21 five years olds, haha
21 five years olds, haha
33 kids cause im a pretty big guy
29 for me. I could definately take more I think. Using a kid as a weapon would be critical to my success.
i would just whirlwind and then roundhouse kick, a combonation of both of those. my roundhouse kick cooldown is like 4 seconds, which my whirlwind takes 3 seconds, so i have 1 second of being defenseless.
So in the long run if i was wearing my stamina gear, i ran the numbers of the matter and i came up with this number. I would be able to take on about 1,358,658.5 the other half of that one is a Siamese twin.
Edit:
Lol, did not know it was a survey.
i could take on 33, but that is obviously a way to low number.
"To hell with morality, I'd be too busy pile-driving, crane-kicking, and bare-knuckle bashing them all the way back to kintergarten" <!~~ exact quote, they spelled kindergarten wrong.
Last edited by BrightChild; 04-04-2008 at 12:54 AM.
31 5y/o kids.. aint that a bit low for helicoptering them to death?
101, 73, 31, 11
28 hahaha xD im best![]()
36 ^^ *checks pockets* Hmm, think its time to go get some lunch money...
I could only take on 20. Then again, I get to practice every day with my sis.![]()
Dreams are just that, dreams. Forever out of reach. Suppose you were to fulfill it, what then? Man wants what he cannot have, and once he has it, he no longer wants it.
32 and I'm 14.
23. Meh not that bad :\
Trying is the First step towards faliure. Snitchstianity
22. Qtf how hard can at least 40 be? a few spinning kicks and face plants O and peoples elbows.
[72;101;108;108;111;32;109;121;32;110;97;109;101;32;
105;115;32;68;97;114;114;101;110;0]
You could take on 33 five year old kids in a fight.
lol.. I like the question about taking on a crowd or fighting off a zerg in a game such as Starcraft.. haha
lol 36 for me i aint never havin kids specially a bunch of 5 year olds lmao XD
27
(filler)
28/flex