Probably the greatest thing ever to grace the internet.

[Mizzypoo]

http://www.pakin.org/complaint/

Basically it is a complaint generater, which will produce complaints almost impossible to read. It comes in handy A LOT. An example of the work.


I know this topic has been beaten to death lately, but something needs to be said. We need to educate others about the manifestos and positions of the most combative braggarts I've ever seen. I guess I should start by saying that I don't believe that MMOwned acts in the public interest. So when it says that that's what I believe, I see how little it understands my position. Although MMOwned has unfairly depicted me and those who share my beliefs as slumlords and knuckle-draggers, we are neither. Yes, the worst sorts of cocky ex-cons I've ever seen have an insatiable appetite for its dulcet but whiney piffle, but MMOwned's cheerleaders are merely ciphers. MMOwned is the one who decides whether or not to declare a national emergency, round up everyone who disagrees with it, and put them in concentration camps. MMOwned is the one who gives out the orders to create an unwelcome climate for those of us who are striving to give our young people the values that will inspire them to raise the quality of debate on issues surrounding its rotten cock-and-bull stories. And MMOwned is the one trying to conceal how by brainwashing its cat's-paws with terrorism, it makes them easy to lead, easy to program, and easy to enslave.

I've already said this a thousand times and with a thousand different phrasings, but I believe I have finally figured out what makes organizations like MMOwned fight with spiritual weapons that are as neo-backwards as they are stuck-up. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one's own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world. MMOwned does not want to help incorrigible fugitives evade capture by the authorities because it is repressive, deranged, rash, and censorious (though, granted, MMOwned is all of the aforementioned), but rather because MMOwned's reports cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that MMOwned is known for its sound judgment, unerring foresight, and sagacious adaptation of means to ends. I am confident that genuine patriots will perceive the veracity of my statements regarding MMOwned's chthonic précis. Do I blame society for this? No, I blame MMOwned.

MMOwned has endorsed the idea of purblind particularism in a number of specific ways, arguing, for instance, in favor of its legates' decision to engender ill will. Every time MMOwned utters or writes a statement that supports alcoholism -- even indirectly -- it sends a message that MMOwned's mistakes are always someone else's fault. I unequivocally believe we mustn't let it make such statements, partly because deep down, it knows that I'm right, but primarily because it constantly insists that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. But it contradicts itself when it says that the few of us who complain regularly about its canards are simply spoiling the party. MMOwned wants to caricature and stereotype people from other cultures. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis. Considering that if we submit to MMOwned's definition of "orbiculatoelliptical" and become scary, we have lost the war for self-preservation, I offer that it's easy to tell if MMOwned's lying. If its lips are moving, it's lying. Anyway, that's it for this letter. Let MMOwned read it and weep.

[moonrabbit]

damn!
thats pretty cool.
haha.

[Peter.b]

i made one about my parents and then lold

[Enfeebleness]

Please don't show this to the WoW official forums

[Cheezeit117]

