Farmer John bot

[Karbeck]

[korknob]

Themida is a .exe protector to prevent it from being reverse engineered. It's a false positive.

[kataldt]

Themida is a .exe protector to prevent it from being reverse engineered. It's a false positive.

I read on your website you're considering allowing up to 5 WoW accounts per key?

How true is this and when do you think it'll be implemented?

I'm VERY interested in this bot, but I don't want to be limited to ONE of my multiple accounts.

[zasuel]

Nice bot. Little slow because it types out everything, but it's nice if you can't afford Glider.

[anthony1981]

Iv just got this bot waiting for the activation to try it out and will let you all know how it goes cant wait to try it

[Nonominator]

I use it daily. WAY better than GLIDER or MIMIC.

[UnknOwned]

I use it daily. WAY better than GLIDER or MIMIC.

I would agree that both bots are not directly superb (ppather for glider however does help alot). But in what "way" would FarmerJhon be "WAY" better than thoes two?
From what i can see it cannot repair, cast spells, sell stuff. It overall seem very very limited compared to glider, and taking the DLL injection into consideration its not clear to me why it cannot do these things, without "typing" or using 3rd party addons.

[luciferc]

Farmer john bot only does Wow accounts by themself and has only waypoints. So until i see it can mail,train,fly,vendor,harvest and quest like ppather i am gonna stick w/ Glider.

[korknob]

I try to limit the amount of injection I do and rely on third party add-ons for functionality because it's "more legit" looking. I could call the casting/repairing/selling through injected code but choose not to. I do have hotkey scanning implemented but only for warrior atm (will be extended to other classes).

Glider is a perfectly capable bot and if you're happy with it you have no reason to switch. My bot's appeal lies in its simplicity in set up and cost over time (no monthly fee's for extra features). Also consider the fact that I have a significantly smaller user base and no ban waves.

[UnknOwned]

I try to limit the amount of injection I do and rely on third party add-ons for functionality because it's "more legit" looking. I could call the casting/repairing/selling through injected code but choose not to. I do have hotkey scanning implemented but only for warrior atm (will be extended to other classes).

Glider is a perfectly capable bot and if you're happy with it you have no reason to switch. My bot's appeal lies in its simplicity in set up and cost over time (no monthly fee's for extra features). Also consider the fact that I have a significantly smaller user base and no ban waves.

hmm... ok.
Since as you say it does have a limited userbase you could easily go for alot more functions via calls.. if not 100% calls. Would make it a much better bot.

The other way around... what do you use the injection for? loot?

[korknob]

I call Interact() for looting while running in the background, although there is a command to switch to non-injection based. I leave it to the user to decide.

Wasn't wowSharp 100% injection based and then detected easily?

[Crema]

read ze bolded big thing

Look at the original thread.. It doesnt say that he developed it personally.. That, sir is bannable offence.

[Cypher]

I try to limit the amount of injection I do and rely on third party add-ons for functionality because it's "more legit" looking. I could call the casting/repairing/selling through injected code but choose not to. I do have hotkey scanning implemented but only for warrior atm (will be extended to other classes).

Glider is a perfectly capable bot and if you're happy with it you have no reason to switch. My bot's appeal lies in its simplicity in set up and cost over time (no monthly fee's for extra features). Also consider the fact that I have a significantly smaller user base and no ban waves.

First off, you're totally wrong about addons being "more legit" looking. Warden does not look for function calls, nor does it look for addons. Using injection you'd have a much more reliable system if implemented correctly. It would also make hotkey scanning totally redundant as you could cast spells and use abilities directly.

The lack of banwaves has nothing to do with the implementation. Its due to the fact you're a tiny fish in a massive proverbial sea.

I call Interact() for looting while running in the background, although there is a command to switch to non-injection based. I leave it to the user to decide.

Wasn't wowSharp 100% injection based and then detected easily?

As soon as you make a single function call you're as vulnerable to a stack trace as someone making a thousand. In for a penny, in for a pound.

WoW!Sharp was detected because it was hugely popular, along with the fact it had inadequate warden protection. Please stop spreading your FUD here, enough of that ignorant shit in the mem editing section.

[Nonominator]

Cypher, I have one question... Where can I get your bot that does a better job than this one? Did'nt think so. You just lost Mr.Knowitall!

[korknob]

okie dokie. I'm not intentionally fear mongering. Thank you for clarifying the situation. I was under the impression that using addons to do things would be safer. Aren't there addons that are scanned for? I read about a bot that generated it's own addon when it ran for the first time and gave it a random name as a safety precaution. I guess they were illinformed?

Also - FJB users can run entirely without injection if they choose.

Again, thanks for sharing information with the rest of us so we can be as 1337 as you.