-
WHAT ? Banwave already !?!?!?
Damn, that's hard for buddy bots. Blizzard is at war.
You guys are finished. :'(
I was using HB since day 1 on WoW years ago, but now you took too much space, you're public ennemy.
Last edited by eKqN; 06-02-2016 at 05:54 AM.
Hackhac, contributor && donator.
-
Member
I Called it on Page one, easy bans inc ^^
-
Mass bans within a week. It's amazing you guys still have customers these days.
-
Member
Originally Posted by
Maper
Mass bans within a week. It's amazing you guys still have customers these days.
You're retarded if you think the banwave could have been avoided and it's somehow their fault.
-
Member
Originally Posted by
Jaladhjin
People who realize what cheating in games is..
The eventual likely loss of the accounts you cheat on..
Everybody says yeah yeah blah blah don't cheat on accounts you don't want to lose blah blah blah but c'mon.. seriously.. c'mon.. we all do that..
No.. no we don't.. it's not just some bs rhetoric.. it's the most valid statement in the cheating community.
Not only do you lose your account, your HWID gets flagged. Hope all you people paying for rushed out hacks with no detection prevention whatsoever have learned this lesson now that everyone is banned.
-
Originally Posted by
amazingxx
You're retarded if you think the banwave could have been avoided and it's somehow their fault.
Pushing out a paid product when they have no idea how the anti-cheat actually works is their fault.
Pushing out a paid product with incompetent anti-detection is their fault.
Mass, cross-site advertising for their new paid product is their fault.
:confused:
-
People bought the product knowing the risk. It is a brand new game, and supposedly the detection was turned off initially (when they released the product), enabled, then disabled again. Kinda hard to prevent and test detection against something that is completely new and unknown.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Thanks
-
Member
I lol'd but all seriousness I think Bossland should stay away from hacks.... With HB banwaves happening I doubt they can avoid any detection at this point.
GG
-
Originally Posted by
Sychotix
Kinda hard to prevent and test detection against something that is completely new and unknown.
They could easily make public, free hacks first to bait the developers into using the anti-cheat, before they start taking peoples' money.
-
Contributor
I'd suggest waiting for artificial aiming to make a hack for overwatch
-
Member
Originally Posted by
Valmere
I'd suggest waiting for artificial aiming to make a hack for overwatch
They (and other large hack subscription sites) have gone on the record saying they will never support Overwatch because of Blizzard's tendency to get lawyers involved.
-
Member
I encourage aimbot development so people with Parkinson and other mental or motor ailment can get a chance at playing Overwatch.
-
Originally Posted by
Deminish
I encourage aimbot development so people with Parkinson and other mental or motor ailment can get a chance at playing Overwatch.
That is a pretty poor excuse. If anyone needs an aimbot to play an FPS, they are doing it wrong. There isn't much game left to play if it aims automatically for you. If that person needs aimbots to enjoy an FPS, I'd recommend playing a single player shooter where they won't be ruining the match for 11 other people.
-
Originally Posted by
Sychotix
That is a pretty poor excuse. If anyone needs an aimbot to play an FPS, they are doing it wrong. There isn't much game left to play if it aims automatically for you. If that person needs aimbots to enjoy an FPS, I'd recommend playing a single player shooter where they won't be ruining the match for 11 other people.
I'm not sure I would say that having a disease which literally prevents you from aiming is a poor excuse, necessarily.
-
Originally Posted by
Maper
I'm not sure I would say that having a disease which literally prevents you from aiming is a poor excuse, necessarily.
It is a poor excuse to "encourage aimbot development." If it is preventing you from aiming, it is probably preventing you from moving your character. Should we just make a bot that will move for the player too? I have no issue with accommodating people with disabilities, but you are creating a solution to a problem that doesn't exist. You know damn well that the target audience for an aimbot isn't the handful of people with disabilities preventing them from aiming.