The furor over neopaganism has been an acutely frustrating cultural phenomenon: pregnant with great possibility, touching on vital and fascinating issues, yet initially formulated in a one-sided and mutinous manner that will condone illegal activities faster than you can say "cinematographical". What's important to note, however, is that Mr. Nirvana1221's modes of thought share many of the same characteristics. One of the first facts we should face is that someone has been giving Nirvana1221's brain a very thorough washing, and now Nirvana1221 is trying to do the same to us. I would never take a job working for him. Given his frowzy analects, who would want to?
For the record, Nirvana1221 ignores the most basic ground rule of debate. In case you're not familiar with it, that rule is: attack the idea, not the person. I'm sorry if I've gotten a little off track here, but I welcome his comments. However, he needs to realize that there is a problem here. A very large, perfidious, *******-out problem.
I, speaking as someone who is not a xenophobic pamphleteer, am not particularly fond of Nirvana1221. And here, I think, lies a clue to the intellectual vacuum so gapingly apparent in Nirvana1221's policies. If he gets his way, none of us will be able to think outside the box. Therefore, we must not let him have more impact on Earth's biological, geological, and chemical systems during our lifetime and our children's than all preceding human generations had together. Sure, even scary, pertinacious hypochondriacs may have some good points, but I have yet to find one. I am not trying to save the world -- I gave up that pursuit a long time ago. But I am trying to rage, rage against the dying of the light. Sure, we could just sit back and let Nirvana1221 increase alienation and delinquency among our young people, but that prospect really grates on people who have any kind of common sense.
In other words, I despise everything about Nirvana1221. I despise Nirvana1221's attempts to foist the most poisonously false and destructive myths imaginable upon us. I despise how he insists that he is forward-looking, open-minded, and creative. Most of all, I despise his complete obliviousness to the fact that his intent is to prevent us from asking questions. Nirvana1221 doesn't want the details checked. He doesn't want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts he presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of his "facts" are false. As one commentator put it, he is addicted to the feeling of power, to the idea of controlling people. Sadly, he has no real concern for the welfare or the destiny of the people he desires to lead. Although this has been overlooked or ignored by the established scientific community, Nirvana1221's message is apparently that he's merely trying to make this world a better place in which to live. Now, I could go off on that point alone, but like a verbal magician, he knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak.
Stroppy and hopeless, Nirvana1221's beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments) resemble a dilapidated shed. Kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will collapse, proving my claim that the central paradox of Nirvana1221's traducements, the twist that makes Nirvana1221's ethics so irresistible to disingenuous, scummy nitwits, is that these people truly believe that censorship could benefit us. We must take a proactive, rather than a reactive, stance. If we don't, future generations will not know freedom. Instead, they will know fear; they will know sadness; they will know injustice, poverty, and grinding despair. Most of all, they will realize, albeit far too late, that Nirvana1221 sometimes has trouble convincing people that we should avoid personal responsibility. When he has such trouble, he usually trots out a few muddleheaded brutes to constate authoritatively that the rest of us are an inferior group of people, fit only to be enslaved, beaten, and butchered at the whim of our betters. Whether or not that trick of his works, it's still the case that Nirvana1221 is greatly increasing the size of his improvident, cankered army of dirty polluters by needling and wheedling the worst kinds of inhumane apostates I've ever seen into it. Get that straight, please. Any other thinking is blame-shoving or responsibility-dodging. Furthermore, this is a lesson for those with eyes to see. It is a lesson not so much about Nirvana1221's imprudent behavior, but about the way that Nirvana1221 coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his campaigns sound like they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary. I enjoy the great diversity of humankind, in our food, our dress, our music, our literature, and our forms of spiritual expression. What I don't enjoy are Nirvana1221's hypocritical complaints which combine, in a rare mixture, bestial cruelty and an inconceivable gift for lying.
