Solution to the scary rep trading fiasco

[idusy]

Remove this:


(stupidmspaintjpgsavequality)



It, sort of, in some ways, some how, implies that it's courteous for one to give someone the same Reputation back in turn.

Some n00bs could see this as something like "repping me back" would be perfectly acceptable.

Silly n00bs. Always reading stuff and stuff.

[Gash]

lol. this is so wierd, i never thought about it. x)

[Erase]

Let them rep trade them.. When an admin finds out they just get -150 rep instead? :]

[ßetray]

Let them rep trade them.. When an admin finds out they just get -150 rep instead? :]

That usually requires 1 of the parties to report the incident, which generally doesn't happen.

[Forever]

That usually requires 1 of the parties to report the incident, which generally doesn't happen.

Well they got no reason to report it because they both benefit and with regard to that message it's considered acceptable.

I would find it strange though if the staff have never thought about this..

[2dgreengiant]

That usually requires 1 of the parties to report the incident, which generally doesn't happen.

You would be quite surprised.

[Dombo]

Has been suggested before, never got dealt with. They said they'de fix it but they haven't

[Zing!]

Always wondered why it still says that in the rep popup.

[Confidence]

Interesting, I never actually thought of it in that way. When I read it at first, all it meant to me was "If you rep this person for contributing, you might be lucky enough to get rep from others for contributing, too," but I can see how this can have a double meaning.

[Iaccidentallytwink]

Wow. Never though of it that wow. That's pretty humorous.

[Equ1N0X]

I remember thinking this the very first time i saw that new rep popup.

MANY REP TRADERS. HANDLE IT.

[Vindicated]

I love how people are calling it "scary"... sounds like adults talking about kids doing stuff. But yeah been suggested, and was rejected.

[KuRIoS]

noted .