Save More Than 9 Decks with This Script...

[ArBar]

So it's clear blizzard isn't listening to the demand for more deck slots so I forced my buddy Conor to write a script as a workaround. This will let you save and load decks from .txt files as well as load saved decks direct from sites like hearthstats.net and hearthpwn.com so essentially you can save unlimited decks and swap them out super fast.



Stuff Needed:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/hearthstonedeckintext/
AutoHotkey: macro and automation Windows scripting language

Sites Mentioned:
HearthStats | Hearthstone Statistics and Tracking
HearthPwn - Hearthstone Database, Deck Builder, News, and more!

[Iaccidentallytwink]

You can use Deck Tracker for this and it works far better.

[ArBar]

You can use Deck Tracker for this and it works far better.

That also tracks what cards u have left in your deck and gets into a sketchy grey area on the terms of service I don't want to risk getting banned down the line if they decide to go after people using it. But that is for sure a more powerful program you are right.

[Iaccidentallytwink]

That also tracks what cards u have left in your deck and gets into a sketchy grey area on the terms of service I don't want to risk getting banned down the line if they decide to go after people using it. But that is for sure a more powerful program you are right.

Negatory .

[mansemino]

Negatory .

It's not an answer for what ArBar said. The fact that Mihai Cornean menctioned HS Tracker on his twit doesn't mean Ben granted it as an allowed tool (there are other tools with same name and very different behaviour and operating). Because, in fact, "this" HS Tracker insides and features ride the thin line where TOS can be broken.

Btw, Blizz takes into account user experience and fair play, so they won't be so tolerant with other features than deck storing/retrieving, which "this" HS Tracker provides, and it's the reason why it's so "useful" for many people...

[Cazki]

As long as it reads from the log file and has nothing to do with memory reading, tcp sniffing or anything such, then it's fine.

Have a look here

[mansemino]

As long as it reads from the log file and has nothing to do with memory reading, tcp sniffing or anything such, then it's fine.

Have a look here

While they not explicitly allow a 'named' tool (i.e. they say explicit names), it's not. Log mode is disabled by default, so by doing the trick you are breaching TOS (ap.2 paragraphs 1, 6 and 7, and ap.12 paragraph 3). There are deck trackers were you click every card you draw (no automation) and they don't use logging, which is the nearest way to paper/pen use. I'm sure they mean this kind of trackers. Not to mention the advantage against users that don't use it, which Blizz cares so much (the so called 'user experience').

[Iaccidentallytwink]

While they not explicitly allow a 'named' tool (i.e. they say explicit names), it's not. Log mode is disabled by default, so by doing the trick you are breaching TOS (ap.2 paragraphs 1, 6 and 7, and ap.12 paragraph 3). There are deck trackers were you click every card you draw (no automation) and they don't use logging, which is the nearest way to paper/pen use. I'm sure they mean this kind of trackers. Not to mention the advantage against users that don't use it, which Blizz cares so much (the so called 'user experience').

I suppose next you're going to tell me that commandline arguments for Blizzard games are breaking ToS?