Nirvana1221 once heard an intransigent blowhard say, "Nirvana1221 can absorb mana by devouring his nemeses' brains." What's amazing is that Nirvana1221 was then able to use that quotation plus some anecdotal evidence to convince his gofers that it's perfectly safe to drink and drive, which unmistakably makes me wonder, "Why does the media consistently refuse to acknowledge that bad-tempered antidisestablishmentarianism is widespread and growing stronger as it permeates school systems, universities, and the media?" To ask that question another way, is he just trying to leave us in the lurch? That's the big question. If you knew the answer to that then you'd also know why it takes more than a mass of whiney converts to irrationalism to tell it like it is. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to reinforce the contentions of all reasonable people and confute those of splenetic, politically incorrect brigands. His favorite buzzword these days is "crisis". Nirvana1221 likes to tell us that we have a crisis on our hands. He then argues that the only reasonable approach to combat this crisis is for him to inject his lethal poison into our children's minds and souls. In my opinion, the real crisis is the dearth of people who understand that Nirvana1221's eccentricity is surpassed only by his vanity. And his vanity is surpassed only by his empty theorizing. (Remember his theory that the health effects of secondhand smoke are negligible?) Here's an idea: Instead of giving him the ability to encourage the acceptance of scapegoating and demonization, why don't we expose injustice and puncture prejudice? If we do, we'll then be able to give our young people the values that will inspire them to give him a rhadamanthine warning not to contaminate or cut off our cities' water supply.
All of these things are related: insurrectionism, Nirvana1221's endeavors, and the general breakdown of our society. I'll even tell you how they're related. It's really very simple. In essence, I have a hard time trying to reason with people who remain calm when they see Nirvana1221 divert us from proclaiming what in our innermost conviction is absolutely necessary.
After all, Nirvana1221's comrades can't defend their stances. If that fact hurts, get over it; it's called reality. And for another dose of reality, consider that Nirvana1221 is too wanton to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that I can't possibly believe his claim that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. If someone can convince me otherwise, I'll eat my hat. Heck, I'll eat a whole closetful of hats. That's a pretty safe bet because I unequivocally dislike Nirvana1221. Likes or dislikes, however, are irrelevant to observed facts, such as that I wonder what would happen if Nirvana1221 really did tell us how to live, what to say, what to think, what to know, and -- most importantly -- what not to know. There's a spooky thought. Now, I'm going to be honest here. Nirvana1221's effusions have caused widespread social alienation, and from this alienation a thousand social pathologies have sprung.
I can only provide people the wherewithal to examine Nirvana1221's worldview from the perspective of its axiology (values) and epistemology (ways of knowing) if Nirvana1221's slaphappy, craven peuplade is decimated down to those whose inborn lack of character permits them to betray anyone and everyone for the well-known thirty pieces of silver. As far as I can tell, I once told Nirvana1221 that the whole thrust of his allegations bothers me. How did he respond to that? He proceeded to curse me off using a number of colorful expletives not befitting this letter, which serves only to show that Nirvana1221 lives in a mental and emotional la-la land. Now, that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter. So let me corroborate it by saying that Nirvana1221 occasionally shows what appears to be warmth, joy, love, or compassion. You should realize, however, that these positive expressions are more feigned than experienced and invariably serve an ulterior motive, such as to leave behind a legacy of perpetual indebtedness in developing countries. Nirvana1221 has been trying hard to protect what has become a lucrative racket for him. Unfortunately, that lucrative racket has a hard-to-overlook consequence: it will apotheosize morally questionable, ostentatious ochlocrats one day. Of all of his exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands out: "Might makes right." I don't know where he came up with this, but his statement is dead wrong.
Nirvana1221 is not only woefully beer-guzzling, but terribly lethargic, but I won't linger on that. To get even the simplest message into the consciousness of hectoring self-proclaimed arbiters of taste and standards, it has to be repeated at least 50 times. Now, I don't want to insult your intelligence by telling you the following 50 times, but his publicity stunts can be subtle. They can be so subtle that many people never realize they're being influenced by them. That's why we must proactively notify humanity that Nirvana1221 is willing to promote truth and justice when it's convenient. But when it threatens his creature comforts, Nirvana1221 throws principle to the wind. Although we can occasionally tie the retailers of petty new claims to older fabrications, there is unfortunately no shortage of new rumor. Nirvana1221 is always prating about how divine ichor flows through his veins. (He used to say that his insidious club is a benign and charitable agency, but the evidence is too contrary, so he's given up on that score.) Many the things I've talked about in this letter are obvious. We all know they're true. But still it's necessary for us to say them, because Mr. Nirvana1221's particular brand of neurotic snobbism will impede the free flow of information quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "magnetohydrodynamics".

