[RELEASE] TargetLock - Automatically face your target.

[GordonGekko]

Really good work! Thx and +2Rep from me. I would like to use this for my multiboxing efforts and therefore I would love to have an option to link the aimbot to different WoW windows. I currently have four WoW windows running on one PC and it would be great to give all of the the aimbot feature So would it be complex to implement that?

Cheers
Gordon

[armen]

Seifer, I really can't wait to try your creation, but I am running into execution issues on my Win7 x64 Ultimate build. I start Wow, execute TargetLock.exe, and get the attached errors:

[Seifer]

Really good work! Thx and +2Rep from me. I would like to use this for my multiboxing efforts and therefore I would love to have an option to link the aimbot to different WoW windows. I currently have four WoW windows running on one PC and it would be great to give all of the the aimbot feature So would it be complex to implement that?

Cheers
Gordon

Can do that in multiple ways, I'll implement some suitable ones in the near future. (Next push )

Seifer, I really can't wait to try your creation, but I am running into execution issues on my Win7 x64 Ultimate build. I start Wow, execute TargetLock.exe, and get the attached errors:

First of all, make sure you are running the program as an Administrator. Second of all, the program _should_ be architecture neutral (x84 + x64), but I could build a x64 one for you tomorrow, care to try that one?

- Seifs

[armen]

Seifer, thanks for the quick reply. I am definitely running the executable as an Admin.

I will gladly try out the 64bit build whenever you compile it. Thanks!

P.S. I also tried Compatibility mode with various Windows versions, to no avail.

[Jadd]

My definition of out of process goes that anything which is not an injected DLL is out of process, by definition.

Your definition is absolutely correct. My definition of correct means "to be wrong"... after all, using your own definitions of things is a much smarter way to go, isn't it?

[PowerWoW]

Just for clickers :3

[MaiN]

Can do that in multiple ways, I'll implement some suitable ones in the near future. (Next push )



First of all, make sure you are running the program as an Administrator. Second of all, the program _should_ be architecture neutral (x84 + x64), but I could build a x64 one for you tomorrow, care to try that one?

- Seifs

fasm_managed requires x86. If you compile with "Any CPU" it will attempt to load it as a 64 bit assembly, while it isn't. You need to compile your project as x86 for this to work on both x86 and x64.

[l3luesummers]

Second of all, the program _should_ be architecture neutral (x84 + x64), but I could build a x64 one for you tomorrow, care to try that one?

- Seifs

Waiting to try this out as well.

[Cypher]

My definition of out of process goes that anything which is not an injected DLL is out of process, by definition.

Not by definition. At least, not by any definition that is technically relevant.
http://www.mmowned.com/forums/wow-me...cess-bots.html

People use 'out-of-process' to imply they're safer from Warden. This is not necessarily the case when you use retarded definitions like "I'm not injecting a DLL so I'm out of process". You're injecting other stuff, so what's the difference?

[Seifer]

Not by definition. At least, not by any definition that is technically relevant.
http://www.mmowned.com/forums/wow-me...cess-bots.html

People use 'out-of-process' to imply they're safer from Warden. This is not necessarily the case when you use retarded definitions like "I'm not injecting a DLL so I'm out of process". You're injecting other stuff, so what's the difference?

Thanks for clearing it up.

fasm_managed requires x86. If you compile with "Any CPU" it will attempt to load it as a 64 bit assembly, while it isn't. You need to compile your project as x86 for this to work on both x86 and x64.

Cheers, I was going to go there, and you confirmed it.

[Cypher]

Thanks for clearing it up.



Cheers, I was going to go there, and you confirmed it.

Not quite.

Remove the "stays out of process" retardation from the original post. Then it will be cleared up.

[Seifer]

Not quite.

Remove the "stays out of process" retardation from the original post. Then it will be cleared up.

Fixed, kind sir.

[armen]

Siefer, any updates on the 64bit architecture?

[Seifer]

Siefer, any updates on the 64bit architecture?

Dispatched you a PM.

[armen]

Thanks Seifs!