No C4D (i forgot to add it):
C4D:
CC plz? i think i did well, but thats my opinion. i wanna hear ur guys'![]()
![]()
No C4D (i forgot to add it):
C4D:
CC plz? i think i did well, but thats my opinion. i wanna hear ur guys'![]()
![]()
Last edited by .Cyong; 09-13-2008 at 05:47 PM.
looks pretty coolis that render supposed to be a wolf or something?
lol its gambit from xmen =P
Looks good, should put a different C4D in there though.
THIS SIGNATURE IS IN VIALOATION OF SITE RULES, PLEASE FIX ME!
-Fault
rofl .cyong, i never knew you changed your name.... fiddyx
lol yeup =P
and ty Mjc111, yeah i thought the C4D looked kinda out of place. thats why i didnt overwrite the original one.
Hmm I like it, took me a while to actually see the render though, it's too uhh "squished" -__- not a good choice of word there but meh..
Mjc111 is right though, the c4d doesn't look right, out of place almost...
Anyway good job I give it 9/10
The text looks great in the sig i must say. And as aisha said the render looks squished but. i think it ended up helping out the sig more than not. Most will probably not agree but when i first saw the sig i did not know what the render was because i focussed on the signature before you post on what it was. but anyways it looks really well if you dont know what or who you are looking at and it could just be as a super kickass background. Also the c4d edit in the first post. looks again i will use aishas words. out of place. it just doesnt fit with the signature. so after all that criticism i will give it a.... 8.5/10
ty guys =D