[Tristan]

I take exception to a few key aspects of King Cheezeit117's prank phone calls. The nitty-gritty of what I'm about to write is this: Cheezeit117's gestapo appears to be growing in number. I unequivocally pray that this is analogous to the flare-up of a candle just before extinction yet I keep reminding myself that anyone who hasn't been living in a cave with his eyes shut and his ears plugged knows that I myself don't want to build castles in the air. I don't want to plan things that I can't yet implement. But I do want to reveal some shocking facts about Cheezeit117's comments because doing so clearly demonstrates how the exclusionism "debate" is not a debate. It is a harangue, a politically motivated, brilliantly publicized, obstinate attack on progressive ideas. Cheezeit117 accuses me of being hate-filled, yet it is he who is filled with hate. And he accuses me of being bigoted, while his utterances show nothing but bigotry. Why does Cheezeit117 make those sorts of accusations, then? Well, if I knew that, I'd be in Stockholm picking up my prize and a sizable check.

I note in passing that Cheezeit117 has frequently been spotted making nicey-nice with uncompanionable nabobs of recidivism. Is this because he needs their help to make mountains out of molehills? To rephrase that question, what provoked him to ascribe opinions to me that I don't even hold? Well, once you begin to see the light, you'll realize that I try never to argue with him, because it's clear he's not susceptible to reason. His thesis is that laws are meant to be broken. That's utterly mutinous, you say? Good; that means you're finally catching on. The next step is to observe that you should not ask, "What demons possessed Cheezeit117 to demonize my family and friends?", but rather, "Is he hoping that the readers of this letter won't see the weakness of his argument relative to mine?". The latter question is the better one to ask, because we must undeniably redefine in practical terms the immutable ideals that have guided us from the beginning. Does that sound extremist? Is it too frowzy for you? I'm sorry if it seems that way, but that's life.

Cheezeit117 doesn't want to acknowledge that his henchmen can be stereotyped as crude tools of prepackaged political ideology and belligerent soi-disant do-gooders to boot. In fact, Cheezeit117 would rather block all discussion on the subject. I suppose that's because perhaps one day we will live in a world where good people are not troubled by fear of damnable, directionless rotters. Until that day arrives, however, we must spread the word that given the amount of misinformation that Cheezeit117 is circulating, I must truly point out that the biggest difference between me and Cheezeit117 is that Cheezeit117 wants to provide financial support to backwards banana republics and their insensate dictators. I, on the other hand, want to strengthen our roots so we can weather the storms that threaten our foundation. As we organize our campaigns against wishy-washy big-labor bosses and formulate responses to their rhetoric, it is critical that we defend with dedication and ferocity the very rights that Cheezeit117 so desperately wants to abolish. I've heard of humorless things like emotionalism and sectarianism. But I've also heard of things like nonviolence, higher moralities, and treating all beings as ends in and of themselves -- ideas which his ignorant, unthinking, mean-spirited brain is too small to understand. It saddens me that I shall not argue that his newsgroup postings are an authentic map of his plan to glorify the things that everyone else execrates. Read them and see for yourself. The impact of Cheezeit117's peremptory credos is exactly that predicted by the Book of Revelation. Evil will preside over the land. Injustice will triumph over justice, chaos over order, futility over purpose, superstition over reason, and lies over truth. Only when humanity experiences this Hell on Earth will it fully appreciate that Cheezeit117's criticisms of my letters have never successfully disproved a single fact I ever presented. Instead, his criticisms are based solely on his emotions and gut reactions. Well, I refuse to get caught up in Cheezeit117's "I think … I believe … I feel" game. In closing, I consider this letter to be required reading for everyone who still cares that King Cheezeit117 uses the word "literally" when he means "metaphorically". Unfortunately, with our nation's media being as controlled as it is, there's no way that this letter will be widely publicized. Therefore, I'm counting on you to pass on this letter to all of your e-mail contacts. Thank you.

[Krazzee]

I give you a smiley. . 'Nuff said.

[DJ Zodiac]

May I be cynical for a bit? I hope you don't mind, but with Blizzard's latest barrage of illiterate, distasteful bromides, I can't resist the urge to make a few cynical comments. Let's review the errors in Blizzard's statements in order. First, our pain is Blizzard's ecstasy. Blizzard wants nothing less than to lay the foundation for some serious mischief, hence its repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of its contumelious grievances.

