PoeHUD - Overlay for Path of Exile

[datz]

thanks frank i like urs alot the green loot for urself is dope

[FrankTheCrazy]

thanks frank i like urs alot the green loot for urself is dope

Not my version. I just checked and compiled someone else who did the work to remove the memory writes

[spazman6117]

https://mega.co.nz/#!ZQA31JAL!qeaPGj...20GDTiHmWgm8X8
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/b...is/1421384574/

FAQ:
Why is this so BIG?! The source + packages are included.
Why is the EXE so BIG?! Because the exe now has more packages on it because this author decided it need them :/
HUH? and it now uses settings.json for settings.
ZUG? and it now targets .NET 4.5 and not 4.
BUH? and it now is more customizable!

I think that covers it.

Then why didnt you just compile it to make it smaller?

[FrankTheCrazy]

Then why didnt you just compile it to make it smaller?

because I was too lazy to change ANY of the settings the original author had :shh:

[droopie28]

because I was too lazy to change ANY of the settings the original author had :shh:

serioiusly, lol, I'm not complaining at all!

[HvC]

because I was too lazy to change ANY of the settings the original author had :shh:

It'd be really nice if you credited the author of the changes huh ?

[ralyeh]

Why is this so BIG?! The source + packages are included.

...wonder why r included the packages?

[arthemis1er]

Love the FAQ

[SpaceGuy119]

https://mega.co.nz/#!ZQA31JAL!qeaPGj...20GDTiHmWgm8X8
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/b...is/1421384574/

FAQ:
Why is this so BIG?! The source + packages are included.
Why is the EXE so BIG?! Because the exe now has more packages on it because this author decided it need them :/
HUH? and it now uses settings.json for settings.
ZUG? and it now targets .NET 4.5 and not 4.
BUH? and it now is more customizable!

I think that covers it.

does this mean i need to DL a new netframe or something?

also, for what GGG implemented, is this a sure bypass? or are we just winging it and taking a stab. I'm going to use it, but I just want to know the risk factor I'm putting myself through for the hacks that I use. Thanks

[FrankTheCrazy]

It'd be really nice if you credited the author of the changes huh ?

I did give you credit. I posted a number of times which code I was using. I will edit my post now to make that clearer.

...wonder why r included the packages?

Because the original author has the packages.config setup to do so

does this mean i need to DL a new netframe or something?

also, for what GGG implemented, is this a sure bypass? or are we just winging it and taking a stab. I'm going to use it, but I just want to know the risk factor I'm putting myself through for the hacks that I use. Thanks

It MIGHT have problems if you do not have .NET 4.5 installed. If you run win8 then you don't need to install anything.

THIS IS NOT A BYPASS.

The scanner has the tech to find this and flag your account. It currently does not appear to be targeting anything other than maphack and bots BUT it still has the ability NOW for finding this.

[HvC]

Y U NO GIB MEH CREDIT?!

<3

Oh and if it just checks crc32 of the names of opened processes and for maphack my version should be safe.
It can even go and look at what processes have open handles to it for all I care since the hash and name of the HUD are randomized at each run with my latest commits.

[FrankTheCrazy]

<3

Oh and if it just checks crc32 of the names of opened processes and for maphack my version should be safe.
It can even go and look at what processes have open handles to it for all I care since the hash and name of the HUD are randomized at each run with my latest commits.

np man, that was on me forgetting to give you credit there

as for your version, it is as safe as it can be but there is always a chance GGG could enhance the scanner to find it hence the warning that this does not bypass the scanner.

[HvC]

np man, that was on me forgetting to give you credit there

as for your version, it is as safe as it can be but there is always a chance GGG could enhance the scanner to find it hence the warning that this does not bypass the scanner.

Well I was thinking to switch from RPM to WinIo but that'd take a bit of work and I don't think they'd go as far as to hook RPM... I hope... that'd be further than VAC or PB has ever gone.

[Ouariasse]

change the exe + window name and it's undetected.

[HvC]

change the exe + window name and it's undetected.

Well then I am safe. That's what I thought though.