this:
? 1-10 pls
this:
? 1-10 pls
Amazing, but you need to change the text/work on it.
EDIT: My rating is about 9/10
THIS SIGNATURE IS IN VIALOATION OF SITE RULES, PLEASE FIX ME!
-Fault
I feel like I've seen it before...
I hate the text >.< Sorry. And I don't like the white border. Sig looks cool though besides those. 8/10
Here, other Text, other Border. But why you got banned Krusader?
![]()
Uh, another thing XD
![]()
lol Kinda Sketch on the Star Wars thing, but the Killzone sig is not that great.
I don't like the Star Wars thingy >.<
i dont normally 1-10 it but as you asked i'd give a 6.5/10. mainly because the text ruins the sig, but regardless of that the sig feels too messy and lacks any real depth. youre render appears flat and blends into the background to much on both sides removing any possilibty of depth between the two.
the render has a dark patch to its right but the background also has a very dark patch on the left, this provides contrasting lighting which confuses you as to where the light source is.
the other main problem with the sig is it has no focal point. there needs to be area of the sig that draws you're eye into and there just isn't one because the colours are so mono tonal the whole sig feels on the same level.
i like how youve used the grungy splatter brushes to give a dark dirty feel to it, howver you have done this too much and need to be more refined with your usage so that it highlights specific areas within the sig, not the whole sig.
Last edited by CarlosJ; 10-05-2008 at 01:54 PM.
Love isn't an emotion or an instinct - it is an Art
yes but are a good focal point but they aren't a significant focal point within the sig to create flow to the rest of it. they are quite small and as they become the focal point it detracts from the detail of the mask and makes it indistinguishable when you look at it without close inspection. once the viewers eye is drawn into this focal point it doesn't disperse to other parts of the sig because of the contrasting colours and blending effects just draw you into the eyes and keep you're attention there.
you should almost always add a light source, in this the eyes could be the light souce but regardless as the render/stock you choose has lighting on the left of it already you either needed to darken the lighting to remove it or follow the lighting "trend" throughout the rest of the sig. not contradict the lightingting which creates confusing depth patterns.
not sure why you wanted it so blended into the background though, in parts it works yes, but for the whole sig it ruins the flow and ends up removing any flow you would have had throughout the sig. the brushing/smudging effects work in little amounts but you have positioned it on both the top and bottom of the sig, you should have limited this to the focus of the render so the render blended into the background without the whole sig feeling blended into itself.
Last edited by CarlosJ; 10-05-2008 at 05:01 PM. Reason: typo
Love isn't an emotion or an instinct - it is an Art
Well it seems as tho the lighting is coming from the left side as you can see the left side is more lit up then the right side and the right side has shadows as much as i can see from this sig... And yes as soon as I looked at the signature i saw the orange eyes but on the first attempt that was a horrible text attempt and the second attempt is much better
Call me zak
7/10 good job keep up the work =]
Pals 4 Life