This much is clear: The trouble with such asinine quacks is that they intend to contaminate clear thinking with Blizzard's illaudable dissertations. That's self-evident, and even Blizzard would probably agree with me on that. Even so, its occasional demonstrations of benevolence are not genuine. Nor are Blizzard's promises. In fact, it maintains a "Big Brother" dossier of incriminating information about everyone it distrusts, to use as a potential weapon. Is your name listed in that dossier? The answer is not obvious, because the gloss that its thralls put on its editorials unfortunately does little to act honorably. In the past, I've said that Blizzard's slurs are nothing shy of a slap in the face to all those who have fought and fallen in war for this country. Were I to make such a generalization today, it would contain a few "weasel words" -- an escape hatch or that indispensable cliche that conformism is an exclusive, rather than an inclusive, societal force. But because Blizzard is up to no good, I am not ready to retract my conviction or to recant error. Blizzard's sermons share a number of characteristics. They judge people based solely on hearsay. They promote mediocrity over merit. And they brand me as disloyal. Put together, these characteristics imply that by refusing to act, by refusing to weaken the critical links in Blizzard's nexus of nit-picky interventionism, we are giving Blizzard the power to promote the nutty stratagems of neurotic boors.

It's time for Blizzard to grow up. No wonder that Blizzard has taken it upon itself to condemn innocent people to death. So don't feed me any phony baloney about how censorship could benefit us. That's just not true. Any claim to the contrary is patently false. This applies first and foremost to a coterie under whose pudibund brand of isolationism the whole of honest humanity is suffering: Blizzard's army of offensive imbeciles. If Blizzard had done its homework, it'd know that to say that it is cunctipotent is mean-spirited nonsense and untrue to boot. Blizzard's lickspittles are not, technically, disgraceful, incoherent gaberlunzies, but rather nefarious, brazen ruffians. I insist that there is a small -- yet not entirely insignificant -- difference.

Blizzard's inclinations are based on prejudices and preconceived notions. Let me explain. Prudence is no vice. Cowardice -- especially Blizzard's crazy form of it -- is. Ask yourself: How can something that claims to be so educated and so open-minded dare to shrink the so-called marketplace of ideas down to convenience-store size? I bet you'll answer the same way that I did, because we both know that when Blizzard tells us that the Earth is flat, it somehow fails to mention that evil individuals are acting in concert with other evil individuals for an evil purpose. It fails to mention that in every country, there are ostentatious radicals who are every bit as deplorable as it. And it fails to mention that it decries or dismisses capitalism, technology, industrialization, and systems of government borne of Enlightenment ideas about the dignity and freedom of human beings. These are the things that Blizzard fears, because they are wedded to individual initiative and responsibility.

The fact is, Blizzard is terrified that there might be an absolute reality outside itself, a reality that is what it is, regardless of its wishes, theories, hopes, daydreams, or decrees. Blizzard's projects are designed to make our country spiritually blind. And they're working; they're having the desired effect. I unquestionably hope that Blizzard's punishment fits its crime. But it doesn't stop there. Blizzard's grand plan is to court a soporific minority of the worst sorts of heartless control freaks there are. I'm sure Mao Tse Tung would approve. In any case, Blizzard claims that it has its moral compass in tact. I claim that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves, although I should add that I hate it when people get their facts thoroughly wrong. For instance, whenever I hear some corporate fat cat make noises about how skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius, I can't help but think that in a tacit concession of defeat, Blizzard is now openly calling for the abridgment of various freedoms to accomplish coercively what its besotted deeds have failed at.

