Immortal bot seems to be detactable by Warden!

[Stede]

Not sure who MaiN is - VS dev team? Because right now, IB is still being updated. So if he is on the dev team - thanks for helping and hopefully he can figure something out to get around the issue. If not, then, I'd still wait for the release version of the bot to get updated.

[kallellkryptonite]

Not sure who MaiN is - VS dev team? Because right now, IB is still being updated. So if he is on the dev team - thanks for helping and hopefully he can figure something out to get around the issue. If not, then, I'd still wait for the release version of the bot to get updated.

No, he's not related to the IB team in anyway. He just knows his shit. By him saying that Warden is detecting IB (along with most people's assumptions that it has no anti-warden), i would recommend staying the **** away from that bot if you value your account.

[Stede]

No, he's not related to the IB team in anyway. He just knows his shit. By him saying that Warden is detecting IB (along with most people's assumptions that it has no anti-warden), i would recommend staying the **** away from that bot if you value your account.

Ah ok. So the OP tested a non-current or beta / unreleased version of the bot.

I think that's a pretty critical piece of information to include :/

[kallellkryptonite]

Ah ok. So the OP tested a non-current or beta / unreleased version of the bot.

I think that's a pretty critical piece of information to include :/

No, i dont think you're understanding. He tested the latest version of IB. The thing is, IB has never had any sort of anti-warden / warden monitoring built it. It's just a bot that injects code. It gets the job done fast and efficiently, but it's not safe. The reason no one has been banned YET using ib, is because A-Warden wasnt loaded, B-Warden wasnt active, C-warden didnt have a hash for IB.

The TLDR version of the OPs post is saying in IB's current state, Warden is picking it up according to someone who knows their shit (and warden quite well).

[Stede]

No, i dont think you're understanding. He tested the latest version of IB. The thing is, IB has never had any sort of anti-warden / warden monitoring built it. It's just a bot that injects code. It gets the job done fast and efficiently, but it's not safe. The reason no one has been banned YET using ib, is because A-Warden wasnt loaded, B-Warden wasnt active, C-warden didnt have a hash for IB.

The TLDR version of the OPs post is saying in IB's current state, Warden is picking it up according to someone who knows their shit (and warden quite well).

No, I understand. There is no current release version of IB. Anybody who is running IB right now is running an unreleased beta. Their customer portal has no working version released since the patch available for download. So - to the best of my information, I don't see how a current release version is being tested. The thread has a good message - the tested version of IB is confirmed as detectable.

I'm just making the point that we've yet to see what VS has done to the release version since the patch. We can hope or pray or wave hands or whatever that VS is aware of the issue and is working on it.

[kallellkryptonite]

No, I understand. There is no current release version of IB. Anybody who is running IB right now is running an unreleased beta. Their customer portal has no working version released since the patch available for download. So - to the best of my information, I don't see how a current release version is being tested. The thread has a good message - the tested version of IB is confirmed as detectable.

I'm just making the point that we've yet to see what VS has done to the release version since the patch. We can hope or pray or wave hands or whatever that VS is aware of the issue and is working on it.

Gotcha, i might have just read what you said wrong previously.

[Liis]

I've pointed that out too, that the current version that I got, was not made after the patch. It is, however, currently the latest version and working.
But seeing that IB never have been focused on protection, I personally doubt they'd start now. (I really hope they do though, since it is a damn fine and effective bot)

And I'd be glad to test the new version once it comes out, if Main is up for doing another check.

Hope this clarifies things.

[MaiN]

I am actually part of the Buddy team, so I am in no way affiliated with Immortal Bot. If that means you don't believe me, fine.
I am, however, member of the elite memory editing section. And the people in there will be able to confirm what I am saying in 10-15 minutes if they want to check it themselves.

[mac2o]

There is no Immortal bot for the current patch i wonder how do u test it?

[Liis]

There is no Immortal bot for the current patch i wonder how do u test it?

As I stated earlier, we used the currently latest version. You're free to think that IB will be updated with some kind of antiwarden if you'd like though. I am, personally, not betting on it.

[anthonylokrn]

There is no Immortal bot for the current patch i wonder how do u test it?

1.43 is released that works with the new patch..though it is still in beta.

[FLinden]

they dont official release a new bot for the new version yet ... few ppl that cant wait are using 1.43 ...

will wait for official release ;D

[Stede]

I've pointed that out too, that the current version that I got, was not made after the patch. It is, however, currently the latest version and working.
But seeing that IB never have been focused on protection, I personally doubt they'd start now. (I really hope they do though, since it is a damn fine and effective bot)

And I'd be glad to test the new version once it comes out, if Main is up for doing another check.

Hope this clarifies things.

Ah I see - my mistake for missing that. In reference to your next post: I wouldn't bet on it too much, either :/


@MaiN - wasn't trying to take a swipe at you or anything - I just didn't know if you had access to something that the rest of us didn't. Thanks for the heads-up. Have you tested any other bots in this manner and if so, can you comment on the results?

[megabbyte]

Sorry to see this outcome Liis, I had truely hoped that it wouldnt be the case, specially since I dont know if warden was scanning for this few days ago,., I turned my bots off after thepress release tho.. Oh well I already sold my gold on that char... NOW IT IS TIME TO WATCH AGGER KILL RONALDO!

Denmark lost to Portugal? Cheers Pepe! Portugal owned Denmark.

In relation to Immortalbot, you use immortal bot again? Or you waiting for something new?

[Toney]

BTW there's an unofficial 1.43 up in the Customer Portal. Any chance someone could take a look to see if it's detected? :O