[No Memory Write] LUA UnLocker & Anti AFK

[MrBrain1]

read it somewhere in a forum.

/edit: i looked for it, but i can't find it.
if i remember correctly, there was a screenshotted chat image in which DL said, he got a letter from blizzard lawyers.

[Monkzetta]

So, is better dont use this?

[Arkanid]

read it somewhere in a forum.

/edit: i looked for it, but i can't find it.
if i remember correctly, there was a screenshotted chat image in which DL said, he got a letter from blizzard lawyers.

Lawyers? LOL This gave me a good chuckle.

[Lightbrand]

It's always better to not use it. If you use it you're at a risk.
Now is that a risk you're willing to take in exchange for the advantage of unprotected LUA functions?

What we have here does not have any warden protection, but it also doesn't inject. Warden (right now to my and to DL's knowledge) is only allowed to scan within the game's memory (if it's allowed to look outside the process, for example if it's able to look at your task manager, then all the honorbuddy bots out there will receive a ban, but they aren't) due to legal/privacy issue.

What does that mean? I would say this method should remain safe for as long as Warden is in its current state, if Warden expands honorbuddy will be the first to fall before this. But whether it will continue to unlock without update from (ours truly) DarkLinux...Apparently it still does for 6.1 and so does his flyhack.

As to whether Blizzard will specifically upgrade Warden to check for hardware breakpoints...

[dan001]

Are there resources to learn out hardware breakpoints? Since the exploit remains out of process and does not edit the memory, this would be nice know how.

[DarkLinux]

Oh shit I should go check my mailbox. Good thing it still works

[Lightbrand]

Are you going to jail soon DarkLinux =)

[DarkLinux]

I hope not lols

[Monkzetta]

So, we'll have updates? ^_^

[Bajawah]

My question in terms of detection is whether Bliz has the ability to know :

1 - What macros you have saved. Seeing your unlocked macros would be a big "hey look at me".

2 - If you are running LUA that shouldn't be able to be executed but is via an unlocker.

Warden aside, those two have always been my two main concerns.

Also, true or false, Warden resides in the Bliz launcher and can be avoided if you start wow.exe directly. Unsure if that is true, I'm assuming not.

[StinkyTwitch]

DarkLinux any chance you'd ever add Object Management features?

[ev0]

Works like a charm, goes hand&hand with guild recruiting.

[dan001]

I believe blizzard does scan player's game logs because they often review chat. Just look at this quote from a owned core thread, " ([2014/01/22 PQR Banwave] Yet another investigation of what has triggered it)but it can definitely detect PQI use (since it posts to chat channel)". Does that answer your first question?

[Shark5060]

Well PE doesn't post in the chat channel - the only output (which you can see in the chat window) is local. Sure, blizz could scan your addon folder for "suspicious" addons or whatever, but I really doubt that.

GMs can review what was said in chat to others, but they cannot review addon outputs in local, because that stuff never reached blizz servers.

As for the "can they detect if an addon uses protected lua functions" stuff - addons like Bartender also use protected lua, but they use the hooksecurefunc argument to do so - it's all client side protection (otherwise the lua unlock wouldn't work anyways) and thus the actual commands sent to the blizz servers are the same as if you'd press the button.

[Chifo]

Hi, Im geting an error:

The program cant start because MSVCP100.dll is missing from your computer.

Any one have the same issue???

tks

I fix the DLL Issue by reinstaling c++

but the unloker is not working... it close wow and send an error.... is this update?