Disclaimer: I haven't tested this specific farm.
However in general, here's how this works. Guy finds interesting farm. The information is kinda useful. He wants to share it.
Now the problem is this: if you put "Decent, interesting gold farm" in the title, then it will not interest any one. They might be interested if they looked at it, but they won't actually do that.
You've essentially wasted your time composing a post/article/blog etc.
So the temptation is to put "Mega-fantastic-awesome gold farm 10000000000 gold per hour". Then tons of people will look at it but a lot of them won't be very happy you exaggerated.
You will actually get more rep, followers etc following this strategy but you do get a ton of shit thrown at you in the process.
What a lot of people do is try and find a middling strategy where you technically aren't being deceptive but you know people will misread it, so "100000000 gold per LIV", LIV=looted item
value, but no one really knows that so it is equivalent to the second strategy.
I don't really sensationalize gold farms with contrived stupid numbers much any more, but I don't need to - my name gets a reasonable amount of attention by itself. For someone struggling
to build rep on ownedcore or a channel on youtube or a twitch presence it is much more tempting. What people don't generally consider (perhaps understandably) is that it is the audience
that feeds the hype-the best way to combat it is by supporting the use of more accurate labeling. To some extent this has happened with gold farms on retail-no one uses clickbait much
nowadays because it just doesn't work any more.
For this reason I would basically just ignore the numbers in a post like this and just concentrate on any value in the play (and the farms ARE usually interesting). For gold per hour you should
only ever use your own results as a guide.
BTW I've tested like a hundred farms I've seen people post since classic came out and they are ALL sodding 12G per hour or less.