WoW Travel bot(for now...)

[lanman92]

I'm working on my travel bot, and was wondering how you can make this code work once again, after I stop recording waypoints.

 
private void Run()
{
while (running)
{
if (om.DistanceTo(m_parent.wm.lastWaypoint()) >= 10f || m_parent.wm.waypoints.Count == 0)
{
m_parent.wm.waypoints.Add(new Location(om.X, om.Y, om.Z));
}
Thread.Sleep(0x10);
}
}

I have it running in a thread on it's own while I'm alt-tabbed into wow. I'm not sure how to do this, it throws the exception object reference not set to instance or w/e.

[Apoc]

I'm working on my travel bot, and was wondering how you can make this code work once again, after I stop recording waypoints.

 
private void Run()
{
while (running)
{
if (om.DistanceTo(m_parent.wm.lastWaypoint()) >= 10f || m_parent.wm.waypoints.Count == 0)
{
m_parent.wm.waypoints.Add(new Location(om.X, om.Y, om.Z));
}
Thread.Sleep(0x10);
}
}

I have it running in a thread on it's own while I'm alt-tabbed into wow. I'm not sure how to do this, it throws the exception object reference not set to instance or w/e.

You should stop using other people's work. (The Thread.Sleep(0x10) gave it away, that only comes from disassemblers.)

[lanman92]

Idk what you are talking about. I started this project on my own. I guess I'll finish it on my own...(The reason I used hex for my sleep duration is just habit. Didn't mean to.)

Think what you want, but I do need some help. I'm working on my pathforwards and pathbackwards functions. My backwards function works fine, but my forward function seems to be adding points to my list(wm.waypoints). I thought it might be that my thread from the path creator wasn't dying, but it doesn't seem to be that. I ran the debugger with it, breakpointing, and I couldn't find where the points were getting added.

I'm almost sure there's a better way to end an otherwise infinite thread, but I'm just zeroing a bool condition and aborting.

Here's my running function(in a thread):

private void runForwards()
{
int index = 0;
while (index < (wm.waypoints.Count - 1))
{
movement.GoTo(wm.waypoints[index]);
while (movement.moving == 0x4)
Thread.Sleep(25);
index++;
}
}

[lanman92]

I fixed my previous issue, but now I need help with something painful. I'm making it display a map of the waypoints, but it's scaling it down way too far. Here's the code:

 
Graphics g = Graphics.FromImage(bm);
float XLow, YLow, XHigh, YHigh;
XLow = 0;
YLow = 0;
XHigh = 0;
YHigh = 0;
int index = 0;
XLow = m_parent.wm.waypoints[0].X;
YLow = m_parent.wm.waypoints[0].Y;
foreach (Location loc in m_parent.wm.waypoints)
{
if (XLow > loc.X)
XLow = loc.X;
if (YLow > loc.Y)
YLow = loc.Y;
if (YHigh < loc.Y)
YHigh = loc.Y;
if (XHigh < loc.X)
XHigh = loc.X;
}
List<Point> offsets = new List<Point>();
foreach (Location loc in m_parent.wm.waypoints)
{
offsets.Add(new Point(Convert.ToInt32(loc.X - XLow), Convert.ToInt32(loc.Y - YLow)));
}
float scaleX = XHigh - XLow;
if (scaleX < 0)
scaleX = scaleX * (-1);
float scaleY = YHigh - YLow;
if (scaleY < 0)
scaleY = scaleY * (-1);
scaleX = (pictureBox1.Width / 2) / scaleX;
scaleY = (pictureBox1.Height / 2) / scaleY;
foreach (Point p in offsets)
{
float newX = p.X * scaleX;
float newY = p.Y * scaleY;
newX = (pictureBox1.Width / 2) + newX;
newY = (pictureBox1.Height / 2) + newY;
wps.Add(new Point(Convert.ToInt32(newX), Convert.ToInt32(newY)));
}
foreach (Point pt in wps)
{
bm.SetPixel(pt.X, pt.Y, Color.Red);
g.DrawEllipse(new Pen(Brushes.Blue, 1), new Rectangle(pt.X - 5, pt.Y - 5, 10, 10));
 
}
while ((index + 1) <= (m_parent.wm.waypoints.Count - 1))
{
g.DrawLine(new Pen(Brushes.Green, 1f), wps[index], wps[index + 1]);
index++;
}

I was hoping on some advice to improve this. I want it so that it will display any size of map, that's why I have the center of my picturebox being in the origin, but I think that may be my issue. I guess it's a possibility that I have to rewrite my code, but I'd rather not. Any suggestions?(BTW Apoc, I hope you don't think this is someone else's code as well, because I just wrote it tonight... Not to mention you're probably the only one here to help)