By brainwashing its encomiasts with irreligionism, Blizzard makes them easy to lead, easy to program, and easy to enslave. Armed only with a white shirt, pocket protector, slide rule, thick glasses, and some other neat stuff, I have determined that I'm sure Blizzard wouldn't want me to eavesdrop on its secret meetings. So why does it want to pervert the course of justice? That's the big question. If you knew the answer to that then you'd also know why we should treat Blizzard's treasonous den of thieves for what it is, a careless, sophomoric group of oleaginous ogres. That concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that it keeps telling us that newspapers should report only on items it agrees with. Are we also supposed to believe that ageism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society? I didn't think so. When I look back I think, "We are nearing a synthesis of post-structuralism and sadism into an illiberal absolutism that will divert us from proclaiming what in our innermost conviction is absolutely necessary." Do you understand the implications of what I have been telling you? Are you awake? Then you probably realize that Blizzard uses big words like "ultraphotomicrograph" to make itself sound important. For that matter, benevolent Nature has equipped another puny creature, the skunk, with a means of making itself seem important, too. Although Blizzard's belief systems may reek like a skunk, Blizzard has been trying for some time to convince people that it is beer-guzzling to question its comments. Don't believe its hype! Blizzard has just been offering that line as a means to cure the evil of discrimination with more discrimination.

As Blizzard feels less and less need to conceal its generalizations, it makes increasingly open moves towards ruthless mysticism, by which I mean that everything I've said so far is by way of introduction to the key point I want to make in this letter. My key point is that it always demands instant gratification. That's all that is of concern to it; nothing else matters -- except maybe to waste hours and hours in fruitless conferences and meetings. I tell you this because Blizzard is absolutely determined to believe that this is the best of all possible worlds and that it is the best of all possible organizations, and it's not about to let facts or reason get in its way. Blizzard's statements such as "Courtesy and manners don't count for anything" indicate that we're not all looking at the same set of facts. Fortunately, these facts are easily verifiable with a trip to the library by any open and honest individual. When I first heard about Blizzard's hastily mounted campaigns, I didn't know whether to laugh, because Blizzard's notions are so fickle, or cry, because I want to make this clear, so that those who do not understand deeper messages embedded within sarcastic irony -- and you know who I'm referring to -- can process my point.

Blizzard is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that it gives me the heebie-jeebies. At the risk of sounding a tad redundant, let me add that knowledge is the key that unlocks the shackles of bondage. That's why it's important for you to know that if we look beyond Blizzard's delusions of grandeur, we see that by comparing today to even ten years ago and projecting the course we're on, I'd say we're in for an even more belligerent, loud, and batty society, all thanks to Blizzard's agendas. To what consequences this leads can be seen from a few simple considerations. First of all, it's not the boogeyman that our children need to worry about. It's Blizzard. Not only is Blizzard more self-satisfied and more foul than any envisaged boogeyman or bugbear, but the main dissensus between me and Blizzard is that I aver that I feel it is incumbent upon me to enable adversaries to meet each other and establish direct personal bonds which contradict the stereotypes they rely upon to power their obstinate perceptions. It, on the other hand, contends that the sun rises just for it. Something that I have heard repeated several times from various sources -- a sort of "tag line" for Blizzard -- is, "We should go out and open the floodgates of heathenism. And when we're done with that, we'll all conceal information and, occasionally, blatantly lie." This is not a direct quote, nor have I heard it from Blizzard's lips directly, but several sources have paraphrased the content to me in near-enough ways that I feel fairly confident it actually was said. And to be honest, I have no trouble believing it.

Blizzard would feel an intense schadenfreude if its effusions made me abandon all hope. It will almost certainly tiptoe around that glaringly evident fact, because if it didn't, you might come to realize that when it comes to its statements, I assert that we have drifted along for too long in a state of blissful denial and outright complacency. It's time to provide a trenchant analysis of Blizzard's wisecracks. The sooner we do that, the better, because its premise (that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones) is its morality disguised as pretended neutrality. Blizzard uses this disguised morality to support its hariolations, thereby making its argument self-refuting. I have begged Blizzard's vicegerents to step forth and spread awareness of the primitive nature of Blizzard's prank phone calls. To date, not a single soul has agreed to help in this fashion. Are they worried about how Blizzard might retaliate? If I'm not mistaken, there's a painfully simple answer. It regards the way that Blizzard has written volumes about how it can change its rummy ways. Don't believe a word of it, though. The truth is that it accuses me of being pea-brained whenever I state that its treatment of oligarchism mirrors the attitude that many superstitious airheads hold towards revisionism. Alright, I'll admit that I have a sharp tongue and sometimes write with a bit of a poison pen but the fact remains that I am not trying to save the world -- I gave up that pursuit a long time ago. But I am trying to make this world a better place in which to live. Blizzard's comrades have learned their scripts well and the rhetoric comes gushing forth with little provocation. Blizzard hates you -- yes, you, because you, like me, want to contribute to the intellectual and spiritual health of the body politic.

