Memory patch is up, RIP D3 menu

User Tag List

Page 11 of 13 FirstFirst ... 78910111213 LastLast
Results 151 to 165 of 194
  1. #151
    notnairda's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    6
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    16
    Thanks G/R
    4/5
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by maper View Post
    I think the confusion here is that you are assuming it will be decrypted in-place, which it is not. The decryption takes place in a temporary stack variable, so you either have to hook the point in the game code (therefore making memory modifications) where the decrypted value will be used in order to reliably use that stack variable, or you have to decrypt the value yourself when you read it.
    "so you either have to hook the point in the game code".
    THud is an external "cheat". No .exe detouring. Pretty sure it isn't internal because it works only in windowed/fullscreen-windowed mode, so I assumed it's using just some direct3d hook or something, instead of injecting directly to the game. Otherwise I don't see a reason why it would only work in windowed modes.
    Can't tell for granted, because the code is not open source (sic!). Pure guess.

    "or you have to decrypt the value yourself when you read it."
    It's decrypted by the game itself at some point. Hence you're able to grab a string. If it got never decrypted by the game, the game would crash. There MUST be at least 1 tick where it's decrypted and you're able to grab it. Otherwise it's a crash. I've seen similar approach (if not the same) in NFS Payback.
    Last edited by notnairda; 03-09-2018 at 06:53 AM.

    Memory patch is up, RIP D3
  2. #152
    Rlyeh's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    1
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    14
    Thanks G/R
    0/0
    Trade Feedback
    1 (100%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by notnairda View Post
    "so you either have to hook the point in the game code".
    THud is an external "cheat". No .exe detouring. Pretty sure it isn't internal because it works only in windowed/fullscreen-windowed mode, so I assumed it's using just some direct3d hook or something, instead of injecting directly to the game. Otherwise I don't see a reason why it would only work in windowed modes.
    Can't tell for granted, because the code is not open source (sic!). Pure guess.

    "or you have to decrypt the value yourself when you read it."
    It's decrypted by the game itself at some point. Hence you're able to grab a string. If it got never decrypted by the game, the game would crash. There MUST be at least 1 tick where it's decrypted and you're able to grab it. Otherwise it's a crash. I've seen similar approach (if not the same) in NFS Payback.
    Windowed/full screen windowed mode is necessary for THUD to be able to draw the overlay. It's impossible to do it in full screen mode.

  3. #153
    notnairda's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    6
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    16
    Thanks G/R
    4/5
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by Rlyeh View Post
    Windowed/full screen windowed mode is necessary for THUD to be able to draw the overlay. It's impossible to do it in full screen mode.
    Yeah. Exactly what I said. It would have to be an internal cheat to draw it fullscreen :-)
    Last edited by notnairda; 03-09-2018 at 08:34 AM.

  4. #154
    maper's Avatar Elite User __readgsqword(0x188); CoreCoins Purchaser
    Reputation
    496
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    356
    Thanks G/R
    26/353
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by notnairda View Post
    "or you have to decrypt the value yourself when you read it."
    It's decrypted by the game itself at some point. Hence you're able to grab a string. If it got never decrypted by the game, the game would crash. There MUST be at least 1 tick where it's decrypted and you're able to grab it. Otherwise it's a crash. I've seen similar approach (if not the same) in NFS Payback.
    I know it seems like I am nagging at this point but I promise I am not trying to be argumentative. I totally understand where your head is at with your assumption. You're saying that the value will be decrypted at some point, even for a fraction of a second, and you'll be able to read it.

    You would be right except for the fact that that's not how they have implemented it. They do not decrypt the value in-place and then read it, even for just one tick. What happens is when the value is going to be decrypted, a local copy of the value is made on the stack, and the decryption is performed on that copy. The original value is never decrypted. Only copies are decrypted. Because of the ephemeral nature of data on the stack of any given thread, it is infeasible to know exactly where and when the decrypted value will appear.

    The only reasonable solutions to this are to either hook the function(s) that will use the decrypted value, which as you mentioned is not an option for an external cheat, or to reverse engineer and understand the encryption algorithm enough that you understand how to decrypt the value yourself when you read it.

