Possible Broken Auction House

[Elaborate]

Diablo 3 Broken Auction House - YouTube

not too sure if the video is fake though.

Description from the video;

"Don't know what Blizzard is doing or if they are even aware. 1st and 4th purchases were $1....while the second is $0.68 and the third is $1.32"

[Assistend]

Seems to hard to look at the auction log where it states the correct number for every single transaction.

[aminios]

It a real video, actually they used average last 10 trades price instead of the actual price. Same goes to Gold AH, when you buy something, eventually you will get refund from the different

[Gramexer]

Don't know, in transaction list it shows as 1$ per 400k and he spent the the correct amount for 1,6m (4$) after all. Don't know if his bnet balance would have been correct, if he would refreshed his battle.net balance (the button on top)

Maybe his battle.net balance updated little bit too early (Like before system bought 4x100k) and when he bought third time, it updated to correct amount, who knows :f

[Assistend]

It a real video, actually they used average last 10 trades price instead of the actual price. Same goes to Gold AH, when you buy something, eventually you will get refund from the different

The displayed price is a anti lag price that was implemented to fix the stability issues they had the first weeks - (dont call it "actual price") - ensuring that no matter the current transactions ongoing, you will get them for that price, hence the displayed price is above the actual market price.
You will however only ever have to pay the actual price, which most often is reflected in the "last 10 trades".

Don't know, in transaction list it shows as 1$ per 400k and he spent the the correct amount for 1,6m (4$) after all. Don't know if his bnet balance would have been correct, if he would refreshed his battle.net balance (the button on top)

Maybe his battle.net balance updated little bit too early (Like before system bought 4x100k) and when he bought third time, it updated to correct amount, who knows :f

Yes, it first substracted the listed price, and before it was able to updated to "refund" the diffrence he bought again resulting in the imaginary cheaper