If Blizzard is going to make an emotional appeal, then it should also include a rational argument. Blizzard's cohorts all have serious personal problems. In fact, the way it keeps them loyal to it is by encouraging and exacerbating these problems rather than by helping to overcome them. I could accuse Blizzard of using puerile, acrimonious doofuses to get its way, but I wouldn't stoop to that level. Blizzard has planted its myrmidons everywhere. You can find them in businesses, unions, activist organizations, tax-exempt foundations, professional societies, movies, schools, churches, and so on. Not only does this subversive approach enhance Blizzard's ability to make conditions far worse than could ever have been the case without its effete efforts but it also provides irrefutable evidence that it is addicted to the feeling of power, to the idea of controlling people. Sadly, it has no real concern for the welfare or the destiny of the people it desires to lead. Anyway, I hope I've made my point, which is that Blizzard simply wants to win at all costs the war against our individualism and our liberties.


Lol. Blizzard I picked they are annoying sometimes.

[dave_maltby]

LOL! I just used this to write a complaint about a collegue (who I was putting a complaint in about anyway) but I thought this wouls spice things up a bit, we'll see what comes back!

I know this topic has been beaten to death lately, but something needs to be said. Mr. Tony Dougan is a wee bit overzealous in his defense of nonrepresentationalism. To begin with, my dream is for tired eyes to open and see clearly, broken spirits to find new energy, and weary arms to find the strength to begin the debate about Tony's bruta fulmina. He likes to cite poll results that "prove" that the sky is falling. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that Tony thinks that it is his moral imperative to sanctify his depravity. Of course, thinking so doesn't make it so. At the risk of belaboring the obvious, I normally prefer to listen than to speak. I would, however, like to remind Tony that my purpose here is not to express our concerns about his militant, inarticulate harangues. Well, okay, it is. But I should point out that he complains a lot. What's ironic, though, is that he hasn't made even a single concrete suggestion for improvement or identified a single problem with the system as it exists today.
To tolerate Tony's incontinent ravings simply because they're not packaged and sold as simple-minded is to hasten the destruction of our civilization. As a matter of policy, malign, *******-out jackanapes should not vilify our history, character, values, and traditions, but this has never stopped Tony. According to his distortions, distractions, and outright deceptions, superstition is no less credible than proven scientific principles. Fortunately, most of the people who are seriously interested in preserving our civilization know that the reality is that Tony's perversions cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that Tony's activities are on the up-and-up. In closing this letter, let me point out that I would be remiss if I didn't remind you that imperious Machiavellians simply pass through this world sowing the seeds of evil

Signed



Mr D G Maltby

[~Jagris]

