and eve online :P) whatsoever, making it piece a cake to catch if they really want to. As i see it, its probably just a matter of time untill it attracts the wrath of the warden-god, and gets on the naughtylist, that is, if its not already there, which would mean that you are already flagged for banning the next wave.

  6. #741
    Dybberg's Avatar Banned
    Reputation
    2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    46
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    okey, but do you know about blizzard, can they se if im online to much? cause ive been online 3 days now on my priest without any logoff

  7. #742
    Pixion's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    59
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    289
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Whatever happens, I'm not able to fight versus Blizzard.
    One guy versus a big industry as Blizz / Vivendi...

    We'll see in the future.

    EDIT : i'm botting my char 24/24 to test BOT, Ifarmu is too, there is no problems...
    EDIT2 : mgX, sorry for maybe having underestimated you, but please, dont talk about AutoIt capicities etc...I'm aware about the restrictions it gives, etc...
    Last edited by Pixion; 06-08-2009 at 03:24 PM.

  8. #743
    Dybberg's Avatar Banned
    Reputation
    2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    46
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    okey, cheers

  9. #744
    mgX's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    39
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    98
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by Dybberg View Post
    okey, but do you know about blizzard, can they se if im online to much? cause ive been online 3 days now on my priest without any logoff
    dont worry about that lol....ive bottet alot using some crappy homebrew c# bot (too lazy to make it do lots of stuff). Also used glider and innerspace extensively.... Luckily i have avoided the banwaves by not actually doing anything back when new detectionmethods were added. Glider fell initially, because of a bug in the shadowdriver (funny thing is, even after, it was still detectable if you knew where to look, but apparently blizzard didnt feel like invading too much of your privacy on your pc, probably to avoid lawsuits...). Innerspace was defeated when they started checking for code detours within wow itself, and not with warden, which as i understand it, lax wasnt aware of at the time, since he only monitored new versions of warden, and not the possibilities of extra detection added inside wow itself. The code detour check was defeated after it was discovered, but lax discontinued the project for some reason. Perhaps in fear of lawsuits similar to the one glider is facing atm.



    So, my advice to people who wishes to continue botting: grab a book and start learning some programming and make your own bot. Dont use stuff available to the public, and you should be alright. Oh yea, and avoid manipulating certain areas in the wow memory space, like position and speed. Last i checked, warden didnt monitor the orientation...

  10. #745
    Dybberg's Avatar Banned
    Reputation
    2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    46
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    okey cheers, but if oyu reccomend ppl to make own bot, where shall we start?

  11. #746
    Sychotix's Avatar Moderator Authenticator enabled
    Reputation
    1445
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    4,005
    Thanks G/R
    296/589
    Trade Feedback
    1 (100%)
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    start by learning your own language.

  12. #747
    quakeon's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    18
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think I'm gonna try it ty

  13. #748
    harger's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    9
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    as silly as it sounds but i learned a bit delphi in school. with some addons and the new "interact with target" and the old "click to move" button its pretty easy to build a pixel reading bot with sending keystrokes. no injection, no memory reading just tabbing thru the mobs and following a waypoint profile. so its no matter of the language you choose, its a matter how smart you solve problems.

  14. #749
    mgX's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    39
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    98
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by harger View Post
    as silly as it sounds but i learned a bit delphi in school. with some addons and the new "interact with target" and the old "click to move" button its pretty easy to build a pixel reading bot with sending keystrokes. no injection, no memory reading just tabbing thru the mobs and following a waypoint profile. so its no matter of the language you choose, its a matter how smart you solve problems.
    memoryreading is just as detectable as pixelreading :P If you look at how crap like nProtect and GameGuard works, they are considerably more powerful in comparison to warden.... They hook windows dlls and monitor readprocessmemory, sendinput etc, which is the lowest level of the API one can manipulate.


    Investigated some more, and it seems that warden currently doesnt detect GnomeTools, nor any other autoit bot. Pretty fun actually, the features to detect these were temporarily disabled some years ago, probably since they werent needed to detect the most common bots like innerspace and glider, which were defeated initially by their own attempts at hiding themselves... Makes you speculate eh?


    Sent some thoughts on how to improve gnometools to make it harder to detect to Pix...

    (sorry about the lousy english, im writing this 20mins before an oral exam in imaterial law, so im sorta psyched....)
    Last edited by mgX; 06-09-2009 at 04:52 AM.

  15. #750
    bwigga's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    9
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by deathormar View Post
    using the bot tool is so bad for the game
    probably the wrong forum to sign up to ....

Page 50 of 96 FirstFirst ... 464748495051525354 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. WoW bot
    By Zim in forum World of Warcraft General
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-04-2006, 08:11 AM
  2. Any WoW bot at all
    By Octagon in forum World of Warcraft General
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-19-2006, 05:37 AM
  3. WoW bot program. NOT wow glider
    By Disphotic in forum World of Warcraft General
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-17-2006, 12:39 PM
  4. [WoW Bot] WoW Glider Full Version 0.6.8
    By Matt in forum World of Warcraft Bots and Programs
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 05-08-2006, 12:15 AM
  5. World of Warcraft WoW!Bot (GetALifeBot) 0.61 for WoW 1.9.4 + FishBot
    By Matt in forum World of Warcraft Bots and Programs
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 04-18-2006, 04:55 AM
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 AM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3
Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Google Authenticator verification provided by Two-Factor Authentication (Free) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Digital Point modules: Sphinx-based search