  5. Thanks enigma32, Xewl, notnairda, johnbl, h42 (5 members gave Thanks to maper for this useful post)
  6. #155
    notnairda's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    6
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    16
    Thanks G/R
    4/5
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by maper View Post
    I know it seems like I am nagging at this point but I promise I am not trying to be argumentative. I totally understand where your head is at with your assumption. You're saying that the value will be decrypted at some point, even for a fraction of a second, and you'll be able to read it.

    You would be right except for the fact that that's not how they have implemented it. They do not decrypt the value in-place and then read it, even for just one tick. What happens is when the value is going to be decrypted, a local copy of the value is made on the stack, and the decryption is performed on that copy. The original value is never decrypted. Only copies are decrypted. Because of the ephemeral nature of data on the stack of any given thread, it is infeasible to know exactly where and when the decrypted value will appear.

    The only reasonable solutions to this are to either hook the function(s) that will use the decrypted value, which as you mentioned is not an option for an external cheat, or to reverse engineer and understand the encryption algorithm enough that you understand how to decrypt the value yourself when you read it.
    Now. that's a quality post and no sarcasm here. Thanks alot. I'll keep that all in mind. Kinda looks the way it worked in NFS Payback. Will get back at ya once we finally lay our hands on it:>

  7. #156
    Gator T's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    4
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    7
    Thanks G/R
    0/3
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't know anything about coding or encryption really, but I'm really confused and hoping someone can help explain something to me. Enigma was already able to decrypt whatever protection Blizzard put into the minimap. Realistically, that minimap information is by far the biggest advantage any overlay can provide. Why would they bother encrypting other information to prevent that information from being read?

    I mean, do they really care about an overlay telling me how many crafting materials I have on my inventory tab? Do they really care about letting me see my total health/resource without scrolling my mouse over the orb? Do they really care about me seeing what level augment is on my gear without scrolling over it? If the map information can be so easily decrypted, why bother encrypting other information that really is just more quality of life than an actual advantage?

  8. Thanks blink3y, n1com, VitaKaninen (3 members gave Thanks to Gator T for this useful post)
  9. #157
    enigma32's Avatar Legendary
    Reputation
    912
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    551
    Thanks G/R
    4/738
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by Gator T View Post
    Enigma was already able to decrypt whatever protection Blizzard put into the minimap.
    Wrong. I'm not decrypting anything. The only reason I'm able to find things is because I know what they're supposed to look like in memory, the "shape" of it, and I know how to find (almost) all allocated chunks of memory. So I go through these and find the best match, and hope that it works It doesn't always and honestly I think this method will be broken in a few patches.

    If this was a new game, I would not attempt to reverse engineer it. Blizzard won. I believe this is a tech demo, rather than trying to target a specific hack or bot. As a tech demo, it is a success!

    However, if they were targeting a specific hack, well, then hacks are hacks. An overlay hack is not very different from a bot. They use the same information, but one has a pathing algorithm and mouse/keyboard interaction added. More information = more optimized, but the core is the same.

  10. Thanks Becksulinaa, d2k2, ADV2015, h42, johnbl (5 members gave Thanks to enigma32 for this useful post)
  11. #158
    Razzko's Avatar Active Member
    Reputation
    15
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    103
    Thanks G/R
    15/5
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by Gator T View Post
    I don't know anything about coding or encryption really, but I'm really confused and hoping someone can help explain something to me. Enigma was already able to decrypt whatever protection Blizzard put into the minimap. Realistically, that minimap information is by far the biggest advantage any overlay can provide. Why would they bother encrypting other information to prevent that information from being read?

    I mean, do they really care about an overlay telling me how many crafting materials I have on my inventory tab? Do they really care about letting me see my total health/resource without scrolling my mouse over the orb? Do they really care about me seeing what level augment is on my gear without scrolling over it? If the map information can be so easily decrypted, why bother encrypting other information that really is just more quality of life than an actual advantage?
    Because they just have an 'anti cheat technology' that they are implementing for all their games (see Overwatch and World of Warcraft, others will probably follow too). There's no reason for them to be selective about it, they're enabling it for entire games.