At first i thought this would be something else lol well here it is



When I used to hear about illiterate students graduating from school, I often wondered how that was possible. But after encountering some of William C. Formen, Jr.'s more flighty circulars, I now realize that not only is it possible for people to graduate without having learned fundamental skills such as reading and writing, but that it's possible for these same people to believe that William has a "special" perspective on teetotalism which carries with it a "special" right to make widespread accusations and insinuations without having the facts to back them up. There are a number of reasons he isn't telling us as to why he wants to mollycoddle the most gin-swilling degenerates you'll ever see. In this letter, I will expose those reasons one-by-one, on the principle that creating needed understanding is best achieved in a calm, rational environment. But it goes further than that; he always demands instant gratification. That's all that is of concern to him; nothing else matters -- except maybe to open the gates of Hell. I tell you this because we should agree on definitions before saying anything further about William's loud pleas. For starters, let's say that "revanchism" is "that which makes William yearn to increase people's stress and aggression." Although this has been overlooked or ignored by the established scientific community, inasmuch as I disagree with William's accusations and find his ad hominem attacks offensive, I am happy to meet William's speech with more speech and, if necessary, continue this discussion until the truth shines. Here's the heart of the matter: William cannot tolerate the world as it is. He needs to live in a world of fantasies. To be more specific, if I want to serve as a human shield for William's bombardments, that should be my prerogative. I don't need William forcing me to. Although I can no more change the past than see the future, it's safe to say that I have reason to believe that he is about to impose exploitative new restrictions on society just to satisfy some sort of cantankerous drive for power. I pray that I'm wrong, of course, because the outcome could be devastating. Nevertheless, the indications are there that William is not interested in what is true and what is false or in what is good and what is evil. In fact, those distinctions have no meaning to him whatsoever. The only thing that has any meaning to William is Lysenkoism. Why? First, I'll give you a very brief answer and then I'll go back and explain my answer in detail. As for the brief answer, this makes me fearful that I might someday find myself in the crosshairs of William's nutty, ridiculous morals. (To be honest, though, it wouldn't be the first time.) I am sick of our illustrious "leaders" treading on eggshells so as not to upset William. Here's what I have to say to them: Some people maintain that I've received appreciative notes from academic psychologists and students of culture who deplore the misapplication of their subjects by ideologues like William. Others assert that William's idea of a good time is to subject us to the vainglorious, cheeky yapping of unprincipled scofflaws. In the interest of clearing up the confusion, I'll make the following observation: William's apple-polishers get a thrill out of protesting. They have no idea what causes they're fighting for or against. For them, going down to the local protest, carrying a sign, hanging out with William, and meeting some other annoying, unbalanced mattoids is merely a social event. They're not even aware that William's inclinations always follow the same pattern. He puts the desired twist on the actual facts, ignores inconvenient facts, and invents as many new "facts" as necessary to convince us that human life is expendable.
The worst sorts of stubborn, uninformed parasites there are generally feel that William has no intention to lead people towards iniquity and sin, but William's often-quoted politics belie this notion. There can be no doubt that he insists that he has his moral compass in tact. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, would never take a job working for him. Given his pestiferous, uneducated protests, who would want to? I could go on for pages listing innumerable examples of William's ultra-insecure ethics and dirty disquisitions. I have already written enough, surely, to convince you that if I wanted to brainwash and manipulate a large segment of the population, I would convince them that "the norm" shouldn't have to worry about how the exceptions feel. In fact, that's exactly what William does as part of his quest to deliver an additional blow to dignity and self-worth.
I see how important William's self-serving, pusillanimous pronouncements are to his helpers and I laugh. I laugh because if we contradict him, we are labelled supercilious lackwits. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms. Okay, I admit that it's amazing how low William will stoop to introduce disease, ignorance, squalor, idleness, and want into affluent neighborhoods. But if you've read this far, then you probably either agree with me or are on the way to agreeing with me.
Certainly, William does not tolerate any view that differs from his own. Rather, he discredits and discards those people who contradict him along with the ideas that they represent. We will have to become much more vigilant to ensure that he doesn't biologically or psychologically engineer aberrant, clueless cadgers to make them even more eccentric than they already are. He is the spawn of Satan. Okay, that's a bit of an overstatement, but for all of you reading this who are not raucous, obdurate crybabies, you can understand where the motivation for that statement comes from. We have a right and an obligation to speak out against behavior and speech that is intended to depressurize the frail vessel of human hopes, but I won't linger on that. I guess that my take on this is that William spouts a lot of numbers whenever he wants to make a point. He then subjectively interprets those numbers to support his rantings while ignoring the fact that no matter what else we do, our first move must be to educate everyone about how I, speaking as someone who is not a disruptive wisenheimer, surely suspect that my theatrics regarding petulant spouters, while far from complete, will empower the oppressed to control their own lives. That's the first step: education. Education alone is not enough, of course. We must also make technical preparations for the achievement of freedom and human independence. Help me turn random, senseless violence into meaningful action. Join your hands with mine in this, the greatest cause of our time