[Area Change] Durotar affected by X3, Cataclysm (downlaod)

[Aryzar]

As some of you may know it is possible that in the following expansion, Cataclysm, Blizzard will *green* Durotar up. Durotar, a coastal zone will most certainly be affected by cataclysm so I was interested of how would the zone look. I strongly recommend also using the Barrens reskin I've made.

The following link includes both reskin's: MEGAUPLOAD - The leading online storage and file delivery service





Aaaand.. a slideshow: http://img7.imageshack.us/slideshow/...0809155425.jpg

[Flipt]

isn't it meant to have like fires and stuff around it like in the barrens video or?
+rep for good work

[r3deemer]

Isnt durotar getting split in 2 by some gigantic chasm?
Other than that the piccies look good. might have to check this one out when wow gets back up xD

[Aryzar]

Durotar is not Barrens and the crack of Barrens opens south of durotar in in the eastern Barrens as I remember from the vid.
What I thought of Durotar was that It will be affected of temporary floods and heavy rainfall which could easily bring life to the place.

[~sInX]

Meh. Try to make it look more like this throughout:

Taken from my Dashen'o world build. Then i'll use it :P As i said in your barrens thread, this doesn't represent old durotar, as old durotar was quite genuinly a jungle.

[Aryzar]

Yes ur right this doesent represent old Durotar as it is not what I meant and making it more like ur's will make it banable on live servers and unoriginal. This is Durotar after it healed itself.

[~sInX]

doing it like yours will make it illegal

No, it won't. It will give bliz the right to suspend the player's game time by 3 days or perm depending on their past offences, but mine is in NO Way illegal as are any other world building methods. Bliz run this risk when they release the game thus the disclaimer; resulting in the ban performed by bliz.

Neways, world builds shouldnt be used on retail servers regardless.

[Aryzar]

Yeah, but i'm thinking of using this reskin on live. Yeah, I used the wrong word should've said "banable"