    Or, in other words, they'd have "to bother" to make it selective (i.e. only for the map in D3, for example), rather than just put a whole game onto that new tech. They'd have to do something very "out of their way" to NOT break THud.

    They didn't sit there and decide "yeah, we should totally encrypt stats". It was more like, "yeah, let's enable the anticheat in d3", and that hits everything at once.
    Last edited by Razzko; 03-13-2018 at 05:40 PM.

  12. #159
    Megouski's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    5
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    8
    Thanks G/R
    1/3
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Do you believe ROS-Bot is currently decrypting? Id like to hear what your thought on it are, do you believe they realistically have a beta running with what you know the limitations are ?

  13. #160
    odaru7788's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    3
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    108
    Thanks G/R
    45/2
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    rosbot says:Still running some beta rounds to finalize a release. It's getting closer

  14. #161
    xblade2k7's Avatar Active Member
    Reputation
    48
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    277
    Thanks G/R
    101/32
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    now using RosBot, you are banned 100% guaranted. They no show and proof nothing, no memory patch for checks... etc... all false and unsafe, ros bot is history.

  15. #162
    R3peat's Avatar Site Donator while(true) CoreCoins Purchaser
    Reputation
    190
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    424
    Thanks G/R
    0/132
    Trade Feedback
    68 (99%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by enigma32 View Post
    Wrong. I'm not decrypting anything. The only reason I'm able to find things is because I know what they're supposed to look like in memory, the "shape" of it, and I know how to find (almost) all allocated chunks of memory. So I go through these and find the best match, and hope that it works It doesn't always and honestly I think this method will be broken in a few patches.

    If this was a new game, I would not attempt to reverse engineer it. Blizzard won. I believe this is a tech demo, rather than trying to target a specific hack or bot. As a tech demo, it is a success!

    However, if they were targeting a specific hack, well, then hacks are hacks. An overlay hack is not very different from a bot. They use the same information, but one has a pathing algorithm and mouse/keyboard interaction added. More information = more optimized, but the core is the same.
    Makes sense. Amen

  16. #163
    Megouski's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    5
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    8
    Thanks G/R
    1/3
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally Posted by xblade2k7 View Post
    now using RosBot, you are banned 100% guaranted. They no show and proof nothing, no memory patch for checks... etc... all false and unsafe, ros bot is history.
    No one is using ROSBot except those in closed beta. None of that team has been banned. Please try not spew bullshit based on self admittid zero information, sit down, and shut the fuck up. You're not helping the scene. Thanks.

    PS. Its spelled guaranteed.

  17. Thanks JackCeparou, johnbl (2 members gave Thanks to Megouski for this useful post)
  18. #164
    Ramon125's Avatar Member CoreCoins Purchaser
    Reputation
    1
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    32
    Thanks G/R
    9/0
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Do you truly think that blizz will ban ROS beta testers?? lol

    I believe that blizz has prepared some hooks/traps to catch bot users in more reliable way.

    RoSbot dev knows about it but they are still trying to figure out how bypass them.

  19. #165
    kanilol's Avatar Member
    Reputation
    2
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    5
    Thanks G/R
    0/1
    Trade Feedback
    0 (0%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    God I hope Rosbot is never back, this is one of the best seasons ever.

  20. Thanks Lagertha (1 members gave Thanks to kanilol for this useful post)
Page 11 of 13 FirstFirst ... 78910111213 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. WTF Is Up With WoW!?
    By Krunkage in forum World of Warcraft General
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-27-2008, 03:04 PM
  2. Infinate Misdirect while buff is up
    By Zukini in forum World of Warcraft Exploits
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-11-2008, 12:13 PM
  3. <MMOwned> Is Up!!
    By Amedis in forum World of Warcraft General
    Replies: 110
    Last Post: 07-02-2007, 02:22 AM
  4. What is up with Flashchat?
    By Holysymbol in forum World of Warcraft General
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-15-2007, 03:10 PM
  5. Omg My Site Is Up!!!!!!!!!!!
    By dumbledrew in forum Community Chat
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-21-2006, 06:45 PM
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 PM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Digital Point modules: Sphinx-based search