is arcemu a good core for a large server?

[Watercycle]

like title says = ), cause i want to make a public private server, but idk which bug has the least bugs with a good source, and is ment to hold so many.

mangos is a small one, easy to set up, no source, aka forums to get help from or anything, ain't got that many bugs, but it still doesn't seem right X D

i've only seen arcemu and mangos specificly so far, if you got any suggestions on whats a good core with small amount of bugs = P

thanks! :wave:

[Vindicated]

ArcEmu - Player cap and security
MaNGOS - More features but less players (P.S. there is a source for MaNGOS :P)

[Watercycle]

really?, never saw no mango's hompage = (

see, arcemu is perfect, but one problem in that perfect, idk how to script for there messed up features = P

[Watercycle]

If scripting is how those kind of things are fixed*, pvp n the raids are the biggest problem, but the worst is a few completely broken spells

[Algorithm]

ArcEmu - Player cap and security
MaNGOS - More features but less players (P.S. there is a source for MaNGOS :P)

yes Arcemu has better player cap . But Aremu is not an emulator to have when you have 1800+ online daily. Not that it takes almost 90% of your processor *and i have quad core xeons*on just loading. It uses way to much resources and its unstable.
As far as security?? cant compare mangos security and anti cheat engines with Arcemu. On mangos you have less chance spell stacking, talent stacking e.t.c . As far as hacking goes, no matter what Emu you use, if someone wants to really hack your shit, they will

If you want to run a server with aot of players, you need Hearthstone or Trinity Core

However if you want to run a medium population server , Arcemu is very good for it.. all scripted , working correctly LUA engine, vmaps. has optional config for instant level , and e.t.c

[Herleybob]

eww arcemu. Try aspire... it is based off the same engine(ascent). And get updated.